You've argued that pretty strenuously for North Korea and Pakistan on these boards.Do you actually believe that I think other nations are entitled to money from America?
You've argued that pretty strenuously for North Korea and Pakistan on these boards.
And yet they have such great correlation . . .No I haven't. What is good US policy and what other nations are entitled to are two completely different things.
You've proven that quite aptly in your complete denial of 10 years of sentiment.
If you are going to say with a straight face, that the unilateral action of invading a foreign country, and assassinating a man without trial or arrest, based on information that wouldn't have been obtained but for the existence of Guantanamo, doesn't fly in the face of every principal put forth by the left over the last 10 years, then you're a clueless dupe.
Good for you though, again, I'm glad you can so quickly change your mind about the ends justifying the means.
He's completely accurate about the left in general, including Senator Obama and candidate Obama. Thank G-d President Obama is a more pragmatic creature. Either Obama never believed all that crap and regurgitated it only for political benefit, or he does believe it but was able to swallow his own druthers and do what had to be done. Either way, we win and Usama loses.It really is all about preserving your bumper sticker view of the world no matter what, isn't it?
He's completely accurate about the left in general, including Senator Obama and candidate Obama. Thank G-d President Obama is a more pragmatic creature. Either Obama never believed all that crap and regurgitated it only for political benefit, or he does believe it but was able to swallow his own druthers and do what had to be done. Either way, we win and Usama loses.
He's completely accurate about the left in general, including Senator Obama and candidate Obama. Thank G-d President Obama is a more pragmatic creature. Either Obama never believed all that crap and regurgitated it only for political benefit, or he does believe it but was able to swallow his own druthers and do what had to be done. Either way, we win and Usama loses.
explain this? I thought it was a pretty clean grab and go type deal, no losses on our side at all? does osama have military helicopterS?
![]()
A helicopter crashed with no American losses, then was blown up by special forces on the way out.
Hindsight being 20/20 and all, it makes a lot of sense now that he did an immediate about face on GITMO, and "made "catching" Osama a priority".
ahh ok, that doesn't look like a chinook wreck though...
I'm just repeating what I've heard in the news. I suspect a lot of details will remain under wraps for some time though![]()
can't be a chinnook, the make a Hell of noise, is a Black Hawk horse....I'm just repeating what I've heard in the news. I suspect a lot of details will remain under wraps for some time though![]()
can't be a chinnook, the make a Hell of noise, is a Black Hawk horse....
One official said that the stricken helicopter was a CH-47 Chinook and there was an unconfirmed report that the other was a modified MH-60.
my wife works for Sikorsky and I see them all the time in the open house, I m living just 10m from the Sikorsky, Sea Hawks are heavy and they carry a lot of fuel ( two tanks) the Black Hawks are the CH60 they are the one for the job in this case. Chinooks are heavy for this operation... let me ask the wife ...
[ ... ]
In a secret CIA prison in Eastern Europe years ago, al-Qaida's No. 3 leader, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, gave authorities the nicknames of several of bin Laden's couriers, four former U.S. intelligence officials said. Those names were among thousands of leads the CIA was pursuing.
[ ... ]
Mohammed did not reveal the names while being subjected to the simulated drowning technique known as waterboarding, former officials said. He identified them many months later under standard interrogation, they said, leaving it once again up for debate as to whether the harsh technique was a valuable tool or an unnecessarily violent tactic. ...
