Originally posted by: VirtualLarry
Originally posted by: n0cmonkey
Performance that isn't used is like something that no one knows about, it isn't really there until you find it.
I noticed something recently with my machine. It's a middle-of-the-road Althon XP system, Via KT400/8235 chipset, XP2000 CPU (10.0 x 166Mhz), 3 x 256MB PC2700 DDR, 64MB AGP Radeon 9200, a few HDs, opticals, etc., OS is W2K SP2 most of the time.
After leaving Task Manager running, with the CPU usage graph, both at normal speed, and underclocked to 850Mhz, I noticed a few things. At normal speed, my usual CPU load for browsing and doing normal computer tasks, rarely ever peaks above 10-15%. Underclocked to 850MHz, it spans the gamut from low to 100% CPU usage, but I still don't notice any lag. (Obviously, playing games while underclocked - like UT2K4, will be slower.)
I think that it really is true, most people nowadays, have computers that are far faster than they need to be, for the majority of the tasks that they do on computers. (Excluding cutting-edge games.)
Perhaps that explains how Intel and major computer OEMs get away with selling so many P4 Celeron systems, and systems with integrated video. Even though an HP desktop system with an NF2 (integrated with GF4MX graphics) and an Athlon XP2500 (maybe Barton) would be so much faster than an Intel Celeron P4 2.8Ghz running on a system with Intel's "Extreme Graphics 2", I wager that the majority of people that know so little about computers, that they would purchase one at a retail store (say, WalMart), wouldn't ever even notice the performance differences, because either choice, would be "more than good enough", for the vast majority of usage scenarios.
It's both an interesting datapoint, and a slightly sad one, from the geek perspective. We always want the fastest and best machines, at a reasonable price, but I'm starting to be forced to agree with some of the editorials on Overclockers.com, that the voice of the geeks is being drowned out by the purchasing power of the "Joe Sixpacks" of the world.
I'm personally waiting for the day, that, like the "identity disks" of the movie 'Tron', we will have "computer personality packs", with our own personalized OS, custom settings, etc., stored in non-volatile storage medium, about the size of a wallet. Computer "stations" will be publically-ubiquitous, and to use one, you just "plug-in" your personal storage and use it for a bit, and then remove it and move on. In this manner, the company providing the "stations", wouldn't have to worry about virus or other malware infecting their terminals, because they wouldn't have any persistent storage to infect, and your own privacy could be likewise ensured, because the system was running completely off of your own personal OS.
A geek pipe dream, to be sure, but it could happen, what with the increasing storage densities of those new microdrives, and some of them even having a bootable USB 2.0 connector on the package.