Cookie Monster
Diamond Member
- May 7, 2005
- 5,161
- 32
- 86
So you read their review?
What's your conclusion, do you agree with their conclusion?
Do you think it's good that an "unbias" reviewer uses 3/4 of their benches products designed by TWIMTBP? What would you say if reviewers started to use mostly AMD Evolved games only? You would conclude as any reasonable person would, there's obvious bias.
"The performance really is quite amazing and you can see that at times it has no issues competing with the dual GPU Radeon HD 6990 video card from AMD."
It helps when 3/4 of the bench suite are TWIMTBP games. I can see how they would conclude as such..![]()
Regardless of whatever they are claiming now, TT is historically known as pro-NV. See, e.g., their GTS 450 review: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums...e-GTS-450-Cyclone-1GB-Review-Fishy-conclusion
And TT toes the line when it comes to using NV-approved benches.
Well I could bring up the [H] review of the HD 7770 as fishy as hell and you seem to view them as the pinnacle of legit. You know where they shower praise on the HD 7770 with superlatives like perfect for 1080p and amazing even though its slower even overclocked then the gtx 560 ti and 6870 they compare it too. Also many of their articles only test 3 or 4 games and come to conclusions from that. That is just lazy.
Just read the first page of the TT review, they used old drivers (300.83) and did the review with no white paper or any sort of documentation from nVIDIA. Wonder why they were left out in the cold? I mean look at their benchmark suite..
Could be a driver issue with the card stuck in 3d mode showing higher than usual readings at idle. Other reviews will clear that up hopefully.206 vs 127 watts idle? 456 vs 389 load? Even if the PSU weren't that efficient, that's still a major difference in the wrong direction. Seriously? Is TT wrong or is THG is wrong; the are complete opposites as far as perf-per-watt.
Well I could bring up the [H] review of the HD 7770 as fishy as hell and you seem to view them as the pinnacle of legit. You know where they shower praise on the HD 7770 with superlatives like perfect for 1080p and amazing even though its slower even overclocked then the gtx 560 ti and 6870 they compare it to. Also many of their articles only test 3 or 4 games and come to conclusions from that. That is just lazy.
You can buy them on ncix. evga is $499
http://www.ncix.com/products/?sku=69799
Want to see reviews first, 1600P performance with AA is looking like it may be dismal.
Canadians can I can't. I'm buying ASAP because these are going to be $600 before weeks out and I cant even run it until they make a water block. Will sit on shelf like a commodity.
There are leaked guru3d/pcper benchmark graphs also.
If they can deliver for my res I am buying them asap. If you check the stock counts of the models they have in stock there is next to nothing for a new launch. ( the evga shows 6 in stock)
These will likely sell out and stay sold out until they can make more. That or get ripped off by ebay resellers.
First Review is up. Tweaktown beats all LOL.
Review without 2560 MSAA/AF is useless, it looks like at that settings 680 lead will diminish to irrelevant and after ocing both it will be slower. Even if its GPU oc as all as 7970 it won't bring the same performance increases due to being bandwidth bottleneck. It looses a hell of a lot more performance by going from 1080p to 1600p than 7970.
Review without 2560 MSAA/AF is useless, it looks like at that settings 680 lead will diminish to irrelevant and after ocing both it will be slower. Even if its GPU oc as all as 7970 it won't bring the same performance increases due to being bandwidth bottleneck. It loses a hell of a lot more performance by going from 1080p to 1600p than 7970.
