There's a near universal attitude among those on the right side of these issues, who want to preserve their advantage and don't care about the equal rights or respect for others.
"Who cares?"
"Deal with it".
Those phrase make great sense to the people uttering them, and are salt on a wound to the people on the wring side.
That's really how these things work - the good principles like equality come up most when there's an empathetic situation, which happens most when there's some price for people to value it.
Our nation's great principles didn't come from an arrogent power - that was the English. THey cam from our people who had a fresh taste of being on the wrong side of power - and wrote for equality.
Those great sentiments stood the test of time well as mob after mob of Americans became the arrogant group who did what they like, and said to the left our minority 'who cares', and the courts intervened.
Even our founding fathers had no special interest in giving up any religious advantages, but when they stood to gain from a treaty with Tripoli, where reassuring that Muslim natin the US was not a 'Christian nation' like the history in Europe, and enough founding fathers were not exactly Christian (such as Jefferson's cutting all the miracles out of his bible as false), they were willing to say we're not in a treaty.
That wouldn't happen today IMO, too many to offend. ot really stand up to the value of our neutrality as a government.
Instead we just sort of keep an uneasy truce where the constitution isn't changed, but these issues come up, and Republicans get votes by siding with the poor abused Christians who are only 'equal'.
Indeed, evangelical fundraisers make fortunes with the victim industry - there's a war on Christmas!
For too many Americans, long gone is the forgotten pride in our nation of freedom, including our freedom to celebrate our own way that doesn't interfere with others, expresses no 'superiority' or favoritism.
This story is quite typical - a guy who is overzealous and fails to value the freedom of religion, who is in a position to abuse his power by putting one religion on a military product, with the sub-culture in the military who is someone fervent, if not radicalized, for a religious agenda turning a blind eye. Some know of the rabid missionary approach in the Air Force Academy in recent years.
Do we stand up and say 'this is wrong, by showing favoritism to a religioun' as some people and some military say, or do we say 'but we get to enjoy our side getting privilege, so it's ok' as others say?