OpenGL Fur Benchmark

[winnar111]

This furmark thing really beats the crap out of my card. I get maybe 65 C in most games, but Furmark pushes 90 C.

 

[Cogman]

1556 9600GT, Q6600 oc to 3.0 GHZ, and of course. Linux . I would say the linux drivers and wine are the biggest slowdowns

 

[tno]

Hey this test kind of likes my rig. Not common sadly.

Default 2693

E4500 @ 2.93
8800GTS (G92) stock

 

[bryanW1995]

I get better numbers at my native res, 14x9. Here they are:

x3350@3.6
4850 @ 690/1075
14x9

0xAA total score 5855, min 82, max 143, avg 98
2xAA total score 3542, min 51, max 83, avg 59
4xAA total score 2170, min 31, max 52, avg 36

for comparison, at default 1280x1024 no AA, I got 4850.

 

[octopus41092]

1280x1024
0x AA
Score: 4982
FPS Min: 66
FPS Max: 115
FPS Avg: 83

http://img144.imageshack.us/my...ge=furbenchmarkov2.jpg


1680x1050
8x AA
Score: 3372
FPS Min: 46
FPS Max: 75
FPS Avg: 56

http://img390.imageshack.us/my...urbenchmark1680rg8.jpg

System in Sig

It seems like the HD4850 does really well in this.

 

[sliderule]

3091 o3marks default settings

intel e4500@2750/ hd3870 cat 8.7/ 2x2 gigs ddr2/vista 32bit

 

[SolMiester]

1599 @ default

 

[dadach]

Originally posted by: JAG87

pfft ati...

cool then...on default benchmark SINGLE 4870 is only 14% slower than DUAL GTX280

 

[Krynj]

1680x1050 - 0x - 5501
1680x1050 - 8x - 1525

FurMark 1.4.0

 

[DrMrLordX]

Originally posted by: Marty502
Heh, I must have an all time low record (currently with backup video card)

138 Marks!

That's at 1280x1024, 0xAA.

Yeah, this card is terrible!

You wish you were the worst.

CPU: x2-3600+ @ 2.65 ghz
Vid card: GeForce 6150 (onboard), 256 mb allocated

result: 56 marks at 1280x1024, 0xAA

Maybe I'd get a better result if I put my CPU back up to 3.1 or so, but why bother?

 

[FalseChristian]

I get 2640 for 1 8800GT and 5145 in SLI mode (split-screen renderer). All at default.

 

[dug777]

Originally posted by: Marty502
Heh, I must have an all time low record (currently with backup video card)

138 Marks!

That's at 1280x1024, 0xAA.

Yeah, this card is terrible!

330 Marks

My 3450>your x1300

 

[sgrinavi]

Originally posted by: dadach




cool then...on default benchmark SINGLE 4870 is only 14% slower than DUAL GTX280

The ATIs do much better in OpenGL apps than their Nvida counterparts as is evident by my $560 gx2 getting the crap kicked out of it by a $150 4850....

 

[MichaelD]

Default 1280x1024/NO AA 2462
1920x1200/NO AA 1821

I wonder if it's a SMP-aware app like Cinebench? I've got the horsepower for that. It's probably the videocard holding me back. Where's my 4870X2?! I'm gonna kill this benchmark then...

 

[ajaidevsingh]

Scored 5022 in default...

2x4850's


EDIT My MB is a Palit P35a that means 16x - 4x CF slots

 

[Canai]

At my native res with all AA/AF forced maxed in CCC, including 24X CFAA.

[ Score: 2732 o3Marks ] - Time=60 sec
Window Params: 1360x768 - MSAA: 8X
FPS Min:33 FPS Max:65 FPS Avg:45

Native res without CFAA

[ Score: 7678 o3Marks ] - Time=60 sec
Window Params: 1360x768 - MSAA: 8X
FPS Min:80 FPS Max:163 FPS Avg:128

So the CFAA cuts my FPS in half :laugh:

 

[Nathelion]

Resolution 1920x1200
8x MSAA: 1230
No MSAA: 4284
I have an HD4870.

Edit: System has 2x Opteron 2350 @ 2.0 GHz and 16 GB of RAM.

 

[sgrinavi]

Default settings with my x48 system below

Score: 6415 o3Marks FPS Min:89 FPS Max:141 FPS Avg:107
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
the same system with a gx2

9800gx2 scored a 3093 - FPS min 41/max 67 Avg 52

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
My x38 system

4850 crossfire scored 5328- FPS min 64/max 119 Avg 92

 

[ChronoReverse]

4787 on my stock HD4850. (Q6600@3GHz, 8GB RAM, Vista64)

Isn't this supposed to a OGL test? lol

 

[Avalon]

4678 w/4xAA @ 1280x960 on an HD4850 and 4Ghz C2D.
4850 (lol) using stock settings.

 

[iambrian]

This may be a dumb question.. but I've forgotten.. is a higher mark better?and what's the difference between these? They seem to do the same thing. Also as an fyi, neither one shows proper ram amount.

http://img190.imageshack.us/img190/2996/furv.jpg


http://img44.imageshack.us/img44/4148/fluidmark.jpg

 

[FalseChristian]

At my LCD's native resolution of 1680x1050 and using the rig in my sig I get 5102.