OpenGL Fur Benchmark

[MichiganMan]

Originally posted by: JimiP

-Edit: What is the "Stability Mode" for? I left it going for about 2400 seconds and then just stopped it. lol

Haven't seen anyone answer your question. Stability mode would be for when you want to purposefully stress the card, perhaps to check your cooling scheme, or do a burn-in after a new build. Its effective, 30 minutes of stability mode got my BFG 8800 GT up to 92c. Normal idle is 57c, and Quake4 never got it much over 77c.

BTW, if anyone was wondering, this runs like a champ on Linux under Wine. I tried it on a lark, and it fired right up and flew straight on the first try.

In any case, my numbers are:

Default res: 2423 oMarks
1680x1050: 2307 oMarks

I think these are the first Linux numbers in this thread.

 

[roblob]

3238 on my e4400 at 3.0ghz, hd 2900xt, 2gb ram, and vista 64bit

 

[Somniferum]

2413 o3Marks

 

[bryanW1995]

well, it was more than a minute, but with clocks at 860/2662 I got 3294 at default 1280x1024 0AA. at native res of 14x9 I got 4150

 

[Realguns]

[ Score: 3290 o3Marks ] - Time=60 sec
Window Params: 1280x1024 - MSAA: 0X
FPS Min:46 FPS Max:71 FPS Avg:55
ATI Radeon HD 3870
8.432.0.0 - Catalyst 07.11

Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E4500 @ 2.20GHz
3355 MHz
2046 Mb
Windows XP build 2600 [Service Pack 2]

Sapphire Radeon 3870@ 860/2601 stable as heck.
Fan @60% Highest temp was 63C

Fan runs 30% stock and any real overclocking results in 90C.

 

[bryanW1995]

huh. looks like cpu speed has no bearing at all on score, and memory speed appears to have minimal if any impact, too.

 

[zorrt]

2328 @ 1280 x 1024 (default)
2226 @ 1650 x 1050
884 @ 1650x1050 8XAA

Whats with me getting higher than some of the people with higher PC specs (higher CPU and faster GPU) with default settings? Buggy benchmark?

 

[JimiP]

Originally posted by: JimiP
First off, I just want to say... that's a very cool benchmark. I ran the benchmark on the system specified in my signature.

Link: http://img99.imageshack.us/my.php?image=furbenchrc1.jpg

1796 o3Marks
Window Params: 1280x1024 - MSAA: 8X
FPS Min:24 FPS Max:40 FPS Avg:30

-----

Link: http://img248.imageshack.us/my...?image=furtest2zh3.jpg

2884 o3Marks
Window Params: 1280x1024 - MSAA: 0X
FPS Min:40 FPS Max:61 FPS Avg:48

-Edit: What is the "Stability Mode" for? I left it going for about 2400 seconds and then just stopped it. lol

I overclocked my HD2900XT from 743/1000 to 875/1250 and this is what I got.

Score: 2076 o3Marks
Window Params: 1280x1024 - MSAA: 8X
FPS Min:28 FPS Max:46 FPS Avg:35

Score: 3375 o3Marks
Window Params: 1280x1024 - MSAA: 0X
FPS Min:47 FPS Max:71 FPS Avg:56

Oh yeahhhh... lol

 

[Seraphiel]

Again, there is no hope for GeForce in this benchmark, if AMD get Crossfire to work anywhere near SLI's efficiency. Until then SLI makes Nvidia a winner ... but an empty win that is. I especially like this is an OpenGL benchmark, where Nvidia usually dominates.

 

[Aeros]

Default settings

Score: 708
Min/Max/Avg 10/21/12

Rig in sig.

 

[Finalnight]

2398

 

[xSkyDrAx]

1455 @ 1680x1050 no AA

 

[sgrinavi]

I just re-ran the test on my systems; with the default setting in the FUR rendering bench

9800gx2 scored a 3093 - FPS min 41/max 67 Avg 52
4850 crossfire scored 5328- FPS min 64/max 119 Avg 92

What I find interesting is that in OpenGL only a single 4850 is working at 99%, the other is 2 or 3.%...

 

[hclarkjr]

just ran it on my system and got this Score: 3068 o3Marks

 

[Kharohz]

Default

Score: 6011 o3Marks

1680x1050, 4xAA

Score: 5500 o3Marks

4870, Q9450

 

[dadach]

SCORE:
6767 DEFAULT
6513 4x



CPU 8500@4.0
ati 4870 850/1150

update...some screenshots with even higher clocks/better scores

http://img233.imageshack.us/my.php?image=0xcq9.jpg

http://img53.imageshack.us/my.php?image=4xaa2.jpg

http://img53.imageshack.us/my.php?image=8xqv1.jpg

 

[SSChevy2001]

Default
Score: 3404 o3Marks

min / max / avg
47 / 73 / 57

 

[firewolfsm]

5302

4850 @ 690/1140
Q6600 @ 2.9
4GB @ 820 (4-4-4-12)

 

[nevbie]

Default but windowed
Score: 4536
FPS: 59/104/76

Celeron 420 (1.6GHz) @ 2.68GHz + Radeon 4850

 

[MichaelD]

This thread had such good intentions. But I see lots of BS scores here. Screen shots mandatory!

 

[JAG87]

Default: 7915
2560x1600 w/ 4xAA: 3519

specs in sig, vanilla cards, AFR rendering

pfft ati...

 

[Marty502]

Heh, I must have an all time low record (currently with backup video card)

138 Marks!

That's at 1280x1024, 0xAA.

Yeah, this card is terrible!

 

[sgrinavi]

I swapped processors on my two systems and re-ran the test with the default setting in the FUR rendering bench

9800gx2 scored a 3127 - FPS min 43/max 67 Avg 52 (e8400)
4850 crossfire scored 5274- FPS min 71/max 120 Avg 88 (q6600)

compared to

Originally posted by: sgrinavi

9800gx2 scored a 3093 - FPS min 41/max 67 Avg 52 (q6600)
4850 crossfire scored 5328- FPS min 64/max 119 Avg 92 (e8400)

 

[Bill Kunert]

2440 @ 10 X 12 0 MSAA
8800GS, 3800 X2 @ 2750

 

[Jesusthewererabbit]

2506 at default

3850, X2 6000