One APU to rule the video card market?

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Lonyo

Lifer
Aug 10, 2002
21,939
6
81
Well, I dought an APU will ever replace high end cards, but may well overwhelm low end cards manufactures, Still would be nice to see an IGPU run a game like GTA IV on full settings AND AA turned up to max... :D

5 years after release, on a very CPU limited game?
You need HD7770 performance to play 1080p without AA, good luck getting HD7770 plus the ability to use AA on IGP with limited memory bandwidth.
 

BenSkywalker

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
9,140
67
91
A 7750, the level of graphics power the top end Kaveri is reliably projected to possess

Laughable on multiple fronts. First, you won't have enough bandwidth for it. Second, that 7750 is not going to be anything besides decidedly low end in Q4 '13(with AMD's recent track record, that could be closer to Q2 '15). If the part were out *right now* it would be laughed at by the gaming community. It won't be out for about another year. It is a *BAD* product. If you people really want to help AMD, be honest with them about how badly they are destroying their company.

7950 performance for $300 ... that's for the APU + motherboard + AIB ... with an unlocked Kaveri rolling a Steamroller core.

I'm starting to think that you are a paid nVidia shill. AMD *always* fails, perhaps they have changed their approach instead of hyping their products, lie through their teeth about AMD's offerings and then when they aren't remotely in the league of what the forum posters stated, everyone will be throttling on them. See Bulldozer, wunder APU it was, we heard all the same lies about that architecture too. Abject failure.

Will it run Far Cry 3 at 1080p with Ultra settings + maxed anti-aliasing ... no.

If it would it would be *UNACCEPTABLE* still. Crysis 3 will be out for several quarters before this ships. You are setting your expectations far higher then what AMD can hope to deliver. There is this pesky thing called math. There is a *VERY* limited amount of bandwidth available to CPUs, not even close to what GPUs have. To then have them share that bandwidth with not only compute functions, but also the GPU? AMD is going to fail to come close to your dreams. Feel free to quote me.

The engineering of the Xi3 has absolutely maximized the cooling potential possible for that cu/in volume enclosure.

When using disgracefully poor parts, you better maximize your cooling potential. Given the huge heat signature for the atrocious performance levels they are using, cooling *HAD* to be a main priority.

Xi3, let's just see how pathetic that machine is-

$949-

i3 2120, GT640, 6GB DDR3, 256GB SSD, DVD-RW

NewEgg bargain shopping? No, that's from Alienware. Even going with absurdly overpriced prebuilts it is trivial to obliterate the Xi3's performance for less money. If you think the form factor is a big deal, well there may be twenty people who agree with you.
 

Pedroc1999

Senior member
Jan 8, 2013
305
0
0
I said that not to put people down, but once ddr4 and 5 come into place. All this may or may not be possible. Would you rather me have said - THIS IS IMPOSSIBLE... DONT GET UR HOPES UP. THIS WILL NEVER HAPPEN
 

psoomah

Senior member
May 13, 2010
416
0
0
http://www.ibuypower.com/Store/Revolt_R320

http://www.dell.com/us/p/alienware-x51/pd.aspx

Much better size for a compact gaming PC.
Similar sized to games consoles, but with actual hardware inside, and cheap enough to be reasonably priced.
Good luck getting something that powerful in something far far smaller without it costing a lot more.

http://arstechnica.com/apple/2012/1...imac-takes-two-steps-forward-one-step-back/4/
Because it fits the topic.

Replace "thinness" with "small size".

Ars Technica: "In a desktop computer, though, the pursuit of thinness at the cost of features makes less sense. The vast majority of the time, it's going to be sitting on your desk, and users will be interacting with a separate keyboard and mouse, pausing only occasionally to plug something in or adjust the screen's angle."

None of which applies to the coming Xi3 XA7, which solves or simply bypasses all the above issues.

A fully cooled ultra portable 4" cube with a full set of ports + on/off button + reset button all on one easily accessible side providing midrange computer and above average graphics performance and then the Kaveri chip becomes available will provide high performance computer power with serious gaming chops.

Why are you fighting this obvious triumph of engineering optimization?
 

Lonyo

Lifer
Aug 10, 2002
21,939
6
81
Why does it need to be portable????!!?!?!?!!?!??!!?!?!?!?????!!?!?!?!
Also, it's not a damned triumph of engineering to put mobile components in a small space.
People do it all the time. We call them laptops. Derp.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

BenSkywalker

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
9,140
67
91
Why are you fighting this obvious triumph of engineering optimization?

We laughed at the Mac Cube for being a stupid POS, it was better then this.

Why are you fighting this obvious triumph of engineering optimization?

We are looking at the octa core cell phones trying to figure out what is so impressive about four times the performance using thirty times the physical space.
 

Pedroc1999

Senior member
Jan 8, 2013
305
0
0
Sorry to correct you but the octa core is referring to Samungs S4 possible dual cpu? It is 2 seperate cpu's one low end with low clock rate and is just about enough for the phone to stay on, then u have a 4core monster with a huge clock of over 1.5 that is used when it is needed. They are never both on at a time. They are just used as they are needed. Think of it as a dual-cpu mobile phone
 

Lonyo

Lifer
Aug 10, 2002
21,939
6
81
They can actually be used at the same time.

154846412oiv2a05bpf5b7.jpg


See mode #3
 

psoomah

Senior member
May 13, 2010
416
0
0
this Ben guy is killing me. Stop it already...eeewww see what you did.
those 2 investors that were already cooked are running like hell now

@psoomah continue to ignore him, maybe they come back.

just shortly, how is 2014+(?) Kaveri going to stand against this?

http://www.anandtech.com/show/6600/...rformance-compared-to-nvidias-geforce-gt-650m

--

My reasoning on this is as follows:

1. AMD's CES slideshow identified gaming as "a massive market opportunity for AMD'. That backs up copious evidence AMD is putting massive resources into it's gaming related divisions to take full advantage of that massive market opportunity. There is certainly no other lucrative market segment AMD can leverage it's APU strategy to so thoroughly eliminate meaningful competition. It pretty much stands as a unique, relatively short term and highly lucrative plum just waiting to be plucked.

2. AMD's CES roadmap shows Kaveri retail availability towards the end of 2013. Thee consoles would certainly get first priority to the initial 28nm Kaveri runs, which per Charlie D's 2013 console release cutoff timeline means the initial console Kaveri/variants mass production is currently in progress. Hence the initial engineering samples would have been available coincident with the rumored timeline both Microsoft and Sony rethought and changed their next gen plans and decided to go with an all AMD solution. This strongly suggests a Kavei based next gen solution for both Microsoft and Sony. Likely a more extensively customized Kaveri for Microsoft and a somewhat less customized Kaveri, perhaps even a near stock Kavveri, for Sony based on their financial situation and Haz Kirai's recent statements in Japan indicating a somewhat less powerful console than expected and one optimized for almost immediate profit.

3. AMD's Kaveri Steamroller HSA based architecture with a unified address space, common memory pool and GCN 2.0 graphics is backed up by an already extensive and growing middleware and development toolkit for that particular architecture, a unique architectural configuration substantially different than what Intel or Nvidia has.That architecture in both next gen game consoles means AMD will be involved at multiple levels with next gen game engines and game developers in addition to their involvement with Microsoft and Sony. This gives AMD the inside track at every level of next gen game development. For game developers and publishers the better their games run on cheap computers, the more they sell. Including already coded Kaveri optimizations in their PC ports would be good for business.

4. AMD will be highly motivated to make sure the next gen PC ports will be highly optimized for the Kaveri architecture. As that optimization will already exist in the console versions of the games, it is logical to project extensive built in optimization for the Kaveri line of chips that will be coming out in the same time frame as the next gen consoles.

5. AMD already has far better drivers than the notoriously bad drivers Intel standardly provides. On next gen games with their continuing deep involvement it can be expected AMD's Kaveri drivers will be highly polished from day 1 including for games as they are released. AMD has made gaming a primary focus of their strategy and is allocating their resources accordingly. This focus is going to be felt across the gaming spectrum.

6. Game developers and publishers carefully prioritize their resources. Optimizing for console ports (read AMD's architecture) will be priority no. 1, optimizing for Intel or Nvidia architectures for their PC ports will be very far down the list, particularly with a brand new architecture like Haswell. It is unlikely to receive more than cursory attention unless Intel throws some substantial money at the developers. Same goes for Nvidia.

7. In the case of Haswell, it's raw performace might exceed Trinity by 20-30%, but Kaveri is reliably predicted to double Trinty's graphics performance and closing in on this in it's CPU performance. Kaveri's raw gaming performance will substantially exceed Haswell's. Kaveri with a standard AMD driver advantage will supercharge that graphics advantage. Kaveri with the coding and driver advantage resulting from it's console domination will nitrous inject that supercharger. Looking at a massive blowout advantage over Haswell here.

8. Not expecting Nvidia to fare well against this advantage either.

9. I expect AMD is going all in to lock up the Steam Box, which would give it a solid 800 lb gorilla status in the console and x86 gaming space. AMD certainly has the best immediate solution to a Steam Box console. The Xi3 Piston is a verified 'Steam' box to run current x86 Steam games, but it's unverified if it will also be configured to run 'Steam Box'. It's hard to pin down what G. Newell's long range strategy might be. He might be taking into account whether solidifying that AMD 800lb gorilla status is in Valve's long term interest and might go with an initially less immediately optimum Intel/Nvidia solution. Or he might be playing coy by oblique references to Nvidia relating to ongoing negotiations with AMD. Valve remains a wildcard. But with or without 'Steam Box' AMD has a massive advantage over Intel and Nvidia, perhaps sufficient advantage in the case of Nvidia to force it from the consumer graphics space over the coming years. If AMD also nails Steam Box, it would all but seal Nvidia's fate in consumer graphics.

So to answer your question - I would say Kaveri is going to stand up against that quite handsomely.
 
Last edited:

f1sherman

Platinum Member
Apr 5, 2011
2,243
1
0
wait a sec, all... this based on "AMD's CES slideshow"??

all this crazy "optimizations" already going on, yet the object of this optimizations (HSA) is nothing more than a writing on the wall and buzzword for investors.
Not to mention that no one ever gives a damn about PC optimizations.
You are taking as given that that coding for PS3=XBOX720=PC.
and that all optimizations done for PS3/Xbox will automatically be retained when porting to PC.

Kaveri is reliably predicted to double Trinty's graphics performance

I suppose this is as reliable as any of your assumptions, or is there something more reliable? Link?
And even so, the hell is 7750 going to do in PC gaming in 2014?
Same what Trinity has done in 2012. More of inventory write-off?

Or perhaps not because what was supposed to be $500 million in wafer, is now only $115M.
Does not sound like AMD is ramping anything if you ask me.

AMD 800lb gorilla

...
 
Last edited:

psoomah

Senior member
May 13, 2010
416
0
0
wait a sec, all... this based on "AMD's CES slideshow"??

The referenced statement in the slide show provides a rationale underpinning for subsequent expositions, but 'all this' is more based on the logic and rationalities contained in those subsequent expositions.

A stated potential shedding light on subsequent emerging information and activity leading to logical inferences and deductions as it were.
 
Last edited:

ShintaiDK

Lifer
Apr 22, 2012
20,378
145
106
nVidia GPUs will be those lasting the longest as it is today.

Its AMD canibalizing their own sales. Plus AMDs utter failure in the GPU division both marketshare and financial.

AMD is a company that might not even survive 2013.

2012-12-04_CLT1.jpg
 
Last edited:

psoomah

Senior member
May 13, 2010
416
0
0
nVidia GPUs will be those lasting the longest as it is today.

Its AMD canibalizing their own sales. Plus AMDs utter failure in the GPU division both marketshare and financial.

AMD is a company that might not even survive 2013.

'AMD's utter failure in the GPU division' = hyperbolic nonsense unrelated to factual reality.

AMD is taking the necessary steps to survive through 2013 and thrive thereafter. Whether that succeeds depends more on the teetering world economies and financial system, which, if another collapse occurs, will dwarf what happened in 2008 and will probably take AMD down, along with myriad other companies, tech and otherwise.

My posts address not who will be lasting 'as it is today', but who will be lasting 'as it will be tomorrow'.

It's a simple projection based on a set of solidly based assumptions - AMD supplying the CPU and GPU with advanced technologies for the next gen consoles and the middleware and developments tools for implementing those technologies while releasing a line of APU's containing those same technologies concurrent with the console releases give AMD substantial competitive advantages against Intel and Nvidia into the future. Assuming the validity of those assumptions, the conclusion is so manifestly logically true sincere denial of it verges on insanity.

While the same advantages that provided AMD inclusion in the Xbox 720 and PS4 would be in play in competing for the Steam Box console, who won that contract is unknown. It is however manifest that if AMD did secure that contract, they would achieve overwhelming advantage in the console and PC gaming spaces.
 
Last edited:

f1sherman

Platinum Member
Apr 5, 2011
2,243
1
0
'AMD's utter failure in the GPU division' = hyperbolic nonsense unrelated to factual reality.

Actually it's very factual.

Paying $5-6B for a company, and then loosing %80 of company value while trying to figure what to do with it, is a pretty much synonym for failure.

If they took those $5B in $100 notes and made a big unicorn in the sky, and then divided the rest to it's workers and shareholders, it would have been money well spent.
 
Aug 11, 2008
10,451
642
126
My reasoning on this is as follows:



7. In the case of Haswell, it's raw performace might exceed Trinity by 20-30%, but Kaveri is reliably predicted to double Trinty's graphics performance and closing in on this in it's CPU performance. Kaveri's raw gaming performance will substantially exceed Haswell's. Kaveri with a standard AMD driver advantage will supercharge that graphics advantage. Kaveri with the coding and driver advantage resulting from it's console domination will nitrous inject that supercharger. Looking at a massive blowout advantage over Haswell here.

Would you care to cite this "reliable prediction"? I dont even recall this outlandish prediction in even AMDs most optimistic PR slides.