Originally posted by: user1234
Yes, I saw this article but I think the conclusion above is an understatement - the Ultra chipset is not the SLI chipset with SLI capability turned off - it is identical to the SLI chipset with NOTHING TURNED OFF, the only difference is in its identifcation circuits, which tell other components if it's the Ultra or SLI model. So actually, Anandtech is wrong - NOTHING IS TURNED OFF in the ULTRA chipset itself, it has the same capabilites and functionality as the SLI chipset. But based on the identifying circuit, other components such as the video driver can decide wether they allow the video cards to fully function. So we have a case of a different product - the graphics card and driver - turning some of their functionality off based on identification of other system components, even though the dual graphics cards in SLI setup are compatible with both chipset models. Since all the components are sold separately, this is ILLEGAL. What I mean is that if your system with nforce4 Ultra chipset is capable of supporting SLI, and your rightfully owned graphics cards and driver are CAPABLE of working with this chipset, IT IS UNLAWFUL for the graphics driver, which is part of your rightfully owned grpahics cards, to limit the functionality of the cards without a reasonable and well defined technical reason (such as compatibility issues, etc), which we know there is none (since some versions of the driver allow this). NVIDIA cannot decide to turn off the SLI capabilites of the graphics driver on purpose, unless it was technically not compatible with the system.
anyone want to take up the class action suit ?