• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

*OFFICIAL* ATOT Grammar school is in session

konichiwa

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,077
2
0
The following is a compilation of some of the most pervasive (certainly not all) grammar mistakes I see on ATOT. Please don't read this as an insult or as my attempt to be aloof; to be honest I couldn't care less whether you heathens speak/write correctly. :)beer: )

However it's disappointing to see how many people seem to have good posts that get flamed or ignored because they can't speak english correctly. Please feel free to add your own suggestions or send them to me!

Speaking and writing is perhaps the most important skill you can have. Without it it is hard to get people to take you seriously. With that said, and without further ado, here are a few tips that I hope will come to your aid next time you post.

  • When to use "who" and when to use "whom"
A general rule of thumb: If you can use "him," you can use "whom." For example, you want to know whether to say:

You talked to who? or You talked to whom?

Replace who/whom with "him" and see if it works: You talked to him? works, as opposed to You talked to he?. If you can use "him," you can use "whom." The correct phrase is You talked to whom?.

A more encompassing rule is that "whom" should be used when you are speaking about a direct object (the object upon which the verb of the sentence is being acted). "Who" should be used when you are using it to speak about a subject (the object in the sentence that is DOING the action).

  • When to use "good" and when to use "well"
Good is an adjective; well is an adverb. If you are using the word to describe an ACTION, you use well: You swam well today. If you are using it to describe a thing or a passive condition, you use good: That pie looks good! or That movie was good.

  • The difference between "its" and "it's"
Its = ownership. Possessive. Used to describe a characteristic of a thing. Microsoft uses its power to push other companies around.
It's = contraction of two words: it is. It's going to be hot today!

  • The difference between "your" and "you're"
Your = ownership. It is the equivalent of "mine" for another person. Your car, your house, your fine girlfriend.
You're = contraction of two words: you are. You're going to the store? You're not too smart -- your brain doesn't work well.

  • The difference between "their" and "there"
Their = ownership. Much like "your." It signifies that a group of people (more than one) owns or possesses something. My parents bought their first house last month. Harry and Sally had their first little bundle of joy today.
There = a place. My foot isn't in my mouth, it's over there.

  • One punctuation mark per sentence, please.
Of course, while it's annoying, a few exclamation points or question marks (but never more than 3) at the end of a sentence are okay to convey a sense of urgency or surprise. But please, don't do this in every sentence. Ever read "the boy who cried wolf?"
Why would you even want him to pull over, you're at fault, you would be paying for the damages in his car!!! Then paying his rental bills!!!!, Then if he sues you for Bodily Injury, you gotta pay that too!!!!.
Very nice indeed. Not only are three exclamation points used thrice in a row, once they are used in the middle of a sentence and twice along with OTHER punctuation! Nice job on the correct choice of you're, however.
 

Workin'

Diamond Member
Jan 10, 2000
5,309
0
0
Why worry about punctuation when it seems most people don't even know the difference between "lose" and "loose". Damn losers! Or is that loosers?
 

brxndxn

Diamond Member
Apr 3, 2001
8,475
0
76
If this doesn't invite tons of grammatically incorrect replies, I don't know what will...
 

KingNothing

Diamond Member
Apr 6, 2002
7,141
1
0
If you really don't care about something, then you couldn't care less.

If you sort of care about something, then you could care less, but that makes for a weak argument. ;)
 

konichiwa

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,077
2
0
Originally posted by: brxndxn
If this doesn't invite tons of grammatically incorrect replies, I don't know what will...

Oh I'm sure it will but I have to forge through anyway ;)

I feel my brain cells crying for oxygen when I try to decipher some of the phlegm I read on here.
 

Yossarian

Lifer
Dec 26, 2000
18,010
1
81
None of those even comes close to the level of ignorance displayed by those who write "could of" and "should of".
 

Kadarin

Lifer
Nov 23, 2001
44,296
16
81
I'm with you in spirit, konichiwa :) Here's a couple more examples:

"should of"
"for all intensive purposes"
 

RossMAN

Grand Nagus
Feb 24, 2000
79,015
431
136
I'm surprised Skoorbie didn't start this thread unless he kidnapped konichiwa and is using his account.

Hmmn.
 

Confused

Elite Member
Nov 13, 2000
14,166
0
0
Originally posted by: KingNothing
If you really don't care about something, then you couldn't care less.

If you sort of care about something, then you could care less, but that makes for a weak argument. ;)

YES! Thank you for saying what i've been saying for months (well, like ever)


Confused
 

konichiwa

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
15,077
2
0
Originally posted by: TommyVercetti
Is "We get signal" wrong usage of grammar?

Not really. I'm assuming you're talking about satellite, or cell signal, or something, as in, We get good signal in my house, but our next door neighbors have had to move their dish several times.

There's nothing wrong with that. It seems a little cumbersome bcause it's so terse but it has everything a sentence needs (subject and verb) and there's not strictly anything wrong with it.
 

TwinkleToes77

Diamond Member
Jul 13, 2002
5,086
1
0
Originally posted by: PipBoy
None of those even comes close to the level of ignorance displayed by those who write "could of" and "should of".

thats why i use 'coulda' and 'shoulda' :p
 

RossMAN

Grand Nagus
Feb 24, 2000
79,015
431
136
Originally posted by: TwinkleToes77
Originally posted by: PipBoy
None of those even comes close to the level of ignorance displayed by those who write "could of" and "should of".

thats why i use 'coulda' and 'shoulda' :p

You forgot 'woulda'.

It's coulda, woulda, shoulda ...
 

TwinkleToes77

Diamond Member
Jul 13, 2002
5,086
1
0
Originally posted by: RossMAN
Originally posted by: TwinkleToes77
Originally posted by: PipBoy
None of those even comes close to the level of ignorance displayed by those who write "could of" and "should of".

thats why i use 'coulda' and 'shoulda' :p

You forgot 'woulda'.

It's coulda, woulda, shoulda ...

oh right.. forgot :) thanks