Come on!
That photo is funny on so many levels.
So now you're painting me as a racist AND a homophobe?
You're reaching here Craig.
You have yet to say you are not meaning "boy" for Jesse Jackson as a racist insinuation. Until you do, there's every reason to view it as what it appears, you trying to 'get away' with it.
It's not that hard for you to say you don't mean that - but you haven't. If you are trying to get away with it, we can expect your next to be excuses why you don't have to say that - not saying it.
I've often seen bigots who hear some reference to killing the target of their bigotry find it 'really funny'.
The reason is, the humor is rooted n the release of their tension at usually having to express these feelings.
Seeing the topic said so openly, the tension just brings on the giggles - and excuses. This is why bigotry 'jokes' are so popular - under the cover of 'jokes' they can say what they can't say more directly.
I'm not reading too much into anything. I asked you a question to help clear up the issue.
You're not answering.
Maybe it's innocent, and your explaining will confirm that, and that's it.
Or maybe you will dodge answering, for another reason.
The stoning gays question is not related, really, just a standard question about your literalist views that could be asked separately. You going to answer?