GasX
Lifer
- Feb 8, 2001
- 29,033
- 6
- 81
So, ritual mutilation of a newborn is required to avoid the cooties later in life?Originally posted by: CRXicannot circumsized = not normal, that ish is nasty, poor kid
So, ritual mutilation of a newborn is required to avoid the cooties later in life?Originally posted by: CRXicannot circumsized = not normal, that ish is nasty, poor kid
Originally posted by: CRXican
Originally posted by: JulesMaximus
Originally posted by: Anonemous
dayum :shocked:
why would he use the mouth?
/shudders....
Our pediatrician explained the procedure to us when our son was born and never at any point did it involve him putting his mouth on my son's genitals. WTF!!! That guy should be in jail. Sicko bastage.
BTW-We decided not to get my son circumcised. His hose is normal.
not circumsized = not normal, that ish is nasty, poor kid
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: CRXican
Originally posted by: ManSnake
Originally posted by: skace
Originally posted by: CRXican
not circumsized = not normal, that ish is nasty, poor kid
Please explain how not circumsized is not normal. I'd love to hear it.
He is a Jew.
I'm not a jew. It's a matter of hygene, plus it looks a lot better.
So you can't be trusted to clean your cock properly. How is that a reason to mutilate your natural state?
And women should have their labia minora trimmed off too, cause it's more hygenicOriginally posted by: BlinderBomber
Originally posted by: DivideBYZero
Originally posted by: CRXican
Originally posted by: ManSnake
Originally posted by: skace
Originally posted by: CRXican
not circumsized = not normal, that ish is nasty, poor kid
Please explain how not circumsized is not normal. I'd love to hear it.
He is a Jew.
I'm not a jew. It's a matter of hygene, plus it looks a lot better.
So you can't be trusted to clean your cock properly. How is that a reason to mutilate your natural state?
Well, I can clean myself fine. And I'm sure if I had foreskin I would have learned to deal with it. But being circumsized is more hygenic, hate to break it to ya.
As for lowering sensitivity... sex is fine by me as it is... but I don't know what it's like otherwise... so I'm okay with that too.
Originally posted by: BlinderBomber
Well, I can clean myself fine. And I'm sure if I had foreskin I would have learned to deal with it. But being circumsized is more hygenic, hate to break it to ya.
Originally posted by: digdugdogg
I heard Howard Stern talking about this. Man, this is gross.
Originally posted by: Lash444
Originally posted by: Vic
Herpes Simplex Virus Type I is cold sores. Type II is the STD. Great fsckin' journalism :roll:
HAHAAHA...
What are you bill clinton? What do you think him putting his mouth down there could be considered as? You realize that HS Type 1 can be transferred to the genitals right?
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Which simplex of herpes is this? It might not be a std, just cold sores. Still, drawing blood by mouth, especially from a freshly cut penis, yea that's just gross.
Originally posted by: SagaLore
Originally posted by: Lash444
Originally posted by: Vic
Herpes Simplex Virus Type I is cold sores. Type II is the STD. Great fsckin' journalism :roll:
HAHAAHA...
What are you bill clinton? What do you think him putting his mouth down there could be considered as? You realize that HS Type 1 can be transferred to the genitals right?
I believe the POINT is that cold stores are transmitted by a simple kiss, where as type II is a virus spread through sexual contact. Yes if you have it on your mouth you can spread it someone else's mouth, but when you have it you know you have it. You can have the cold sores virus and only ever break out once and never know you still can infect others with it.
Originally posted by: acemcmac
anything involving a man's mouth and the genitals of an infant should be illegal.
/thread
