Ok, we get it already. You hate Bush.

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

PatboyX

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2001
7,024
0
0
Originally posted by: DoubleL
Oh you guys make me feel good, I know I shouldn't be that way, I know what you are going through, I put up with 8 years of the flag burner and know your pain, The one thing is I didn't let it blind me, I don't care what I think of the one setting in the white house this country comes first and I don't care what party you are from, I spent 20 years in the Army was shot in Nam and spent a year in rehab so I paid my part, Oh if a fighter Jet is easy to fly if you are not in combat I think I will still pass, Thanks anyway

what?
 

busmaster11

Platinum Member
Mar 4, 2000
2,875
0
0
So??? Can any gun totin' bush's arse-kissin arrogant repub tell me I'm wrong?

Do you feel we're so strong we're protected if some psycho sleeper cell decides to start snipin' away across the country? Imagine if they knew what they were doing unlike Mohammed and Malvo. Worse yet, imagine what could be worse they could be planning.

Cad? Crimson?

Originally posted by: busmaster11
Originally posted by: Crimson
Not sure why people are quoting the Bill of Rights.. I didn't say any of you didn't have the right to hate him, or speak out against him.. I said its getting old and tiring. You need to come up with SOLUTIONS rather than just saying "The president is ruining our country! He is stupid!"

Well, come up with SOLUTIONS instead of just insults..

Here's some of the facts:

There hasn't been another 9/11 attack since Bush starting dealing with the problem instead of pandering to terrorists like Clinton. As much as people like to say we are angering the world, everyone hates us, they haven't been able to reproduce attacks even remotely close to that. We have also prevented MANY attacks from occuring because of intelligence gained by capturing terrorist leaders.

They haven't been able to? What have we done that prevents a couple lone terrorists from running a nationwide sniper campaign that cripples the country in terror for months on end?

Answer - nothing. bush and the conservatives will only learn the hard way what the rest of us already know - you can't rule by being arrogant SOBs with unilatteral policies.

"We are upsetting our allies". Well, Germany and France have probably been some of our weaker allies to begin with. They need us more than we need them. They also both have been proven to have alternate motives in Iraq.. France especially. As much as all the Bush Haters like to say he is corrupt and has sold out, why do they make no mention of France being corrupt and sold out for oil in Iraq? Oh wait, that doesn't fit your agenda..

My agenda is to keep us honest and responsible. Clearly that conflicts with your arrogance.

 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
Originally posted by: busmaster11
So??? Can any gun totin' bush's arse-kissin arrogant repub tell me I'm wrong?

Do you feel we're so strong we're protected if some psycho sleeper cell decides to start snipin' away across the country? Imagine if they knew what they were doing unlike Mohammed and Malvo. Worse yet, imagine what could be worse they could be planning.

Cad? Crimson?

WTF are you whining about again? And why are you bring me up?

CkG

 

busmaster11

Platinum Member
Mar 4, 2000
2,875
0
0
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: busmaster11
So??? Can any gun totin' bush's arse-kissin arrogant repub tell me I'm wrong?

Do you feel we're so strong we're protected if some psycho sleeper cell decides to start snipin' away across the country? Imagine if they knew what they were doing unlike Mohammed and Malvo. Worse yet, imagine what could be worse they could be planning.

Cad? Crimson?

WTF are you whining about again? And why are you bring me up?

CkG

Just pointing out that we're not invincible, no matter how many countries we dismantle in the name of fighting terrorism or how much we borrow to pour into missile defense sheilds...

And that the whole philosophy of fighting terrorism is wrong - its not about who can build the biggest gun - its about knowing how to stay true and considerate despite dealing from a position of power. Thats all.


 

UCSDHappyAsian

Senior member
Oct 22, 2003
378
0
0
hehe, i dont hate Bush... I still gonna vote for him next election...

but the thing is... he is somewhat dissappointing.
 

Witling

Golden Member
Jul 30, 2003
1,448
0
0
Man, I think of the this as the thread that would not die. Nah, we don't hate Bush. We hate the stupidity that thinks we know more than all the rest of humanity combined and has a solution for world problems that can be expressed in 25 words or less.
 

roboninja

Senior member
Dec 7, 2000
268
0
0
Originally posted by: Boonesmi
Originally posted by: zod
I loathe him as President because, during his administration, he has made much of the world hate the greatest country on earth -- our United States. I've travelled a bit these past few years, and I've got to say, people don't think very highly of us these days.

Bush seriously has to go. What other president has sparked such hatred domestically and abroad?

Plain and simple, he is BAD for this country.

Let's even say its not totally his fault, its still time to fire the coach and move on.

I'm voting for almost anything the Democrats put up in this election, and I suggest if you folks give a rats azz what the rest of the world thinks about us, you do the same.
blah blah

Great comeback. Way to be "typically American".

 

csf

Banned
Aug 5, 2001
319
0
0
I don't think anyone, save maybe one or two posters, in this thread has managed to offer a criticism of Bush without making vast and unsubstantiated claims (HE'S BENT ON DESTROYING THE MIDDLE CLASS!!!!") or resorting to ad hominems against either him or conservatives/Republicans (OOOH Bush is a whore/moron and if you don't agree than you arrogant conservatives LOOOOOOOVE him). I think that's the crux of the matter here. It's not so much what people think so much as their ability to express themselves intelligently and maturely. Nobody's claiming that the conservative posters here are flawless, but it's extremely irritating to see the forum dominated by a handful of anti-Bush posters who either flood the board by starting content-free threads just to insult Bush/republicans and avoiding any actual discussion (thankfully the main culprit got a vacation), act in an extremely melodramatic manner (telling people to calm down is not any sort of violation of one's constitutional rights, sorry), or post nothing but inflammatory one liners.

In serious dicussion, one of the most important things is to show some minimum level of respect for the opposition. Throwing out insults and using childish names to refer to people (calling conservatives "Bushies for example) is not going to help convince anyone that your opinions are valid and well-formed. As I have said earlier, those kind of actions make it look like a good number of the anti-Bush posters are far more interested in trying to annoy people than to win them over.
 

Crimson

Banned
Oct 11, 1999
3,809
0
0
Originally posted by: Whitling
Man, I think of the this as the thread that would not die. Nah, we don't hate Bush. We hate the stupidity that thinks we know more than all the rest of humanity combined and has a solution for world problems that can be expressed in 25 words or less.

Ok, we are back to calling him stupid again.. full circle.
 

Crimson

Banned
Oct 11, 1999
3,809
0
0
Originally posted by: csf
I don't think anyone, save maybe one or two posters, in this thread has managed to offer a criticism of Bush without making vast and unsubstantiated claims (HE'S BENT ON DESTROYING THE MIDDLE CLASS!!!!") or resorting to ad hominems against either him or conservatives/Republicans (OOOH Bush is a whore/moron and if you don't agree than you arrogant conservatives LOOOOOOOVE him). I think that's the crux of the matter here. It's not so much what people think so much as their ability to express themselves intelligently and maturely. Nobody's claiming that the conservative posters here are flawless, but it's extremely irritating to see the forum dominated by a handful of anti-Bush posters who either flood the board by starting content-free threads just to insult Bush/republicans and avoiding any actual discussion (thankfully the main culprit got a vacation), act in an extremely melodramatic manner (telling people to calm down is not any sort of violation of one's constitutional rights, sorry), or post nothing but inflammatory one liners.

In serious dicussion, one of the most important things is to show some minimum level of respect for the opposition. Throwing out insults and using childish names to refer to people (calling conservatives "Bushies for example) is not going to help convince anyone that your opinions are valid and well-formed. As I have said earlier, those kind of actions make it look like a good number of the anti-Bush posters are far more interested in trying to annoy people than to win them over.

Thank you.

 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: csf
I don't think anyone, save maybe one or two posters, in this thread has managed to offer a criticism of Bush without making vast and unsubstantiated claims (HE'S BENT ON DESTROYING THE MIDDLE CLASS!!!!") or resorting to ad hominems against either him or conservatives/Republicans (OOOH Bush is a whore/moron and if you don't agree than you arrogant conservatives LOOOOOOOVE him). I think that's the crux of the matter here. It's not so much what people think so much as their ability to express themselves intelligently and maturely. Nobody's claiming that the conservative posters here are flawless, but it's extremely irritating to see the forum dominated by a handful of anti-Bush posters who either flood the board by starting content-free threads just to insult Bush/republicans and avoiding any actual discussion (thankfully the main culprit got a vacation), act in an extremely melodramatic manner (telling people to calm down is not any sort of violation of one's constitutional rights, sorry), or post nothing but inflammatory one liners.

In serious dicussion, one of the most important things is to show some minimum level of respect for the opposition. Throwing out insults and using childish names to refer to people (calling conservatives "Bushies for example) is not going to help convince anyone that your opinions are valid and well-formed. As I have said earlier, those kind of actions make it look like a good number of the anti-Bush posters are far more interested in trying to annoy people than to win them over.
Thank you.
You mislead people they get rather pissed.



 

busmaster11

Platinum Member
Mar 4, 2000
2,875
0
0
Originally posted by: csf
I don't think anyone, save maybe one or two posters, in this thread has managed to offer a criticism of Bush without making vast and unsubstantiated claims (HE'S BENT ON DESTROYING THE MIDDLE CLASS!!!!") or resorting to ad hominems against either him or conservatives/Republicans (OOOH Bush is a whore/moron and if you don't agree than you arrogant conservatives LOOOOOOOVE him). I think that's the crux of the matter here. It's not so much what people think so much as their ability to express themselves intelligently and maturely. Nobody's claiming that the conservative posters here are flawless, but it's extremely irritating to see the forum dominated by a handful of anti-Bush posters who either flood the board by starting content-free threads just to insult Bush/republicans and avoiding any actual discussion (thankfully the main culprit got a vacation), act in an extremely melodramatic manner (telling people to calm down is not any sort of violation of one's constitutional rights, sorry), or post nothing but inflammatory one liners.

In serious dicussion, one of the most important things is to show some minimum level of respect for the opposition. Throwing out insults and using childish names to refer to people (calling conservatives "Bushies for example) is not going to help convince anyone that your opinions are valid and well-formed. As I have said earlier, those kind of actions make it look like a good number of the anti-Bush posters are far more interested in trying to annoy people than to win them over.

This is what happens when the conservatives continue to flock to any mention of Clinton and his scandals as a defense for the current regime.

To me, there is no respecting a president who from day one has stepped on and disrepected the collective international community (except for Israel, whose butt we're still kissing) and told them they didn't matter.
 

AEB

Senior member
Jun 12, 2003
681
0
0
Originally posted by: Ferocious
I dislike anyone who is bent on weakening or shrinking the middle class.

Therefore I dislike Bush.

In case you didnt see the breakdown on who bush's tax cut would help the middle class benifited most from the cuts, and th elower and upper benifited least. Since the middle class pays most of the taxes this makes sense. But i am curious how bush is bent on weaking or shrinking the middle class.
Keep in mind i make below the poeverty level so i cant speak of how the middle class really is.
 

busmaster11

Platinum Member
Mar 4, 2000
2,875
0
0
Originally posted by: AEB
Originally posted by: Ferocious
I dislike anyone who is bent on weakening or shrinking the middle class.

Therefore I dislike Bush.

In case you didnt see the breakdown on who bush's tax cut would help the middle class benifited most from the cuts, and th elower and upper benifited least. Since the middle class pays most of the taxes this makes sense. But i am curious how bush is bent on weaking or shrinking the middle class.
Keep in mind i make below the poeverty level so i cant speak of how the middle class really is.

Tax cuts didn't benefit anyone. Certianly not the jobless, contrary to bush's claims.

Dual P3's and a P4, kinda nice for someone supposedly below the poverty level... I suppose they were donations... :)

So how about it CRIMSON, assuming you haven't ignored my previous posts, how protected are we?
 

Crimson

Banned
Oct 11, 1999
3,809
0
0
Originally posted by: busmaster11
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: busmaster11
So??? Can any gun totin' bush's arse-kissin arrogant repub tell me I'm wrong?

Do you feel we're so strong we're protected if some psycho sleeper cell decides to start snipin' away across the country? Imagine if they knew what they were doing unlike Mohammed and Malvo. Worse yet, imagine what could be worse they could be planning.

Cad? Crimson?

WTF are you whining about again? And why are you bring me up?

CkG

Just pointing out that we're not invincible, no matter how many countries we dismantle in the name of fighting terrorism or how much we borrow to pour into missile defense sheilds...

And that the whole philosophy of fighting terrorism is wrong - its not about who can build the biggest gun - its about knowing how to stay true and considerate despite dealing from a position of power. Thats all.

Right, if we just REASON with the terrorists, they will leave us alone.. perhaps we could give them a peace quilt or something, that would keep them from blowing up our buildings.

No, we are not invincable.. but I feel a hell of a lot better knowing we are going to kill those that want us dead. Its not how big of gun you have, its how you use it. The terrorist will use it to shoot an innocent person, we will use it to kill them. Very simple really. Would you feel more secure if you have a 50 cal machine gun outside your house during a riot, or a big peace symbol saying MAKE LOVE NOT WAR.. I'll tell you what I'd want.
 

busmaster11

Platinum Member
Mar 4, 2000
2,875
0
0
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: busmaster11
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: busmaster11
So??? Can any gun totin' bush's arse-kissin arrogant repub tell me I'm wrong?

Do you feel we're so strong we're protected if some psycho sleeper cell decides to start snipin' away across the country? Imagine if they knew what they were doing unlike Mohammed and Malvo. Worse yet, imagine what could be worse they could be planning.

Cad? Crimson?

WTF are you whining about again? And why are you bring me up?

CkG

Just pointing out that we're not invincible, no matter how many countries we dismantle in the name of fighting terrorism or how much we borrow to pour into missile defense sheilds...

And that the whole philosophy of fighting terrorism is wrong - its not about who can build the biggest gun - its about knowing how to stay true and considerate despite dealing from a position of power. Thats all.

Right, if we just REASON with the terrorists, they will leave us alone.. perhaps we could give them a peace quilt or something, that would keep them from blowing up our buildings.

No, we are not invincable.. but I feel a hell of a lot better knowing we are going to kill those that want us dead. Its not how big of gun you have, its how you use it. The terrorist will use it to shoot an innocent person, we will use it to kill them. Very simple really. Would you feel more secure if you have a 50 cal machine gun outside your house during a riot, or a big peace symbol saying MAKE LOVE NOT WAR.. I'll tell you what I'd want.

For every terrorist you kill, a hundred will take their place. What then? God forbid you ever look in the mirror. There will always be extremists, but bush and his american arrogance and his unilatteral actions is making terrorism mainstream.

Eventually you'll have to look at what your fearless leader is doing. The only question is whether its before or after half the world is nuked and America is frozen with homeland terrorism.
 

Crimson

Banned
Oct 11, 1999
3,809
0
0
For every terrorist you kill, a hundred will take their place. What then? God forbid you ever look in the mirror. There will always be extremists, but bush and his american arrogance and his unilatteral actions is making terrorism mainstream.

Then we kill 100, then 100,000, then 100,000,000... whatever it takes. American arrogance does not cause terrorism.. People without morals and values, people without value for human life and freedom, people who want to exterminate anyone who disagrees with them cause terrorism.

Stop blaming me for someone thinking that Allah will give them 178 virgins if they strap explosives to their ass and walk into a schoolyard. *I* did not cause that.. That choice can only be made by one person, the person that did it.. and they are evil.

I accept responsbility for my actions.. I blame no one but myself for what I do.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Then we kill 100, then 100,000, then 100,000,000... whatever it takes. American arrogance does not cause terrorism.. People without morals and values, people without value for human life and freedom, people who want to exterminate anyone who disagrees with them cause terrorism.
Sounds like you are describing Paul Wolfowitxz and his Neo Con Brethren
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
Originally posted by: Crimson
For every terrorist you kill, a hundred will take their place. What then? God forbid you ever look in the mirror. There will always be extremists, but bush and his american arrogance and his unilatteral actions is making terrorism mainstream.

Then we kill 100, then 100,000, then 100,000,000... whatever it takes. American arrogance does not cause terrorism.. People without morals and values, people without value for human life and freedom, people who want to exterminate anyone who disagrees with them cause terrorism.

Stop blaming me for someone thinking that Allah will give them 178 virgins if they strap explosives to their ass and walk into a schoolyard. *I* did not cause that.. That choice can only be made by one person, the person that did it.. and they are evil.

I accept responsbility for my actions.. I blame no one but myself for what I do.
wow, sorry but you are a bit thick

 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: busmaster11
Originally posted by: CADkindaGUY
Originally posted by: busmaster11
So??? Can any gun totin' bush's arse-kissin arrogant repub tell me I'm wrong?

Do you feel we're so strong we're protected if some psycho sleeper cell decides to start snipin' away across the country? Imagine if they knew what they were doing unlike Mohammed and Malvo. Worse yet, imagine what could be worse they could be planning.

Cad? Crimson?

WTF are you whining about again? And why are you bring me up?

CkG

Just pointing out that we're not invincible, no matter how many countries we dismantle in the name of fighting terrorism or how much we borrow to pour into missile defense sheilds...

And that the whole philosophy of fighting terrorism is wrong - its not about who can build the biggest gun - its about knowing how to stay true and considerate despite dealing from a position of power. Thats all.

Right, if we just REASON with the terrorists, they will leave us alone.. perhaps we could give them a peace quilt or something, that would keep them from blowing up our buildings.

No, we are not invincable.. but I feel a hell of a lot better knowing we are going to kill those that want us dead. Its not how big of gun you have, its how you use it. The terrorist will use it to shoot an innocent person, we will use it to kill them. Very simple really. Would you feel more secure if you have a 50 cal machine gun outside your house during a riot, or a big peace symbol saying MAKE LOVE NOT WAR.. I'll tell you what I'd want.

OMG, mark this day down, first time ever agreeing with something Crimie says.

Edit: Also to those saying Bush is the reason Terrorism is mainstream, please grow a brain. He may have disturbed the Hornets nest but the Hornets were still there and were still going to sting.



 

maluckey

Platinum Member
Jan 31, 2003
2,933
0
71
I normally avoid politics like I would avoid contracting the Plague, but i see that finally this thread is sorting out the rabid me-too's, and the head-in-the sand idiots, and finally a few "normal' people are speaking up.

Rich v. Poor.....Clinton is rich, Gore is rich, Feinstein is rich, etc., and so are most of the Democratic members of the House and Senate. According to CNN, and Forbes magazine, there are far more rich Democrats in Congress, than Republicans. Bush is rich, Reagan is rich, and so has every president that we've had in this century. This fight is stupid and ill-informed. It shows much about any person that thinks a certain party is for, or against the rich, or poor. Politicains want the power to control, and will do most anything to get that power, regardless of where the power comes from. Just look at Julius Caesar, and his rise to power, as a prime example. Not much has changed in two thousand years, in the world of politics.

As for European allies? Please...They ally with whomever they are in bed with. Pay-to-play so to speak. They could care less about another country, and appeasement is their game. Look at France's history in the twentieth century. They allowed the Czech give-away to the Nazi's, allowed the Austrian expansion of Germany under Hitler, then invited the Nazis in to collaborate with them in their own country. Die on their knees rather than fight like Britain. As far as them backing the war....One would think that after twelve years, and Saddam jerking their chain, along with throwing out the inspectors, that enough time had passed for Iraq to comply with all the U.N. regulations. Maybe they wanted twelve more years? Let's not even talk of Germany in this century. They are on the side that gives in to their demands. Just ask the Czech, French, and Austrian people about this. France and Germany have always had a sick, almost incestuous relationship for over a thousand years. England is not generally liked by either France or Germany, so that explains why they are on-board with the U.S. Russia is owed many billions by Iraq, under oil contracts, and numerous defense contracts. They want their money, and had a strong feeling (likely justifiably so) that the U.S. wouldn't repay debts owed the Russians, mainly because we didn't force the honoring of German debts to countries that supported Germany during WW I, or WW II. So, is alienating the toothless U.N., and fair weather allies a bad thing? I think that we could have used them, but to trust them is not a good idea.

The United States of America, is the greatest, and most powerful nation this earth has ever seen, and to not do what we can to protect ourselves, and our interests will only make the more aggressive and evious countries emboldened to attack us and our interests, when and where they can.
 

dmcowen674

No Lifer
Oct 13, 1999
54,889
47
91
www.alienbabeltech.com
Originally posted by: maluckey
I normally avoid politics like I would avoid contracting the Plague, but i see that finally this thread is sorting out the rabid me-too's, and the head-in-the sand idiots, and finally a few "normal' people are speaking up.

Rich v. Poor.....Clinton is rich, Gore is rich, Feinstein is rich, etc., and so are most of the Democratic members of the House and Senate. According to CNN, and Forbes magazine, there are far more rich Democrats in Congress, than Republicans. Bush is rich, Reagan is rich, and so has every president that we've had in this century. This fight is stupid and ill-informed. It shows much about any person that thinks a certain party is for, or against the rich, or poor. Politicains want the power to control, and will do most anything to get that power, regardless of where the power comes from. Just look at Julius Caesar, and his rise to power, as a prime example. Not much has changed in two thousand years, in the world of politics.

As for European allies? Please...They ally with whomever they are in bed with. Pay-to-play so to speak. They could care less about another country, and appeasement is their game. Look at France's history in the twentieth century. They allowed the Czech give-away to the Nazi's, allowed the Austrian expansion of Germany under Hitler, then invited the Nazis in to collaborate with them in their own country. Die on their knees rather than fight like Britain. As far as them backing the war....One would think that after twelve years, and Saddam jerking their chain, along with throwing out the inspectors, that enough time had passed for Iraq to comply with all the U.N. regulations. Maybe they wanted twelve more years? Let's not even talk of Germany in this century. They are on the side that gives in to their demands. Just ask the Czech, French, and Austrian people about this. France and Germany have always had a sick, almost incestuous relationship for over a thousand years. England is not generally liked by either France or Germany, so that explains why they are on-board with the U.S. Russia is owed many billions by Iraq, under oil contracts, and numerous defense contracts. They want their money, and had a strong feeling (likely justifiably so) that the U.S. wouldn't repay debts owed the Russians, mainly because we didn't force the honoring of German debts to countries that supported Germany during WW I, or WW II. So, is alienating the toothless U.N., and fair weather allies a bad thing? I think that we could have used them, but to trust them is not a good idea.

The United States of America, is the greatest, and most powerful nation this earth has ever seen, and to not do what we can to protect ourselves, and our interests will only make the more aggressive and evious countries emboldened to attack us and our interests, when and where they can.

Nice post maluckey. Basically what I've been posting that both Dems & Reps have bought & corrupted the whole system and they are backed and bought by the Corporations that backed them with the money. We have two Ceasar's and it looks like the people would have to revolt to do the "Etu Brute" manuever. I hope that voting could save the Nation from internal War but it is not looking that way right now in 2003.



 

busmaster11

Platinum Member
Mar 4, 2000
2,875
0
0
Originally posted by: Crimson
For every terrorist you kill, a hundred will take their place. What then? God forbid you ever look in the mirror. There will always be extremists, but bush and his american arrogance and his unilatteral actions is making terrorism mainstream.

Then we kill 100, then 100,000, then 100,000,000... whatever it takes. American arrogance does not cause terrorism.. People without morals and values, people without value for human life and freedom, people who want to exterminate anyone who disagrees with them cause terrorism.

Stop blaming me for someone thinking that Allah will give them 178 virgins if they strap explosives to their ass and walk into a schoolyard. *I* did not cause that.. That choice can only be made by one person, the person that did it.. and they are evil.

I accept responsbility for my actions.. I blame no one but myself for what I do.

Actions that are a result of american arrogance upon a people without the political structure and economic resources to defend themselves can lead to these people taking desperate measures.

If you kill 100 people, only one may be a terrorist. If you kill 100,000,000, maybe only 50 will be terrorists, because as we see today, we're simply not capable of accurately targetting all terrorists only. Many innocent people will be killed. And for every one you kill, ten will dedicate their lives to spreading the word to others to bring you down. Eventually the sentiments will spread to the whole community and beyond. And eventually, one will succeed.

I know you're too arrogant to care what anyone else anywhere thinks of you, but I'm surprised that even a fool such as you will have so little sense as to try to justify killing so many people.

If it weren't for the global media and sensible people surrounding us, people such as you and bush may show your true colors - that your policy of justifying preemptive attack lends you to be no better than Hitler. One day you two may be taught a lesson as well - I just feel sorry that those of us with the humility to understand will also suffer.
 

maluckey

Platinum Member
Jan 31, 2003
2,933
0
71
The so-called global media voted the man you despise, Hitler, Man Of the Year, in 1939 for his forward thinking gun control policies. The forward thinking media, panders to the masses, because they are the ones paying the subsciption rates, and that is a dangerous thing.

Utopian policies of appeasement and goodwill only work when both parties are in agreement, and repect the other sides point of view. The Palestinians have honored what they said they would do, which is to drive out or kill all Jews in Israel. The terrorist cells target whomever stands in their way to percieved freedom of hate. I take it as a compliment that they hate the United States so much. That must mean that we stand against their goals of opression and terror towards thier own people (as evidenced by their brutal and supressive regimes), and their attitudes towards their neighbors.

Do your own research, and stop listening to the politically controlled press, and then, and only then will you get the true picture of what's really going on.