Ok, we get it already. You hate Bush.

Crimson

Banned
Oct 11, 1999
3,809
0
0
Ok, we get it already.. you guys hate Bush.. you would hate him if there were 0 casualties in Iraq, you would hate them if there were 10 million. You would hate him if he supported universal health care, you would hate him if he didn't. You would hate him if he won by 5 million votes, or 10 million, or 100 votes.. you would still hate him. You would hate him if he appointed a black liberal judge to every open position on the courts, you would hate him if he put in a white male. You hate him for not doing enough to prevent 9/11, and you hate him for doing too much. You hate him for lowering taxes, but you would hate him for raising them as well (cough, Bush Sr.). You hate him for trying to get an evil dictator out of office, but you hate him for not going after others. You would hate him if he didn't go to war, because he was not doing enough to protect American interests. You say character doesn't matter for 10 years, and now it does.

It doesn't matter WHAT our President does.. you will hate him no matter what. So stop hiding behind all these stupid anti-war, bad economy, etc postings and just post what you truly feel. If George Bush was Al Gore, nobody would be criticizing him for doing the exact same things Bush is doing. You hate the fact that Bush is President, and you will say ANYTHING he does is somehow illegal, immoral, unjust, etc..

And can you guys PLEASE come up with some criticism of Bush that doesn't include "he's stupid".. that little liberal handbook saying is getting old.. Reagan was stupid, Bush Sr. was stupid, Bush Jr. is stupid.. hmm, whats the common thread there? all Republicans? But wait, Clinton was GOD.. he was SOOO smart, spoke SOOOOO well.. everything about him is just SOOO great.. Yeah, no kidding, he's a democrat and you support him.. So lets stop the Bush is stupid stuff, because it seems to me like you think ANY republican is stupid.

Think about this for a minute, all you Bush haters. What are you going to do if Bush wins re-election? And at this point I think thats a really good possibility. Lets say for the sake of argument that Bush wins 54% to 46%.. Will you then continue on this he is stupid, everything he does is illegal/immoral kick? If 54% of the people agree with him, is he REALLY that stupid? Is he REALLY doing that bad of a job? Lets even say Bush loses the election and gets 46% of the vote.. The fact that nearly 50% of the people still agree with him, despite everything "stupid", "illegal", and "immoral" he does, will still say quite a bit.

Remember, this country is split nearly 50/50 as far as Republican/Democrat votes.. I guarantee you there are nearly 50% of the people of this country who agree with the vast majority of what the President does.. Does that make that 50% of the country immoral, illegal, and stupid? Apparently so.

Anyways, WE GET IT ALREADY.. You hate Bush.. we know! God please, give it a rest for a little while. You will get your chance to get him out at the ballot box in a year.. I can't even imagine how insane you guys are gonna go if he wins re-election.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
I guarantee you there are nearly 50% of the people of this country who agree with the vast majority of what the President does..
In your dreams. Do I hate Bush, no I don't. Do I think he is a good president, again I don't. Do I think Gore would have been better, hard to say but he probably would have been as incompetant. Are the Dems running against him capable of doing a better job? Who knows but I can't imagine them being that much worse. Frankly it doesn't seem like we don't have anyone running for or in office that seems like they are capable of being a good leader.

I was willing to give Bush a chance despite him nominating John Assfsck for AG and sucking up to the Ridiculou..Religious Right, Pandering to the Special Interests like Big Oil and Energy Companies (He all Presidents pander to someone) But when he got up in front of the Nation and Misled us about the imminent threat of Hussien, His alleged ties with Al Queda and linked him to 911 just to fulfill the quest and visions of his Neo Con Handlers that was the straw that broke the Camels Back. I know longer trust what he says.
 

Crimson

Banned
Oct 11, 1999
3,809
0
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I guarantee you there are nearly 50% of the people of this country who agree with the vast majority of what the President does..
In your dreams. Do I hate Bush, no I don't. Do I think he is a good president, again I don't. Do I think Gore would have been better, hard to say but he probably would have been as incompetant. Are the Dems running against him capable of doing a better job? Who knows but I can't imagine them being that much worse. Frankly it doesn't seem like we don't have anyone running for or in office that seems like they are capable of being a good leader.

I was willing to give Bush a chance despite him nominating John Assfsck for AG and sucking up to the Ridiculou..Religious Right, Pandering to the Special Interests like Big Oil and Energy Companies (He all Presidents pander to someone) But when he got up in front of the Nation and Misled us about the imminent threat of Hussien, His alleged ties with Al Queda and linked him to 911 just to fulfill the quest and visions of his Neo Con Handlers that was the straw that broke the Camels Back. I know longer trust what he says.

What if Bush wins 54% of the vote.. will you then still say people don't support him?
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
OK Crimson, we get it already. You love Bush. You have "YABA" tattooed on your ass. You're naming your first born, "Dubya." Blah, blah, blah, whatever.
 
Dec 27, 2001
11,272
1
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I guarantee you there are nearly 50% of the people of this country who agree with the vast majority of what the President does..
In your dreams. Do I hate Bush, no I don't. Do I think he is a good president, again I don't. Do I think Gore would have been better, hard to say but he probably would have been as incompetant. Are the Dems running against him capable of doing a better job? Who knows but I can't imagine them being that much worse. Frankly it doesn't seem like we don't have anyone running for or in office that seems like they are capable of being a good leader.

I was willing to give Bush a chance despite him nominating John Assfsck for AG and sucking up to the Ridiculou..Religious Right, Pandering to the Special Interests like Big Oil and Energy Companies (He all Presidents pander to someone) But when he got up in front of the Nation and Misled us about the imminent threat of Hussien, His alleged ties with Al Queda and linked him to 911 just to fulfill the quest and visions of his Neo Con Handlers that was the straw that broke the Camels Back. I know longer trust what he says.

rolleye.gif
 

bigdog1218

Golden Member
Mar 7, 2001
1,674
2
0
It works both ways so stop crying about it, and stop acting like Bush is some hero above any criticism, I'd rather criticize every president than follow them like a pack of sheep.
 
Dec 27, 2001
11,272
1
0
Originally posted by: bigdog1218
It works both ways so stop crying about it, and stop acting like Bush is some hero above any criticism, I'd rather criticize every president than follow them like a pack of sheep.

Read better. He was saying stop veiling your blind hatred behind anti-war and doom-and-gloom-economy posts. Unless you can post some good things about Bush, then the bad things you post will just be more of the droning whine from the left because your credibility as a commentator of politics is zero if you're just a partisan patsy.
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I guarantee you there are nearly 50% of the people of this country who agree with the vast majority of what the President does..
In your dreams. Do I hate Bush, no I don't. Do I think he is a good president, again I don't. Do I think Gore would have been better, hard to say but he probably would have been as incompetant. Are the Dems running against him capable of doing a better job? Who knows but I can't imagine them being that much worse. Frankly it doesn't seem like we don't have anyone running for or in office that seems like they are capable of being a good leader.

I was willing to give Bush a chance despite him nominating John Assfsck for AG and sucking up to the Ridiculou..Religious Right, Pandering to the Special Interests like Big Oil and Energy Companies (He all Presidents pander to someone) But when he got up in front of the Nation and Misled us about the imminent threat of Hussien, His alleged ties with Al Queda and linked him to 911 just to fulfill the quest and visions of his Neo Con Handlers that was the straw that broke the Camels Back. I know longer trust what he says.

What if Bush wins 54% of the vote.. will you then still say people don't support him?
that will mean that 54% of those who bother to vote preffered him over his challenger but that doesn't mean they think he is doing a great job. Come on,the only reason he won last time is because he was running against the biggest stiff in Politics (well besides himself).

Anyway, just because he happens to be president or happens to win next time you believe that we the American voters shouldn't criticize him?
 

DurocShark

Lifer
Apr 18, 2001
15,708
5
56
Originally posted by: datalink7
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: datalink7
I hate Bush. He is stupid.

Couldn't see that coming. :)

:p

Actually, I don't hate Bush.

I do think he is stupid though ;)

I agree.

Would I vote for him next year? Depends on who's running against him. I'll tell ya, I'm not impressed with the people the Dems are flashing around. I'm waiting for Gray Davis to get nominated! LoL
 

xochi

Senior member
Jan 18, 2000
891
6
81

I actually liked Bush as Govenor of Texas and voted for him during his second run for Gov.

I dont like Bush as president.

Unlike the current Texas Govenor, Rick Perry, Bush really did well bringing Texas Dems and Repubs together. IMHO






 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: bigdog1218
It works both ways so stop crying about it, and stop acting like Bush is some hero above any criticism, I'd rather criticize every president than follow them like a pack of sheep.

Read better. He was saying stop veiling your blind hatred behind anti-war and doom-and-gloom-economy posts. Unless you can post some good things about Bush, then the bad things you post will just be more of the droning whine from the left because your credibility as a commentator of politics is zero if you're just a partisan patsy.
I bet not once in the 8 years of Clintons terms neither you or Crimson ever said one good thing about him. Fine that is your perogative, but don't start passing judgement on those who don't happen to agree with you unless you want to come off as hypocritical as your posts.
 

Gand1

Golden Member
Nov 17, 1999
1,026
0
76
I think you need to read better. Blind hatered is the same as following blindly. It's just the other side of the coin. If we need to stop "hiding" behind our blind hatered you need to stop hiding behind the God fearing loyal sheeps!
 

Crimson

Banned
Oct 11, 1999
3,809
0
0
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: bigdog1218
It works both ways so stop crying about it, and stop acting like Bush is some hero above any criticism, I'd rather criticize every president than follow them like a pack of sheep.

Read better. He was saying stop veiling your blind hatred behind anti-war and doom-and-gloom-economy posts. Unless you can post some good things about Bush, then the bad things you post will just be more of the droning whine from the left because your credibility as a commentator of politics is zero if you're just a partisan patsy.
I bet not once in the 8 years of Clintons terms neither you or Crimson ever said one good thing about him. Fine that is your perogative, but don't start passing judgement on those who don't happen to agree with you unless you want to come off as hypocritical as your posts.

Actually, you won't see very many people calling Clinton stupid.. even Republicans.. Hell, Clinton's politics weren't that bad, because he was actually pretty conservative on many things.. along with the fact that the congress wouldn't allow him to pay anything too bad..

Republican's criticized Clinton, but its not in the same way that democrats are doing it to Bush.. There is hatred toward Bush... I don't HATE Clinton..
 

Crimson

Banned
Oct 11, 1999
3,809
0
0
Originally posted by: xochi
I actually liked Bush as Govenor of Texas and voted for him during his second run for Gov.

I dont like Bush as president.

Unlike the current Texas Govenor, Rick Perry, Bush really did well bringing Texas Dems and Repubs together. IMHO

How is he supposed to bring democrats and republicans together when democrats won't support ANYTHING he does... They are anti-everything bush does..

Does anyone think if Bush raised taxes, that the democrats would IMMEDIATELY use that against him?
 

Crimson

Banned
Oct 11, 1999
3,809
0
0
Originally posted by: Gand1
I think you need to read better. Blind hatered is the same as following blindly. It's just the other side of the coin. If we need to stop "hiding" behind our blind hatered you need to stop hiding behind the God fearing loyal sheeps!

Since we support him, we are blind sheep? Maybe we agree with what he is doing? You guys sure like to label.. Bush = Stupid. People who support him = sheep.

Who are the sheep? Democrats won't support ANY conservative for a federal court position.. republicans granted nearly all of Clinton's appointees. There is a double standard here.
 

SViscusi

Golden Member
Apr 12, 2000
1,200
8
81
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: bigdog1218
It works both ways so stop crying about it, and stop acting like Bush is some hero above any criticism, I'd rather criticize every president than follow them like a pack of sheep.

Read better. He was saying stop veiling your blind hatred behind anti-war and doom-and-gloom-economy posts. Unless you can post some good things about Bush, then the bad things you post will just be more of the droning whine from the left because your credibility as a commentator of politics is zero if you're just a partisan patsy.
I bet not once in the 8 years of Clintons terms neither you or Crimson ever said one good thing about him. Fine that is your perogative, but don't start passing judgement on those who don't happen to agree with you unless you want to come off as hypocritical as your posts.

Actually, you won't see very many people calling Clinton stupid.. even Republicans..
No, they just called him a murderer, rapist, and whatever other name they could think of.


Republican's criticized Clinton, but its not in the same way that democrats are doing it to Bush.. There is hatred toward Bush... I don't HATE Clinton..
Bullshit, Republicans hated (and still do) Clinton with a passion.

 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: Crimson
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
Originally posted by: HeroOfPellinor
Originally posted by: bigdog1218
It works both ways so stop crying about it, and stop acting like Bush is some hero above any criticism, I'd rather criticize every president than follow them like a pack of sheep.

Read better. He was saying stop veiling your blind hatred behind anti-war and doom-and-gloom-economy posts. Unless you can post some good things about Bush, then the bad things you post will just be more of the droning whine from the left because your credibility as a commentator of politics is zero if you're just a partisan patsy.
I bet not once in the 8 years of Clintons terms neither you or Crimson ever said one good thing about him. Fine that is your perogative, but don't start passing judgement on those who don't happen to agree with you unless you want to come off as hypocritical as your posts.

Actually, you won't see very many people calling Clinton stupid.. even Republicans.. Hell, Clinton's politics weren't that bad, because he was actually pretty conservative on many things.. along with the fact that the congress wouldn't allow him to pay anything too bad..

Republican's criticized Clinton, but its not in the same way that democrats are doing it to Bush.. There is hatred toward Bush... I don't HATE Clinton..
"Falls out of chair laughing" You have got to be kidding!! Granted they never called Clinton Stupid because he always came off as an intelligent well informed Leader. Bush on the other hand doesn't dazzle anyone with his mental prowess. That doesn't mean he is a Moron , just a little over his head with his job.
 

DealMonkey

Lifer
Nov 25, 2001
13,136
1
0
Crimson, you're confusing being critical for hatred. I guess it's your perogitive to call it whatever you wish, but it's pretty clear that while some really do hate Bush, most are simply critical of his policies or the administration as a whole. Nice of you to bring up the "hate crime" concept though. Way to over-react. :)
 

Red Dawn

Elite Member
Jun 4, 2001
57,529
3
0
Originally posted by: DealMonkey
Crimson, you're confusing being critical for hatred. I guess it's your perogitive to call it whatever you wish, but it's pretty clear that while some really do hate Bush, most are simply critical of his policies or the administration as a whole. Nice of you to bring up the "hate crime" concept though. Way to over-react. :)
Yeah idiots like sillyTIM and Hagbard do not represent all those who criticize Bush just as fools like Dari don't represent those who like Bush.
 

XZeroII

Lifer
Jun 30, 2001
12,572
0
0
Great post. I feel the same way. I'm not 100% in support of Bush, yet just because I don't say he's stupid and terrible etc... I am labeled as someone who just loves him and I'm a sheep. They are doing the same thing to you.