• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Oh Nose! NASA Rocket Failed!

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,361
17,923
126
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...rocket-fails-falls-into-ocean/article1929815/



March 4, 2011
NASA rocket fails, falls into ocean

By Jessica Gresko
The Associated Press
Taurus XL was carrying a Earth-observation satellite on $424 million mission

A rocket carrying an Earth-observation satellite is in the Pacific Ocean after a failed launch attempt, NASA officials said Friday.
The Taurus XL rocket carrying NASA's Glory satellite lifted off around 2:10 a.m. PST from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California.
During a news conference Friday officials explained that a protective shell or fairing atop the rocket did not separate from the satellite as it should have about three minutes after the launch. That left the Glory spacecraft without the velocity to reach orbit.
NASA suffered a similar mishap two years ago when a satellite that would have studied global warming crashed into the ocean near Antarctica after launching from the same kind of rocket that carried Glory. Officials said Friday that Glory likely wound up landing near where the previous satellite did.
"We failed to make orbit," NASA launch director Omar Baez said Friday. "Indications are that the satellite and rocket ... is in the southern Pacific Ocean somewhere."
Had Glory reached orbit it would have been on a three-year mission to analyze how airborne particles affect Earth's climate. Besides monitoring particles in the atmosphere, it would also have tracked solar radiation to determine the sun's effect on climate change.
Glory was supposed to study tiny atmospheric particles known as aerosols, which reflect and trap sunlight. The vast majority occurs naturally, spewed into the atmosphere by volcanoes, forest fires and desert storms. Aerosols can also come from manmade sources such as the burning of fossil fuel.
The $424-million mission is managed by the NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland.
Friday's launch came after engineers spent more than a week troubleshooting a glitch that led to a last-minute scrub and two years studying what went wrong with the 2009 mission that also crashed.
An accident board was formed to investigate and corrective action was taken to prevent future problems. A duplicate is now scheduled to fly from Vandenberg in 2013.
Investigators spent several months testing hardware, interviewing engineers and reviewing data and documents. The probe did not find evidence of widespread testing negligence or management shortcomings, but NASA declined to release the full accident report, citing sensitive and proprietary information.
 

ElFenix

Elite Member
Super Moderator
Mar 20, 2000
102,402
8,574
126
9 launches, 3 failures. that's not a good record for that vehicle
 

Schadenfroh

Elite Member
Mar 8, 2003
38,416
4
0
When I start constructing rockets to aid my Legions of Terror, I will not use Orbital Sciences Corporation as a contractor. People say Pratt & Whitney are bad, sheesh.

Since this satellite was built to study global warming, no one has mentioned delayed Bush administration era sabotage?
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
When I start constructing rockets to aid my Legions of Terror, I will not use Orbital Sciences Corporation as a contractor. People say Pratt & Whitney are bad, sheesh.

Since this satellite was built to study global warming, no one has mentioned delayed Bush administration era sabotage?

Rumors are Bush was seen near the launch site with a large wrench.
 

highland145

Lifer
Oct 12, 2009
43,973
6,338
136
Rumors are Bush was seen near the launch site with a large wrench.
disney-world-minnie-mickey-bushes.jpg
 

silverpig

Lifer
Jul 29, 2001
27,703
12
81
I LOVE this part

"Indications are that the satellite and rocket ... is in the southern Pacific Ocean somewhere."
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Local news showed the live launch this morning. Received no comment when asking on the "function" of the satellite.
 
Mar 10, 2005
14,647
2
0
Hopefully they can find it and salvage it? I'd imagine the vessel is airtight.

i doubt it. it's not holding a vacuum at sea level, and it's not carrying a pressurized vessel into space for the hell of it. it's not made to survive re-entry, and it's not made to survive the impact. even if it were solid gold, it still wouldn't be worth salvaging.
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,361
17,923
126
Hopefully they can find it and salvage it? I'd imagine the vessel is airtight.

err, no... them tincans, assuming it did not burn up, will hit the water with terminal velocity. Pancake time. :biggrin:
 

Ninjahedge

Diamond Member
Mar 2, 2005
4,149
1
91
Maybe they should start building "OMGWTF emergency packages" on these things so the $50M satelite on the $400M rocket will have a parachute...?

Just a thought.
 

Demo24

Diamond Member
Aug 5, 2004
8,356
9
81
Man, imagine being 'somewhere in the south pacific' and seeing this thing plummet out of the sky at terminal velocity straight into the ocean. :eek:


Theoretically speaking, say it survives reentry and since the capsule is sort of bullet shaped and say it happens to fall in a forward trajectory (ie, not tumbling) I wonder how far down it would go upon impact with the water (assuming of course it would float to the surface), or if it would simply explode. :hmm:
 

sdifox

No Lifer
Sep 30, 2005
100,361
17,923
126
Man, imagine being 'somewhere in the south pacific' and seeing this thing plummet out of the sky at terminal velocity straight into the ocean. :eek:


Theoretically speaking, say it survives reentry and since the capsule is sort of bullet shaped and say it happens to fall in a forward trajectory (ie, not tumbling) I wonder how far down it would go upon impact with the water (assuming of course it would float to the surface), or if it would simply explode. :hmm:

my guess is it shutters, unless you come in at a really small angle and just plow the surface of the ocean. It would still get ripped apart, just not a spectacular SPLAT!


"Officials said Friday that Glory likely wound up landing near where the previous satellite did."

Well, at least we have Reproducibility :biggrin: