Terzo
Platinum Member
- Dec 13, 2005
- 2,589
- 27
- 91
- Nov 30, 2005
- 50,231
- 118
- 116
Who knows. 12th pick or so I believe? Maybe stick with the Webb/Jackson combo platter and grab an O-Lineman for now (our offensive line was kind of shit this year) and wait to see what happens at the end of next year. It's tough because in one hand I'd like them to trade for someone or sign a free agent QB, depending on who is out there (I have this sneaking suspicion McNabb will end up here) since All Day is in his prime right now and we should take advantage, but I also hate going balls out and compromising the future.
KT
IndyColtsFan
Lifer
- Sep 22, 2007
- 33,655
- 687
- 126
IndyColtsFan
Lifer
- Sep 22, 2007
- 33,655
- 687
- 126
Anyone else rooting for Seattle just to see a 7-9 team make the playoffs? A couple years of this and they might actually do something about it.
IndyColtsFan
Lifer
- Sep 22, 2007
- 33,655
- 687
- 126
I want the Rams to win because Seattle is one of those teams I just can't even muster up a nanosecond of "I give a damn" about them. Although now that you mention it, it would be funny seeing a 7-9 team make it.
Homerboy
Lifer
- Mar 1, 2000
- 30,890
- 5,001
- 126
Cheering for the Rams I guess cuz I like Bradford. He's going to be damned good I think.
Homerboy
Lifer
- Mar 1, 2000
- 30,890
- 5,001
- 126
Why do you say that? What do you expect them to do, resign Culpepper?
Well probably more wishfully hoping than anything. I don't want a good QB in the NFC North.
That being said I think he's long for Arizona.
Yes, haha. I would at least like to see the worst division winner not be guaranteed the #4 seed. Maybe have them drop to #5 so they have to play on the road.
Bradford's a cool guy, though. His big-ticket purchase with his 50M was a ping-pong table.
Bradford's going to be great, a franchise guy. But I can't get over a 7-9 team not only going to the playoffs, but hosting the first game.
If Seattle wins, the 7-9 Seahawks will HOST the Saints. The Saints will have to travel to blow out Seattle. Sure, the 8-8 Rams could do the same, but 7-9 would just be that much worse.
If Seattle wins, the 7-9 Seahawks will HOST the Saints. The Saints will have to travel to blow out Seattle. Sure, the 8-8 Rams could do the same, but 7-9 would just be that much worse.
I like the guy a lot. I hope he's smart enough to realize that $50M, call it 25 after taxes and whatever, is at least $1M for the rest of his life on nearly risk free investments. Shit, even on that, he can buy a lot of ping pong tables.
Fingolfin269
Lifer
- Feb 28, 2003
- 17,948
- 34
- 91
Rookies are typically bad. You can't just pull one name and say 'look!'. There are all kinds of factors including supporting cast, schedule, etc. It really doesn't matter, history shows the only thing you want to see out of a rookie is improvement from week to week.
BTW guys I found a prelim 2011 draft order but of course this assumes StL wins...
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2011/01/02/a-sneak-peak-at-the-2011-draft-order/
Fingolfin269
Lifer
- Feb 28, 2003
- 17,948
- 34
- 91
Yeah it's total BS on a competitive level. However, I'm sure the owners will never sign up for something that changes hosting because it's more likely to screw them out of money than help them.
Tebow 859 yds, 57-118 7tds 5ints 199yds rushing 3tds 2fbls 0lost in the last 3 games
thats 1058yds offense 10tds and 5 turnovers in his first 3 career starts on the team that finished 2nd last in the NFL.
Bradfords first 3 games 655yds 5tds 5ints
Sanchez in 09 606yds 4TDs 2ints 1rushTD 4 fumbles 1 lost
Ryan in 08 511yds 2td-2int
Manning in 98 685 2td 8int
Find a rookie QB who put up those types of numbers in their first starts on a team that surrendered over 95 points in those games.
Also a rookie that made a 17 point comeback in his first starts
If anyone's watching now and wants to talk about Bradford's Comp%, give me a fucking break. He's putting the ball where a professional WR should catch it, and these guys all have hands like feet or are so dumb they don't even look for the ball.
I mean, you don't even have to cover these guys. The receivers will do the job themselves.
I mean, you don't even have to cover these guys. The receivers will do the job themselves.
Umm you only have half of Tebows stats to be correct.
He is actually 40/81 for 651 yards passing. 5 TDs and 3 INTs. 199 yards rush, 3tds and 1 fumble.
Fingolfin269
Lifer
- Feb 28, 2003
- 17,948
- 34
- 91
Still as good or better relative to Bradford.
BTW, I'm not trying to say one is better than the other. To be honest I think looking at rookie QB stats and trying to make heads or tails out of it is ludicrous.
Fingolfin269
Lifer
- Feb 28, 2003
- 17,948
- 34
- 91
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 21K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter