Safeway
Lifer
- Jun 22, 2004
- 12,075
- 11
- 81
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Safeway
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Veramocor
I think his argument in summary is that the United States in particular values 9salary wise) professions that may be easier than engineering and don't really produce anything like Finance or business.
What an ignorant thing to say. It's entrepreneurs and financiers that allow ideas to go from paper/concept to shelf. They are the true talent and are very rare. You engineers are a dime a dozen.
Disagree. True talent in any field is very rare. You think that all finance or business majors become entrepreneurs and financiers? What about the "dime a dozen" auditors and accountants and middle-management?
Sure, investment is required for initial development in any field, but look at Intel. You have engineers driving the research and development. Financiers are not required when you have brilliant engineers taking "ideas ... from paper/concept to shelf."
What part of "entrepreneurs and financiers" don't you understand? But of course a leech lawyer like you who brings net negative value to society wouldn't understand.
Financiers are absolutely required to take ideas to market. I don't give a shit if it's your grandmother giving you a $50k loan or a VC buying preferred stock, no financier = no product.
Ah, leech lawyer mindset, I've met people like you -- they were all unsuccessful, ignorant, uneducated, uncouth, and probably mildly retarded. I cannot say that you are the same, though, as I have not met you.
