• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

OpenGL Fur Benchmark

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
mmmm . . . furry doughnuts . . . . . (drools)

Score: 1112 o3Marks - Time=60 sec
GeForce 7900 GS
Opteron 270 @ 2009 MHz

I've got a FireGL z-128 I'll try it on later . . . .

Edit:

Score: 74 o3Marks - Time=60 sec
FireGL z1-128mb
slot1 P!!! 996mhz

woohoo!
 
:roll: I think I need a new video card...

Score: 250 o3Marks - Time=60 sec

Window Params: 1280x1024 - MSAA: 0X
FPS Min:4 FPS Max:8 FPS Avg:4
RADEON X700 Series x86/MMX/3DNow!/SSE2* OCed to 500/500
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 3800+
2500 MHz
2046 Mb
Windows XP build 2600 Service Pack 2
 
* Does not run unless OpenGL 2.0 hardware is present.
* Crashes after complaining about that.
* Uninstaller has wrong program name ("GLCapsViewer" or somesuch).
 
FUR Rendering Benchmark v1.0.0
[ Score: 3066 o3Marks ] - Time=60 sec
Window Params: 1280x1024 - MSAA: 0X
FPS Min:42 FPS Max:65 FPS Avg:51
ATI Radeon HD 2900 XT
8.401.0.0 - Catalyst 07.8
Dual Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 170 2599 MHz
2045 Mb
Windows Vista ver.6.0 build 6000 [No Service Pack]

EDIT: 2nd Run without WMP10 playing in background 😀
 
767 points:

[ Score: 767 o3Marks ] - Time=60 sec
Window Params: 1280x1024 - MSAA: 0X
FPS Min:11 FPS Max:18 FPS Avg:13
 
[ Score: 278 o3Marks ] - Time=60 sec
Window Params: 1280x1024 - MSAA: 0X
FPS Min:4 FPS Max:7 FPS Avg:5
GeForce 6600 GT (128mb)
Forceware 6.14.11.6218
Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.53GHz (533fsb)
2755 MHz
1023 Mb (PC2700 on a non-dual channel mobo)
Windows XP build 2600 [Service Pack 2]
 
Originally posted by: bryanW1995
Originally posted by: JAG87
Is it just me, or is this benchmark ATI biased?

Originally posted by: Rottie
score 4012 o3marks
Click to expand...

I bet you have HD 2900s in crossfire...
Click to expand...
I wish. I got 1327 🙁
Click to expand...

Something is wrong there, I see that most people with the X1950XT scores between 1700 and 1900, your score is too low, Did the CCC settings were on default? Like FSAA and AF? Update drivers if necessary.
 
1676 at default settings
1214 at 1920x1200, 4xAA
Radeon 1900xt 512mb @641/800, XP pro

Anyone think this app has lower performance in Vista?
 
For SLI users, create a custom profile for Benchmark.exe and set the SLI rendering mode to Alternate Frame Rendering 2.

With system in sig, SLI enabled, I got:
1024x768 0AA: 8093 o3marks
1280x1024 0AA: 4891 o3marks
1920x1200 4AA: 3533 o3marks
2560x1600 0AA: 2131 o3marks
2560x1600 4AA: 2060 o3marks

Same tests, SLI disabled:
1024x768 0AA: 4225 o3marks
1280x1024 0AA: 2517 o3marks
1920x1200 4AA: 1030 o3marks (tested 3 times, same result +/-3 o3marks)
2560x1600 0AA: 1087 o3marks
2560x1600 4AA: 471 o3marks

Tested with Forceware 169.09 beta.
 
guess I figured it out. 3290, still at 1280x1024 defaults, 3870 at 860/2602, cpu is down to 2.66 (stock) pending system stability error discovery. fur is still the only thing besides boinc, ie7, and CCC that I can get to work properly it seems...can't wait to try out crysis/3dmark06/etc with system back up to speed 🙂
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top