• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

OFFICIAL KEPLER "GTX680" Reviews

Keysplayr

Elite Member
HotHardware
AnandTech
Bit-Tech
Tom's Hardware
Tech Report
Computerbase
HardOCP
Hardware Canucks
TechpowerUp
Hardware Heaven
TweakTown
Hexus
Guru3D
Legit Reviews
PureOverclock
Overclockers Club
Tech Radar
EuroGamer
PC Perspective
Overclock 3D.net
Hightech Legion
AlienBabelTech
Xbit Labs

SLI, Surround/Eyefinity Articles and/or O/C comparison articles:

TechPowerUp 680SLI

Reference 680 Oced vs. MSI Lighting HD7970 OCed
HardwareHeaven

DailyTech

Sweclockers

HardOCP

[URL="http://hexus.net/tech/reviews/graphics/37253-three-screen-geforce-gtx-680-vs-radeon-hd-7970/]Hexus[/URL]

Thank you Russian Sensation for all these review links.


Stuck for good measure. All review links and discussions go in this thread, duplicates will be locked.

Keys, please keep the OP updated as more links arrive. Thanks.

Super Moderator BFG10K.
 
Last edited:
I'm going to keep my eyes out for the minimum framerate comparison, because if GPU boost is just a way to boost already-high fps without affecting minimum framerates, it only serves to make the average look better but won't affect gameplay much.
 
If it is 15% faster (on average) than an hd7970 at 1920x1200 and 2560x1600, I'm sold. When the non-reference cards come. 😀
 
It looks like an interesting card. the physics seemed far less OTT in Ujesh's vid; looking forward to the reviews
 
If it is 15% faster (on average) than an hd7970 at 1920x1200 and 2560x1600, I'm sold. When the non-reference cards come. 😀

That would be awesome, but it sounds a bit optimistic to me. I'd be happy if it's just competitive with 7970, hopefully helping to drive down prices on the high end.
 
I hope there are reviews that chart clocks/time.

I'm actually the most interested in average overclocks since my 7970 can hit 1150 at stock voltage and it would take massive overclocking potential to sway me into buying one.

I really don't think that after considering overclocking potential that the GTX 680's are going to end up noticeably faster if any.

What would be cool is if AMD has a performace driver up their sleeve or even if oem's release new bios's that revamp base clocks speeds. Both long shots, any how.

Bring on the reviews baby!!!
 
I'm actually the most interested in average overclocks since my 7970 can hit 1150 at stock voltage and it would take massive overclocking potential to sway me into buying one.

I really don't think that after considering overclocking potential that the GTX 680's are going to end up noticeably faster if any.

What would be cool is if AMD has a performace driver up their sleeve or even if oem's release new bios's that revamp base clocks speeds. Both long shots, any how.

Bring on the reviews baby!!!
I'd love to see overclocking potential as well. But if it turns out that the GTX 680 is on average running at 5-10% faster due to nvidia's boost during canned benches, I think a lot of people will be sold on a falsehood (or not, depending on what you intend to do with the hardware).
 
K6 let it go. It's over

heaven-barqcj9g.jpg


3dm11-xutjcl.jpg


power6pkef.jpg


bf3-1920_0jckqc.jpg


bf3-2560_0c3kg2.jpg


dirt3-1920nqj6q.jpg


dirt3-2560lujkl.jpg


skyrim-1920f8jif.jpg


skyrim-25605jjz2.jpg
 
K6 let it go. It's over
Let what go? You didn't refute any of my points. Those charts provide example of exactly what I was just stating - they list the clock speeds of the cards, but if nvidia's GPU boost is dynamically overclocking the cards, then that's not accurate, is it?
 
Back
Top