***Official Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark scores! Thread***

[(sic)Klown12]

MSI Afterburner 2.3.1 has screen capture and video capture built in. You just need to go into settings and setup the hotkeys and file formats. It makes it easy to capture the screenshots. Then you just need to snip it and upload the file.

Using the save HTML file makes it easy to cheat. A person could just edit the HTML to whatever they wanted. Not saying anybody does this, just that it's possible.

Example: Don't add these fake results!



Not like a person would know the difference anyways. Of course this GPU doesn't exist yet....Or does it

Watch that image show up on rumour sites as evidence of AMD's new cards.

 

[BallaTheFeared]

Nearly twice as fast as Titan!

 

[ericlp]

not bad for a 400.00 computer!

 

[Face2Face]

not bad for a 400.00 computer!

1080P + 8XAA Please

 

[ericlp]

1080P + 8XAA Please

Sorry...

here ya go...

Still not bad for the 100 dollar 7770 card! I tried to get it to run at 1080 but for some reason it won't run in the right scale ... I set it for system res that is 1080p but it won't do it... dunno something is mucked up...

 

[Face2Face]

Sorry...

here ya go...

Still not bad for the 100 dollar 7770 card! I tried to get it to run at 1080 but for some reason it won't run in the right scale ... I set it for system res that is 1080p but it won't do it... dunno something is mucked up...

Maybe because you are running it in a windowed mode? And I assume your monitor is 1080P??

 

[ericlp]

Maybe because you are running it in a windowed mode? And I assume your monitor is 1080P??

yes it is 1080p... hey well, at least it didn't crash!

 

[AdamK47]

With my lowly everyday overclocks. +78 core (13MHz x 6) and +100 on the memory for each GPU. No voltage adjustments. At load, the boost settles to 1019MHz for GPU1, 1032MHz for GPU2, and 1058MHz for GPU3.

 

[John Tauwhare]

Looking good Now give those puppies some heat!!

2 x GTX 660 @1100/1600

 

[Face2Face]

^^ Looking good John. Addicting yet? ....

 

[John Tauwhare]

^^ Looking good John. Addicting yet? ....

Already flashed my BIOS for more volts. Is that a bad sign?

 

[futurefields]

Just a reminder folks in order to have scores added to the list you must post a Screenshot.

 

[futurefields]

And do post your core/mem clocks in the proper format so I can copy them down. No +105 this, +63 that, just give me the final clocks (before multiplied).

 

[AndyE]

Experienced significant sample variation with Titan cards, very low sample variation with 7970 cards.

Asus GTX Titan, stock clock: (1920x1080 in windowed mode, Ultra&Extreme setting)
cards were set with EVGA precision to default mode. Fan was set to 75%
Titan_1: 1400 pts (actual speed was 1005 MHz)
Titan_2: 1354 pts (966 MHz)
Titan_3: 1211 pts (836 MHz)
Titan_4: 1226 pts (849 MHz)

compensated with different OC adjustments
Titan_1: +92 MHz = 1097 MHz; 1515 pts
Titan_2: +131MHz = 1071 MHz; 1474 pts
Titan_3: +261 MHz = 1084 MHz; 1500 pts
Titan_4: +260 MHz = 1097 MHz; 1517 pts

The Gigabyte 7970's (GHz edition) were much more coherent
card_1: 936 pts
card_2: 942 pts
card_3: 941 pts
card_4: 939 pts

BTW, OC with 1180/1600 MHz, the result was 996 pts

The reason I checked for sample variation was that with apps that leveraged the 4 Nvidia cards a frequency adjustment of +180 MHz led quite often to stuck drivers while some cards were barely over 1000 MHz. My first assumption was that this behaviour depends on having all cards in one system simultaneously. So I removed all cards, and put them one by one into the very same system. Don't know why they have such a high difference (all cards are Asus GTX Titans)

Do others with multi-NVidia card setups have similar variations in their samples?
Any ideas what could cause this?

Thanks,
Andy

 

[PhIlLy ChEeSe]

removed!

 

[PhIlLy ChEeSe]

removed

 

[Kenmitch]

:thumbsdown:

Check the fullscreen box and try again.

 

[PhIlLy ChEeSe]

Removed my score as the OP does not bother with this thread, so neither will I....................

 

[Rikard]

^^I think we found the cause of the global warming!

Sapphire HD7950 Vapor-X
ASIC 87.7%
1230/1625 MHz @ 1.15 V
Score: 984
FPS: 39.0

I have a momentum 22 in that I need more voltage to go higher on the core, but that makes the VRM too hot, so the OC above is a trade off. Pretty typical high ASIC behaviour isn't it? Does not need high voltage, but also does not respond well to overvolts due to leakage?

 

[Fastx]

I know, i was wondering why i was so lowly same clocks on everything........I'll get a third one so you guys can compair to the over clocked 690's opps I mean Titans ()

Nice score on those CF 7970's@1160.

Just curious why you haven't went from 12.3 to 13.3 drivers.

FWIW (H)

13.3 on TR
On the AMD side we experienced the most increase with the new drivers with CrossFire. Here, we got a 22% performance increase with the new drivers running at 2560x1600 with 2X SSAA. Performance is not only faster, but much more consistent and smoother in framerate. The new drivers greatly improved CrossFire, but not single-GPU, it was minor.

 

[John Tauwhare]

Intel HD grapics 3000, not valid, its only showing one 660 or am I reading it wrong?

Ok, finally got it right. HD 3000 disabled in BIOS. Pushed to the limit @1100/1660 (will not do 1102 or 1662).




EDIT Apr 23rd: replaced MSI AB with EVGA PX and increased to 1.212V, 110% TDP, @1120/1660:
CORRECTION Apr 24th: the Max Boost core number is 1293

 

[PhIlLy ChEeSe]

removed!

 

[stahlhart]

GTX 670 SLI 1267/1795

 

[Fastx]

GTX 670 SLI 1267/1795

Nice score on those SLI 670's and fwiw from the list of scores I have for this test that is the highest I have seen so far for SLI 670's.

 

[PhIlLy ChEeSe]

removed
Waste of time thread!