Originally posted by: notfred
think we'll have cloaking devices (visual at least, if not radar, etc) by 2050?
Originally posted by: ndee
if this guys holds this ball. Why isn't HE shown if the ball is "semi-invisible"?
Originally posted by: johneetrash
Originally posted by: ndee
if this guys holds this ball. Why isn't HE shown if the ball is "semi-invisible"?
saw this yesterday. my guess is the ball/clothing/block is made up wutever it is to make the 'camouflage'... it wouldnt make sense if someone was wearing clothing that you could see through that but also see his skin...
Originally posted by: ndee
Originally posted by: johneetrash
Originally posted by: ndee
if this guys holds this ball. Why isn't HE shown if the ball is "semi-invisible"?
saw this yesterday. my guess is the ball/clothing/block is made up wutever it is to make the 'camouflage'... it wouldnt make sense if someone was wearing clothing that you could see through that but also see his skin...
but how can it display the cupboard behind the person? Why doesn't it show the wall?
Originally posted by: ndee
Originally posted by: johneetrash
Originally posted by: ndee
if this guys holds this ball. Why isn't HE shown if the ball is "semi-invisible"?
saw this yesterday. my guess is the ball/clothing/block is made up wutever it is to make the 'camouflage'... it wouldnt make sense if someone was wearing clothing that you could see through that but also see his skin...
but how can it display the cupboard behind the person? Why doesn't it show the wall?
Originally posted by: Jgtdragon
My cousin is not impressed. He said, "it looks someone with a film projector is shining on him thats all."
Looking at it again. He got a point.
Originally posted by: CaesarX
Damn, that's some impressive tech. Check out the second video. Link. Damn Japs! 😀
Originally posted by: Jgtdragon
My cousin is not impressed. He said, "it looks someone with a film projector is shining on him thats all."
Looking at it again. He got a point.
It can be done, but active camo will still work just fine, even if it isn't perfect. It is still worlds apart from the standard army issue camo the troops use nowdays.Originally posted by: Jellomancer
True active camouflage won't work. Each pixel would have to be 3d, with a different image shown to every angle that looks at it.
That's what i thought, but then i noticed that his glasses don't reflect it. Not to mention the rest of his body.My cousin is not impressed. He said, "it looks someone with a film projector is shining on him thats all."
Looking at it again. He got a point.
Originally posted by: Placer14
I saw this a long time ago. US military is experimenting with this sort of thing. They have entire suits, armored tanks wrapped in Optical Fibers. With small cameras around the object in the suit/armor that's actively taking pictures and project the image through the optical fiber. Final product makes the camoflaged object look like a heatwave. How they got opticle fiber to be that flexible or how they actually dispatched the fiber to show continuous image, i'm not certain. But i remember a support pack was needed if it was on the suit version. The pack processed the image and provided power and was about 10" by 15" by 8". Pretty good. It was a special on Non Leathal Weapons and Technology.
One of the more amusing jokes on the subject 😀Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
Considering you have a "hit" out on your life you may want to invest in this 😛
Originally posted by: zsouthboy
wow.