***Official Unigine Heaven 4.0 benchmark scores! Thread***

futurefields

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2012
6,471
32
91
---------------------------
Sapphire 7950 @ 1100/1500
2e5v0wp.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:

futurefields

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2012
6,471
32
91
That one has people running in different settings and stuff, like for example you posted your score with Normal tessellation but you are supposed to use Extreme tessellation for benchmarking. It would be nice if there is a thread where everyone simply posts their results using the same benchmark settings. And then as they are added I can add them to the bottom of the 1st post, so we have a list.
 
Last edited:

Eureka

Diamond Member
Sep 6, 2005
3,822
1
81
Heaven already comes with a Extreme preset. Why not just use taht?
 

futurefields

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2012
6,471
32
91
Because it uses a "windowed" view which seems to give people wildly different results. The fullscreen test is much more consistent.
 

Fastx

Senior member
Dec 18, 2008
780
0
0
Benchmark setup:

1920x1080, Fullscreen, 8x Anti-Aliasing
Ultra Quality
Extreme Tessellation

Sapphire 3L 7950
1100/1400
1.181v
BP +15
Temp 64c


Notes
I only wanted to try 1100/1400 I don't have VRAM sensors to monitor Vram temp on this card so decided to only take it to 1100/1400 only. This is as high as I had to plan to go (1100) before I bought the card, just interested in a mild oc like the above for games only then back to stock settings 24/7 when not gaming. Don't want to push the card I am really not into max OC.

P3_zpse0998956.jpg


P6_zps3138d67c.jpg
 
Last edited:

Face2Face

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2001
4,100
215
106
Might as well post mine here too.

Capture-2_zpsaf6f3148.png


When I get more time I will try to tweak it and see if I can get a better score. Heaven 4.0 is a lot tougher to run then Valley..
 

futurefields

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2012
6,471
32
91
Balla your results you posted are using different settings, the point is everyone uses the same settings, so one browsing the thread can quick and easy compare.

Please retest using the settings in the OP and replace the old results image with new one, thanks.
 

futurefields

Diamond Member
Jun 2, 2012
6,471
32
91
Might as well post mine here too.

Capture-2_zpsaf6f3148.png


When I get more time I will try to tweak it and see if I can get a better score. Heaven 4.0 is a lot tougher to run then Valley..

Thanks, are these results for the same OC settings listed in your sig? Im going to start compiling the list when i get home from work, will look like -

Score - card/settings - username

And i will post the results in descending order.
 

Face2Face

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2001
4,100
215
106
Thanks, are these results for the same OC settings listed in your sig? Im going to start compiling the list when i get home from work, will look like -

Score - card/settings - username

And i will post the results in descending order.

Makes sense. I forget right now, I think it was 1300/1800 - I will check later tonight. I assume you will post results in your 1st post?
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
ignore the part where it says 1x next to my GPU. I am indeed running SLI. Both cards loaded to ~99%
18934166.jpg



Single Card
72806239.jpg
 
Last edited:

Face2Face

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2001
4,100
215
106
^ Hey Dredd, what clocks were you running in SLI and single card? Nice SLI score BTW!
 

cmdrdredd

Lifer
Dec 12, 2001
27,052
357
126
^ Hey Dredd, what clocks were you running in SLI and single card? Nice SLI score BTW!

1215Mhz Boost, 6732Mhz Memory

Both in SLI and Single I used the same clocks. That's the max my first card can handle without some issues in some game. So I adjusted my second card to boost to the same level.

Card one needs +60 to boost to 1215 and card two needs only +33.
 

Face2Face

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2001
4,100
215
106
Just wanted to confirm my clocks were at 1300/1800.

Come on people let's get benchmarking!!!