• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Oh Nose! NASA Rocket Failed!

sdifox

No Lifer
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news...rocket-fails-falls-into-ocean/article1929815/



March 4, 2011
NASA rocket fails, falls into ocean

By Jessica Gresko
The Associated Press
Taurus XL was carrying a Earth-observation satellite on $424 million mission

A rocket carrying an Earth-observation satellite is in the Pacific Ocean after a failed launch attempt, NASA officials said Friday.
The Taurus XL rocket carrying NASA's Glory satellite lifted off around 2:10 a.m. PST from Vandenberg Air Force Base in California.
During a news conference Friday officials explained that a protective shell or fairing atop the rocket did not separate from the satellite as it should have about three minutes after the launch. That left the Glory spacecraft without the velocity to reach orbit.
NASA suffered a similar mishap two years ago when a satellite that would have studied global warming crashed into the ocean near Antarctica after launching from the same kind of rocket that carried Glory. Officials said Friday that Glory likely wound up landing near where the previous satellite did.
"We failed to make orbit," NASA launch director Omar Baez said Friday. "Indications are that the satellite and rocket ... is in the southern Pacific Ocean somewhere."
Had Glory reached orbit it would have been on a three-year mission to analyze how airborne particles affect Earth's climate. Besides monitoring particles in the atmosphere, it would also have tracked solar radiation to determine the sun's effect on climate change.
Glory was supposed to study tiny atmospheric particles known as aerosols, which reflect and trap sunlight. The vast majority occurs naturally, spewed into the atmosphere by volcanoes, forest fires and desert storms. Aerosols can also come from manmade sources such as the burning of fossil fuel.
The $424-million mission is managed by the NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland.
Friday's launch came after engineers spent more than a week troubleshooting a glitch that led to a last-minute scrub and two years studying what went wrong with the 2009 mission that also crashed.
An accident board was formed to investigate and corrective action was taken to prevent future problems. A duplicate is now scheduled to fly from Vandenberg in 2013.
Investigators spent several months testing hardware, interviewing engineers and reviewing data and documents. The probe did not find evidence of widespread testing negligence or management shortcomings, but NASA declined to release the full accident report, citing sensitive and proprietary information.
 
When I start constructing rockets to aid my Legions of Terror, I will not use Orbital Sciences Corporation as a contractor. People say Pratt & Whitney are bad, sheesh.

Since this satellite was built to study global warming, no one has mentioned delayed Bush administration era sabotage?
 
When I start constructing rockets to aid my Legions of Terror, I will not use Orbital Sciences Corporation as a contractor. People say Pratt & Whitney are bad, sheesh.

Since this satellite was built to study global warming, no one has mentioned delayed Bush administration era sabotage?

Rumors are Bush was seen near the launch site with a large wrench.
 
Rumors are Bush was seen near the launch site with a large wrench.
disney-world-minnie-mickey-bushes.jpg
 
Local news showed the live launch this morning. Received no comment when asking on the "function" of the satellite.
 
Hopefully they can find it and salvage it? I'd imagine the vessel is airtight.

i doubt it. it's not holding a vacuum at sea level, and it's not carrying a pressurized vessel into space for the hell of it. it's not made to survive re-entry, and it's not made to survive the impact. even if it were solid gold, it still wouldn't be worth salvaging.
 
Maybe they should start building "OMGWTF emergency packages" on these things so the $50M satelite on the $400M rocket will have a parachute...?

Just a thought.
 
Man, imagine being 'somewhere in the south pacific' and seeing this thing plummet out of the sky at terminal velocity straight into the ocean. 😱


Theoretically speaking, say it survives reentry and since the capsule is sort of bullet shaped and say it happens to fall in a forward trajectory (ie, not tumbling) I wonder how far down it would go upon impact with the water (assuming of course it would float to the surface), or if it would simply explode. :hmm:
 
Man, imagine being 'somewhere in the south pacific' and seeing this thing plummet out of the sky at terminal velocity straight into the ocean. 😱


Theoretically speaking, say it survives reentry and since the capsule is sort of bullet shaped and say it happens to fall in a forward trajectory (ie, not tumbling) I wonder how far down it would go upon impact with the water (assuming of course it would float to the surface), or if it would simply explode. :hmm:

my guess is it shutters, unless you come in at a really small angle and just plow the surface of the ocean. It would still get ripped apart, just not a spectacular SPLAT!


"Officials said Friday that Glory likely wound up landing near where the previous satellite did."

Well, at least we have Reproducibility :biggrin:
 
Back
Top