I just got into the office.
Suddenly, I'm not surprised that this has devolved into partisan hate.
Even Rush was congratulating Obama this morning.
At least the left has come around to lauding late-night raids, executions, and information obtained from Gitmo through "alternate" means, instead of believing that the military does nothing but murder women and children in cold blood and bomb the shit out of civilians.
After so many years of this attitude, it is nice to see that some people can change their minds overnight.
Because I'm surprised that there was that much time. I was under the impression that he was still moving from place to place frequently and so with that in mind you would hit him as soon as you got the chance. Looks like that's not the case, so we had more time to prepare.
When was the left against raids at night, and who was against them specifically? Who is now supporting obtaining info from Gitmo through 'alternate means' (even though the means by which this info was gotten through are unknown)? Even if it were, who is lauding that? What people believe the military does nothing but murder women and children in cold blood?
Please be specific.
I just got into the office.
Suddenly, I'm not surprised that this has devolved into partisan hate.
Even Rush was congratulating Obama this morning.
When was the left against raids at night, and who was against them specifically?
It is a striking symptom of the moral depravity of the US war in Afghanistan ... Is that supposed to be an argument? Petraeus is saying: if you stop the night raids, you stop the war. If that is true, then that is all the more reason to oppose the night raids. ...
Maybe there has been no debate because deep down in our hearts we know that the best way to terrorize a people is to attack them in the dead of night after they have gone to sleep. Nobody can terrorize people as well as we do, nobody.
Who is now supporting obtaining info from Gitmo through 'alternate means' (even though the means by which this info was gotten through are unknown)? Even if it were, who is lauding that?
What people believe the military does nothing but murder women and children in cold blood?
Please be specific.
What 'tougher stance' would you have advocated? How would this have led to him being 'gotten earlier'? Be specific.
At least the left has come around to lauding late-night raids, executions, and information obtained from Gitmo through "alternate" means, instead of believing that the military does nothing but murder women and children in cold blood and bomb the shit out of civilians.
After so many years of this attitude, it is nice to see that some people can change their minds overnight.
He was shot twice in the head. Even if they did show the body it probably wouldnt be easily identifiable.
NSFW Photo at the top. Supposedly Osama after the fire fighter, the photo that was confirmed to be him by CIA and others
http://www.indiablooms.com/NewsDetailsPage/newsDetails020511a1.php
edit: NSFL http://web.naharnet.com/data/tempimages/big-EFAC99473CD4CC0FC2257884001D94F7.jpg
the photo, enlarged.
NSFW Photo at the top. Supposedly Osama after the fire fighter, the photo that was confirmed to be him by CIA and others
http://www.indiablooms.com/NewsDetailsPage/newsDetails020511a1.php
edit: NSFL http://web.naharnet.com/data/tempimages/big-EFAC99473CD4CC0FC2257884001D94F7.jpg
the photo, enlarged.
You're really joking, I'm sure. It was a cornerstone of the anti-war argument for the last couple years, at least.
Recent:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert-naiman/could-nonviolent-resistan_b_784827.html
The news stories state that information from Gitmo led to information which allowed this raid to take place. The left's stance has been that Gitmo in and of itself is a war crime, and nothing good can come from it. Now that Obama chose not to close it, it's suddenly not an issue. Now that info has been used to lead to a successful raid on OBL, suddenly Obama is a wartime hero. Keep lying to yourself though.
Specific? Murtha. Most reporters for the well-known leftist news outlets... HuffPo, Rolling Stone, etc. The only stories they are more than willing to report on are stories, whether substantiated or not, of US soldiers murdering women, children, and other innocents in the middle of the night.
You can lie to yourself all you want, but facts are facts.
Uh stop funding their backwards asses and if they did intact harbor the piece of shit we should treat them like the pieces of shit they would then be.
What funding do you think we give them, and how is it spent?
Your post is incoherent. For example, you refer to "Bin Laden DNA." Does that mean Osama's DNA or family's DNA? (I don't really care I'm just pointing out that you're incoherent.)
I'm "prattling on" because idiots like you keep responding to my posts out of context and trying to put words in my mouth. I SPECIFICALLY ACKNOWLEDGED THAT FAMILY DNA AND THE CORPSE IS ONE OF MANY PIECES OF EVIDENCE USED TO CONFIRM THE IDENTITY. I am not trying to deny that it is Osama. If you're going to respond I'd ask that you have the decency to read my other posts on the subject, asshat.
Somewhere in the area of $0, and I don't care how they choose to spend it.
Really. You thought liberals were against fighting at night. Listen to how dumb you sound.