- Aug 13, 2001
- 8,975
- 11
- 81
ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE
Chris Cooper
Ed Harris
Paul Newman
John C. Reilly
Christopher Walken
C'mon, even if Serkis SHOULD have been nominated, did you REALLY think he WOULD have been nominated? The academy has no consideration for FX-laden films in the top categories. I doubt Return of the King will win anything next year -- it's a "sequel".Originally posted by: Czar
"#%"#$&#$&#$:|:|:|
no gollum![]()
Originally posted by: DanTMWTMP
the site's being bogged down!! AT effect is in the works...
Originally posted by: LH
LoTR:TTT should have had the nomination About A Boy got for Best Adapted Screenplay.
Not that this is the sole criterion for nomination
Chicago or Gangs will probably win Best Pic. I'll put money on that too
Oh, and you're not biased, right?Originally posted by: kami
WHat a joke...
Peter Jackson doesn't even get NOMINATED for best director? Jesus...
I can't name any films off the top of my head that were nominated for best pic yet the director didn't get a best director nod (I know there are some...). Academy is all screwy now....it's all politics.Oh, and you're not biased, right?
Originally posted by: kami
I can't name any films off the top of my head that were nominated for best pic yet the director didn't get a best director nod (I know there are some...). Academy is all screwy now....it's all politics.Oh, and you're not biased, right?
Of course I'm biased...but look at the damn film. Even if you look at it on a technical basis, PJ should win. Holy sh!t!
Oh...and why did Minority Report get screwed? It should take place of Spider-man in that list for best visual effects.
where the hell is Road to Perdition???
Originally posted by: achiral
Originally posted by: kami
I can't name any films off the top of my head that were nominated for best pic yet the director didn't get a best director nod (I know there are some...). Academy is all screwy now....it's all politics.Oh, and you're not biased, right?
Of course I'm biased...but look at the damn film. Even if you look at it on a technical basis, PJ should win. Holy sh!t!
Oh...and why did Minority Report get screwed? It should take place of Spider-man in that list for best visual effects.
this just shows that the academy is a bunch of brainless sellouts that pander to the elite
Yeah right..and Dave Mathews is the Jimi Hendrix of Rythm GuitarOriginally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: achiral
Originally posted by: kami
I can't name any films off the top of my head that were nominated for best pic yet the director didn't get a best director nod (I know there are some...). Academy is all screwy now....it's all politics.Oh, and you're not biased, right?
Of course I'm biased...but look at the damn film. Even if you look at it on a technical basis, PJ should win. Holy sh!t!
Oh...and why did Minority Report get screwed? It should take place of Spider-man in that list for best visual effects.
this just shows that the academy is a bunch of brainless sellouts that pander to the elite
Actually, what it shows is the kind of bias fanboys really have.A film should NOT win best picture based on a technical basis. The film, otherwise, isn't one that is a crowning achievement in filmmaking. It's an epic film. They always get nominated just because of the size of the film, but it doesn't mean it was a good movie.
I've seen the LOTR movies now and I can say that I got the impression that in trying to keep with the original story, they compromised their skills as filmmakers.
Originally posted by: FeathersMcGraw
Originally posted by: LH
LoTR:TTT should have had the nomination About A Boy got for Best Adapted Screenplay.
About a Boy is a more faithful adaptation of the source material than The Two Towers is. Not that this is the sole criterion for nomination (and I suspect there may be a "no repeat" bias working against Jackson), but I firmly believe About a Boy belongs on that list. If I had my druthers (pretty rare for the Academy), it'd win.
Originally posted by: kami
WHat a joke...
Peter Jackson doesn't even get NOMINATED for best director? Jesus...
I'll put money on this fact: Scorcese will win it just because the academy feels sorry for him. Gangs is far from his best![]()
Chicago or Gangs will probably win Best Pic. I'll put money on that too![]()
Not even worth watching this year...
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Yeah right..and Dave Mathews is the Jimi Hendrix of Rythm GuitarOriginally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: achiral
Originally posted by: kami
I can't name any films off the top of my head that were nominated for best pic yet the director didn't get a best director nod (I know there are some...). Academy is all screwy now....it's all politics.Oh, and you're not biased, right?
Of course I'm biased...but look at the damn film. Even if you look at it on a technical basis, PJ should win. Holy sh!t!
Oh...and why did Minority Report get screwed? It should take place of Spider-man in that list for best visual effects.
this just shows that the academy is a bunch of brainless sellouts that pander to the elite
Actually, what it shows is the kind of bias fanboys really have.A film should NOT win best picture based on a technical basis. The film, otherwise, isn't one that is a crowning achievement in filmmaking. It's an epic film. They always get nominated just because of the size of the film, but it doesn't mean it was a good movie.
I've seen the LOTR movies now and I can say that I got the impression that in trying to keep with the original story, they compromised their skills as filmmakers.![]()
