OFFICIAL: Post your 3dMark 2003 scores here.

[hollowman]

I guess my score isn't all that bad after seeing how you guys doing.

so long suckas

 

[Spicedaddy]

Woohoo!! A little OCing and I shattered the 5K mark!


http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=22815


5280 with my 9700 Pro @ 391/344

 

[AmdEmAll]

I get 1133 for my score. This benchmark rapes my computer. I get like 1 fps in the Game 2.

I have a Geforce 3 (240/530)
Athlon XP 1600+ @ 1712MHz

 

[Catiaudo]

Not mine, but I thought it was funny Pentium 300

 

[Noid]

W2k SP3 on my AMDbox

Cat 2.5 v 6218 ...... 3576 ------- Visual artifacts (not DX9 compliant - No 4th test)
Cat 3.0 .................. 4973 ------- Some stuttering.
Cat 3.1 .................. 4975 ------- still stutter ... it may just be that its bringing my system to its knees

Observations:

1.) The CPU test2 - trolls lair -- drops my FPS to 1 .. (Yikes!)
2.) Clearly the 2.5 Cat are the way to go for the 8.1 directX developed apps.
3.) Couldnt post my Online results at Futuremark.com. (gotta take my word on the marks)
4.) Sound tests produced odd stereo (maybe my Acoutic Edge doesnt like DX9)

I laffed at the 5 mark ... good score!
__________________________________________ EDIT _____________________________________
I just put a crystal orb on the core. 9700pro now at 360.53c / 339.88m

3dMark03 ....... 5162 ----- trying to get it submitted to futuremark... still cant connect...
(cat3.1)

 

[TheTechnique]

1157 Marks

I have a Althon XP 1700+
512MB PC2100 ram
Asus A7N8X Deluxe Motherboard
Visiontek GeForce3 Ti500 64MB
WinXP Pro
Nvidia 41.09 drivers
Ummmm, nothing else I can think of important... oh ya, I have a WD 80 gig SE 8 meg cache HD

Nothing overclocked...

 

[Yourself]

1802


P4 2.4@3.2
Ti4600 320/733
42.70 Dets


Seems kinda low huh?


Self

 

[Uclagamer_99]

not really that low...half your score comes from like the nature test

 

[bocamojo]

Well, after a little more oc'ing the vid card mem and core (and playing with the direc3d settings in rage3dtweak), I got my score up to 1100 (from 1020). I feel like Scotty on the Enterprise... "She cannot take much more o' this cap'n, she's gonna blow!" That's about all I'm going to get out of this rig. I think my score would be better if I could run that nature test. Wonder how much of a penalty that is...

 

[Yourself]

Originally posted by: bocamojo
Well, after a little more oc'ing the vid card mem and core (and playing with the direc3d settings in rage3dtweak), I got my score up to 1100 (from 1020). I feel like Scotty on the Enterprise... "She cannot take much more o' this cap'n, she's gonna blow!" That's about all I'm going to get out of this rig. I think my score would be better if I could run that nature test. Wonder how much of a penalty that is...

I hear ya...I'm adding extra voltage to every component that will take it


Self

 

[RaynorWolfcastle]

1262 Marks, I think for most tests I may as well order the slides and flip through them really fast.

 

[human2k]

any predictions on my score, (rig see sig)? I should find out in 2 HR 13min, at 9.5k.

 

[BIGGDOG]

Where to DL 3dmark2003 ????????????/

 

[Challenger]

Originally posted by: human2k
any predictions on my score, (rig see sig)? I should find out in 2 HR 13min, at 9.5k.

3345?

 

[jcwagers]

1067

I was hoping for 2k but I'm obviously WAY behind in the hardware scene.

jc

1.2 Tbird(not oc'd)
Radeon 8500 64 meg
512 meg Samsung PC2700

 

[Challenger]

Holy Crap this file is 176MB!!!!!!3DMark was only 39.8MB:Q I pity the dial up users

 

[Ice9]

4880.

Link to Rig in the sig.

 

[PCMarine]

1264 Pitiful

Athlon XP 2100+ (stock)
512mb PC-133 (yes PC-133)
GeForce 4 Ti4200 128mb (stock)

Man it sucks that it doesnt even run test 4 if you dont have dx9 hardware.

 

[DX2Player]

BAW HAH HAH HAAAAAAAAAA! 184 baby!

Amusing since I have 2.53 P4 with 512 RIMM 4200 RDRAM
Only score 184 but can still play UT 2K3 at 1024x768 32bit with 2xAA and 2xAS and highest quality.

 

[Auric]

4284

Celeron 1.1 @ 1500
Radeon 9500 @ 9700
Audigy @ Audigy 2


Anyone else having submission fail?

 

[everman]

31337

 

[PCMarine]

Originally posted by: DX2Player
BAW HAH HAH HAAAAAAAAAA! 184 baby!

Amusing since I have 2.53 P4 with 512 RIMM 4200 RDRAM
Only score 184 but can still play UT 2K3 at 1024x768 32bit with 2xAA and 2xAS and highest quality.

You MUST be running integrated graphics or some god aweful card to score that low

 

[DX2Player]

Originally posted by: PCMarine

Originally posted by: DX2Player
BAW HAH HAH HAAAAAAAAAA! 184 baby!

Amusing since I have 2.53 P4 with 512 RIMM 4200 RDRAM
Only score 184 but can still play UT 2K3 at 1024x768 32bit with 2xAA and 2xAS and highest quality.

You MUST be running integrated graphics or some god aweful card to score that low

Hardly, Geforce2 Ultra, it only supports 7.0 so only can play one test

I oced everything and got a score of 343, but it wont let me submit it.
I saved it but I dont see a way to open the saved results anyware, maybe ill look at read me files



Edit:Finnaly got them posted, MUHAHAHA I have the fastest Geforce2 Ultra score in the world by far

Check it out

 

[human2k]

Originally posted by: Auric
4284

Celeron 1.1 @ 1500
Radeon 9500 @ 9700
Audigy @ Audigy 2


Anyone else having submission fail?

Howd the heck?

Rig:see sig.....and I got only 3271!!! What the heck? How does a celery 1.5 beat an XP 1.84GHZ on DDR266??? Link to your score plzz?

 

[Hardtarget]

wait a sec.. i only have a geforce 4 mx 440, those are based off of the old geforce 2 cores, did they update these babies to direct x 8 or are they still only 7??