PrinceXizor
Platinum Member
- Oct 4, 2002
- 2,188
- 99
- 91
Anybody notice Epic's Tim Sweeney's response to an e-mail over at http://www.beyond3d.com
Paraphrasing....they asked Epic (since they have marketing deal with Nvidia) what they think about Valve's not-so-veiled taunts of Nvidia hardware and where they think Nvidid did, or didn't go wrong in their architecture design....this is the response...
Well isn't THAT an interesting comment.
One way you could take this is....
"Any vendor who inks a deal with a hardware vendor may or may not be tainted by their marketing deal."
or your could read it this way...
"Sure, we know Nvidia's architecture stinks like moldy tangerines, but we aren't going to publically say that, are you nuts!?"
P-X
Paraphrasing....they asked Epic (since they have marketing deal with Nvidia) what they think about Valve's not-so-veiled taunts of Nvidia hardware and where they think Nvidid did, or didn't go wrong in their architecture design....this is the response...
Hi Anthony,
Well, you could run hardware vendor funded benchmarks and interview people like Gabe and I whose companies have signed big marketing deals with hardware companies. Or you could just write some DirectX9 shader code and draw your own independent conclusions. How's your C++ skills?![]()
-Tim
Well isn't THAT an interesting comment.
One way you could take this is....
"Any vendor who inks a deal with a hardware vendor may or may not be tainted by their marketing deal."
or your could read it this way...
"Sure, we know Nvidia's architecture stinks like moldy tangerines, but we aren't going to publically say that, are you nuts!?"
P-X