John Connor
Lifer
- Nov 30, 2012
- 22,757
- 619
- 121
It looks like the OP has been changing the post. Still, the only way to win is not to play. :whiste:
It was smart not to play from the begin with LOL that's why I didn't vote!
It looks like the OP has been changing the post. Still, the only way to win is not to play. :whiste:
Intelligence isn't a function of mouth width. If anything, they're negatively correlated.
My IQ test came back negative!![]()
congratulations on your lack of intelligence. Enjoy the bliss. :awe:
rather than the extremes, we need to base it off the average. Would the average be 5 or a bit lower 3 or 4?
How is this scale setup? what is the formula for the scale? are we looking at a simple linear scale? What are the values for each? Did you instead mean to do a logarithmic scale?
This appears to be a childish "trick question" and nothing more that even an average 6 year old would figure out.
EDIT
I am quite intelligent and even more-so arrogant. I do tend to argue, but I get along best with people who are hyper-intelligent and extremely arrogant.
You guys do realize that 1 is highest and 10 is lowest. An average 6 year old could figure that out. :whiste:
10/10 = more 1/10 = less So reword your dumbshit poll to 'how stupid are you on a scale of 1-10.' And then rate yourself a ten.
You guys do realize that 1 is highest and 10 is lowest. An average 6 year old could figure that out. :whiste:
Here's an idea- if you claim you have above average intelligence, ... It's called illusory superiority. Without some external validation, one's opinion of one's talents is meaningless.
So, put up or shut up.
