cybrsage Lifer Nov 17, 2011 13,021 0 0 May 11, 2012 #101 Jhhnn said: Well, yeh, and the OP thinks that a 20 point spread is "barely winning", too. Click to expand... For an incumbant, it is a very small spread. It would be akin to Saddam having won an election in Iraq with only a 20 point spread.
Jhhnn said: Well, yeh, and the OP thinks that a 20 point spread is "barely winning", too. Click to expand... For an incumbant, it is a very small spread. It would be akin to Saddam having won an election in Iraq with only a 20 point spread.
J Jhhnn IN MEMORIAM Nov 11, 1999 62,365 14,681 136 May 11, 2012 #102 cybrsage said: For an incumbant, it is a very small spread. It would be akin to Saddam having won an election in Iraq with only a 20 point spread. Click to expand... Utterly dishonest.
cybrsage said: For an incumbant, it is a very small spread. It would be akin to Saddam having won an election in Iraq with only a 20 point spread. Click to expand... Utterly dishonest.
cybrsage Lifer Nov 17, 2011 13,021 0 0 May 11, 2012 #103 Jhhnn said: Utterly dishonest. Click to expand... Nope. Here is an example, President Bush in 2004. The LOWEST amount he recieved was 79.55% of the vote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Republican_Party_presidential_nomination,_2004 Last edited: May 11, 2012
Jhhnn said: Utterly dishonest. Click to expand... Nope. Here is an example, President Bush in 2004. The LOWEST amount he recieved was 79.55% of the vote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/U.S._Republican_Party_presidential_nomination,_2004