Originally posted by: crazydingo
http://reviews.cnet.com/PNY_Verto_GeFor...200___256_MB/4505-8902_7-31466288.html
That's not a turbo cache model!!
Turbo cache models are far cheaper and comes only in PCI-e. Dumbass :laugh:
Originally posted by: crazydingo
http://reviews.cnet.com/PNY_Verto_GeFor...200___256_MB/4505-8902_7-31466288.html
That still gets owned by the 9600XT, Dumberass 😀Originally posted by: malG
Originally posted by: crazydingo
http://reviews.cnet.com/PNY_Verto_GeFor...200___256_MB/4505-8902_7-31466288.html
That's not a turbo cache model!!
Turbo cache models are far cheaper and comes only in PCI-e. Dumbass :laugh:
Originally posted by: crazydingo
That still gets owned by the 9600XT, Dumberass 😀Originally posted by: malG
Originally posted by: crazydingo
http://reviews.cnet.com/PNY_Verto_GeFor...200___256_MB/4505-8902_7-31466288.html
That's not a turbo cache model!!
Turbo cache models are far cheaper and comes only in PCI-e. Dumbass :laugh:
Originally posted by: malG
Originally posted by: crazydingo
That still gets owned by the 9600XT, Dumberass 😀Originally posted by: malG
Originally posted by: crazydingo
http://reviews.cnet.com/PNY_Verto_GeFor...200___256_MB/4505-8902_7-31466288.html
That's not a turbo cache model!!
Turbo cache models are far cheaper and comes only in PCI-e. Dumbass :laugh:
AGAIN, NO comparison since they?re not in the same price class. According to Froogle, the 6200 turbo cache models are far cheaper than 9600XTs. Try harder :laugh:
Originally posted by: KristopherKubicki
Since I don't pay for the cards I receive, I have the luxury of making a decision without price being any sort of concern.
Why doesn't Ronin pay for cards?
Kristopher
Originally posted by: PrayForDeath
Lol, looks like this is gonna get locked even before the launch 😀
Originally posted by: Ronin
I have 1 question for M0RPH.
WWYBYWB? And if you weren't, I'd certainly like to see you take a vacation.
We're now down to just a little over 12 hours. These card launches are like...New Years parties or something..it's a trip.
Originally posted by: Ronin
Actually, no. ATi only confirmed to me some specific specs, but never provided a reference card (generally speaking, ATi has been fairly tight fisted when it came to pre-launch of any cards, in the 4 years I've been dealing with them, as compared to nVidia, where I've always gotten reference cards at least 3 weeks in advance).
The perf #'s will be as much a surprise to me as they are you come tomorrow.
Originally posted by: Ronin
Reference cards give me a chance to see and play with the hardware before anyone else does. I can put it through it's paces, provide feedback to whomever provided the card(s) on various things (including, but not limited to, driver problems, IQ issues, etc), and for the most part, most retail cards are based off those designs, so I pretty much get what's out on the market however much time later.
Originally posted by: M0RPH
I'll tell you. 6600GT sells for like $250 at Best Buy. If you assume that X1300XT would sell for $150 at BB, that's a $100 difference. Which one do you think Mr low end computer user is gonna choose?
BTW, this tells me that the 6600GT MSRP is probably $250, not $200.
Originally posted by: fierydemise
Originally posted by: Ronin
Reference cards give me a chance to see and play with the hardware before anyone else does. I can put it through it's paces, provide feedback to whomever provided the card(s) on various things (including, but not limited to, driver problems, IQ issues, etc), and for the most part, most retail cards are based off those designs, so I pretty much get what's out on the market however much time later.
Doesn't it ruin the sense of suspense and then surprise when you finally see the results?
Originally posted by: keysplayr2003
Originally posted by: munky
Supply and demand - I wouldnt want to buy a x1300 for $149 if I can have a 6600gt for $140, unless there are some new features to sway me over. I think we'll see the prices falling pretty fast on those x1300's, and $100-$110 seems like a good price for it.
Again, the 6600gt is in a class of it's own - it's plenty fast for the money, as long as you dont ask too much from it. If a low end x1600 becomes available for ~$170, that will pretty much spell the end of the 6600gt, as I doubt it can compete with one of those, but until then it still a good card for the money.
Sounds about right. What are the supposed specs of the X1600's again? My brain is getting tired. 🙂
Originally posted by: malG
Just read this page twice: http://www.hardwarezone.com/articles/view.php?cid=3&id=1723&pg=8
I'm still shocked that a year old 6600GT 128 MB manhandles the panties off the more expensive and brand new X1300 PRO 256 MB. ATI got raped by old tech :shocked:
Originally posted by: KristopherKubicki
*cough* http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2550 *cough*
Kristopher
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Originally posted by: KristopherKubicki
*cough* http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2550 *cough*
Kristopher
As I said, this launch is already a failure.
and apple! shuffles, 2G minis, tiger, and nanos all available on launch day 🙂Originally posted by: classy
Originally posted by: GTaudiophile
Originally posted by: KristopherKubicki
*cough* http://www.anandtech.com/video/showdoc.aspx?i=2550 *cough*
Kristopher
As I said, this launch is already a failure.
Its not a failure, if and I mean "IF" the cards are truly in the pipeline and will be available in the days to come. I have the same sentiment though, thats why I posted a thread about the availability benchmark. Its time to move past the paper launches and do what Intel and Nvidia has done, real product launches.