Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler
Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler
we measure the expense in terms of homes passed. even in densely populated areas, our expense for ftth would be $5-6000/ home passed. this is due to infrastructure, materials, licensing, and labor. when someone gets cable installed, there is a loss that must be recovered over time. with ftth, that loss is absolutely massive.
how much would you like to pay for the internet? $100/mo.? $300/mo.? more? no? then stfu.
Then please, since you're so knowledgeable, tell us how other countries are doing it. I'm honestly curious to know. Who is this "we" you speak of, by the way.
i will not disclose my employer.
other countries' expenses are a fraction of the US. you should know this.
Originally posted by: MrPickins
* "Up to 1 Gbps" indicates the maximum speed on the access section between the NTT East local switch and the optical network unit (ONU) installed at the subscriber's residence. The transmission speed of the subscriber is up to 100 Mbps. "Up to 100 Gbps" and "up to 100 Mbps" indicate maximum values based on technical standards. The actual Internet connection speed may be lower depending on factors such as the subscriber's usage environment and line congestion.
Sorry to burst your bubble...
Originally posted by: NoShangriLa
Just to let you know, Vietnam opted to pay for the expensive optical cable when they were offered copper for free by the American soon after the US/Vietnam normalized relation during the 90s. Vietnam knew that they would have to suffer the low speed and depends on the American for outdated & expensive support.
Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler
i will not disclose my employer.
other countries' expenses are a fraction of the US. you should know this.
Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler
you're right, i'm talking out of my ass.
just curious, how many other people here have spent the last decade working for a telecom giant? i'm dealing with municipalities and other utilities, designing, constructing and maintaining networks with 1000's of plant miles, performing FCC compliance testing, and fighting my own cheap-ass company every step of the way. so wtf do i know.
edit: i hope you're happy, getting me out of bed to argue with random strangers at 2:30AM.
Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler
you're right, i'm talking out of my ass.
just curious, how many other people here have spent the last decade working for a telecom giant? i'm dealing with municipalities and other utilities, designing, constructing and maintaining networks with 1000's of plant miles, performing FCC compliance testing, and fighting my own cheap-ass company every step of the way. so wtf do i know.
edit: i hope you're happy, getting me out of bed to argue with random strangers at 2:30AM.
Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler
you're right, i'm talking out of my ass.
just curious, how many other people here have spent the last decade working for a telecom giant? i'm dealing with municipalities and other utilities, designing, constructing and maintaining networks with 1000's of plant miles, performing FCC compliance testing, and fighting my own cheap-ass company every step of the way. so wtf do i know.
edit: i hope you're happy, getting me out of bed to argue with random strangers at 2:30AM.
And yet, you can't even tell us who you work for. Did you sign some kind of NDA when you were hired that prevents you from ever stating who your employer is? Lol.
Never mind, though. You lost all credibility when you implied that things are cheaper in Japan than they are in the U.S. This is Japan we're talking about. You know that, right? At one point the real estate in the city of Tokyo alone had a higher book value than the entire Continental United States. You should know this.
Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
And yet, you can't even tell us who you work for. Did you sign some kind of NDA when you were hired that prevents you from ever stating who your employer is? Lol.
Originally posted by: flxnimprtmscl
Originally posted by: The Boston Dangler
we measure the expense in terms of homes passed. even in densely populated areas, our expense for ftth would be $5-6000/ home passed. this is due to infrastructure, materials, licensing, and labor. when someone gets cable installed, there is a loss that must be recovered over time. with ftth, that loss is absolutely massive.
how much would you like to pay for the internet? $100/mo.? $300/mo.? more? no? then stfu.
Then please, since you're so knowledgeable, tell us how other countries are doing it. I'm honestly curious to know. Who is this "we" you speak of, by the way.
