Officials discuss how to delay Election Day...

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

whoiswes

Senior member
Oct 4, 2002
850
0
76
i don't care if bombs are dropping left and right of me - i've fvcking voting on november 2nd.

(been said before, but...) if we don't vote, the terrorists win. dubya wins. rumsfeld wins.

the public, however, loses. and not just the war on terrorism, but the systematic erasure of our freedom (by both terrorists and policiticians)

/screw tinfoil - i got me a titanium hat!
 

pulse8

Lifer
May 3, 2000
20,860
1
81
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Did I say he did bad things? Nope, but he did during his anti-Vietnam briefing after he got back home.

His commanders went on records and said that he was unfit to serve as president.

So he's unfit to serve as president because he was against the Vietnam war? Is it me or does one thing have nothing to do with another? Why would his commanders state after he returned from the war that he was unfit to serve as president? Was he in the running back then as well? :confused:

Bush barely even served in the Vietnam war. Is it better to be a hero in a war you don't agree with or a coward?
 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,461
4
81
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Did I say he did bad things? Nope, but he did during his anti-Vietnam briefing after he got back home.

His commanders went on records and said that he was unfit to serve as president.

So he's unfit to serve as president because he was against the Vietnam war? Is it me or does one thing have nothing to do with another? Why would his commanders state after he returned from the war that he was unfit to serve as president? Was he in the running back then as well? :confused:

Bush barely even served in the Vietnam war. Is it better to be a hero in a war you don't agree with or a coward?

Ask him anything and he will include this snipit
<John Kerry> I served in Vietnam

It seems like that is his only redeeming quality, yet he was against the war...or was he?

The world will never know, such is the flip-floppiness of the Demo presidential wannabe
 

Nitemare

Lifer
Feb 8, 2001
35,461
4
81
Originally posted by: lozina
Originally posted by: Ilmater
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: ShotgunSteve
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: Nitemare
If the American public is stupid enough to elect Kerry, they deserve everything they get...


<---Scurries off to check housing costs in Mexico and Canada

Riiiight, because we've done soooooooo well under Bush. :roll:

Would you have rather had Gore?

Face it the past couple winners of both parties delegations are complete idiots

I'm just saying that Bush hasn't done much, if anything, to improve this country. Kerry may not be a significantly better person to run the country, but I think Bush and his administration have proved that they aren't fit to do so and need to be replaced. When it comes to running the "free world" I don't think anyone deserves a second chance.

In Kerry's case, he doesn't deserve a first chance.


So says everyone he served under while in Vietnam...that's good enough for me.

Link? From what I've read, he did some great things in Vietnam.
Vietnam Vets Against Kerry

Hehe

Veterans For Kerry

LOL, and it is hosted where?
 

pulse8

Lifer
May 3, 2000
20,860
1
81
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Did I say he did bad things? Nope, but he did during his anti-Vietnam briefing after he got back home.

His commanders went on records and said that he was unfit to serve as president.

So he's unfit to serve as president because he was against the Vietnam war? Is it me or does one thing have nothing to do with another? Why would his commanders state after he returned from the war that he was unfit to serve as president? Was he in the running back then as well? :confused:

Bush barely even served in the Vietnam war. Is it better to be a hero in a war you don't agree with or a coward?

Ask him anything and he will include this snipit
<John Kerry> I served in Vietnam

It seems like that is his only redeeming quality, yet he was against the war...or was he?

The world will never know, such is the flip-floppiness of the Demo presidential wannabe

You make good points against John Kerry, but have really not made any for Bush.

What are Bush's redeeming qualities? Alcoholism? Drug abuse?
 

UglyCasanova

Lifer
Mar 25, 2001
19,275
1,361
126
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Originally posted by: pulse8
Originally posted by: Nitemare
Did I say he did bad things? Nope, but he did during his anti-Vietnam briefing after he got back home.

His commanders went on records and said that he was unfit to serve as president.

So he's unfit to serve as president because he was against the Vietnam war? Is it me or does one thing have nothing to do with another? Why would his commanders state after he returned from the war that he was unfit to serve as president? Was he in the running back then as well? :confused:

Bush barely even served in the Vietnam war. Is it better to be a hero in a war you don't agree with or a coward?

Ask him anything and he will include this snipit
<John Kerry> I served in Vietnam

It seems like that is his only redeeming quality, yet he was against the war...or was he?

The world will never know, such is the flip-floppiness of the Demo presidential wannabe

You make good points against John Kerry, but have really not made any for Bush.

What are Bush's redeeming qualities? Alcoholism? Drug abuse?

Neither have redeeming qualities. God I wish we had a viable 3rd party candidate, I am sick of having to choose the lesser of two evils to run my country.
 

DAGTA

Diamond Member
Oct 9, 1999
8,172
1
0
The terrorists are already here. They're in the office of the President of the United States in the form of the coup that calls itself the Bush Administration. Who has REALLY been keeping Americans 'scared' and 'terrified' for three years now? It's the people that keep talking about terror, have terror alerts, have terror levels, take away freedoms in the name of security, etc. etc. etc. Another waste of time posted this. The sheep in this country are too stupid to realize how easily they are lied to and led around.
 

Nocturnal

Lifer
Jan 8, 2002
18,927
0
76
Originally posted by: DAGTA
The terrorists are already here. They're in the office of the President of the United States in the form of the coup that calls itself the Bush Administration. Who has REALLY been keeping Americans 'scared' and 'terrified' for three years now? It's the people that keep talking about terror, have terror alerts, have terror levels, take away freedoms in the name of security, etc. etc. etc. Another waste of time posted this. The sheep in this country are too stupid to realize how easily they are lied to and led around.

I agree.