"Only about 10 percent know what radiation is."
Probably why people who hear that food is being irradiated freak out.
"OMG, now my food will glow and make me grow into a huge mutant!!!! Nooooo!!!!"
Oh wait, that's right, your TV puts out quite a few different kinds of radiation.
Originally posted by: Martin
Originally posted by: TallBill
Who cares, science isn't extremely relevant to most Adults. I do know about the stuff they are talking about, but it hasn't really helped me out any during my life.
And what happens when these illiterate people start to have an opinion on scientific matters?
Or get into political office and start writing policy for scientific matters.
"Psh, who needs a particle accelerator. We already know everything about physics. Einstein discovered the last of it."
Let's see, other great myths I hear
- All nuclear reactors either will undergo catastrophic failure Chernobyl-style, OR else when (not "if," "when" they say) they meltdown, they will blow up, nuclear bomb-style.
- Global warming means that if it's not 100F in Antarctica, it's all a hoax.
- Irradiating food makes it radioactive.
Other knowledge is lacking too, economics for instance. One guy at work was complaining about gas prices, and said, "The government should fix the price of gas."
My thoughts on the matter: "They tried a system like that where the government controls the price of things. It was in the Soviet Union, called communism. It didn't work. Second, the US doesn't have jurisdiction over OPEC."
This is what I hear at the warehouse. The workers there are generally uneducated, some without even a high school diploma. I didn't comment on the gas price fixing thing though; debating anything like that, or anything scientific, with this particular bunch of people might be like bringing a lightsaber to a knife fight.
No, I don't think that works. Maybe like bringing a vibrator to a knife fight. It'd just wind up confusing the hell out of everyone involved, and nothing good would come of it.
Originally posted by: KeithP
How does it compare to similar studies in other countries?
The purpose of studies like this is to try to drum up public support for increased spending on education. It is the academic equivalent of a guy standing by a freeway on/off ramp begging for money. They don't really care how we compare to other countries unless they can bend the data in such a way as to make our education system seem under funded.
-KeithP
And you need to find a nice way of telling the public, "Most of you are really quite ignorant."