flash-gordon
Member
- May 3, 2014
- 123
- 34
- 101
There's a big difference between those 400 TeraScale2 to 512GCN3, and also, what from the first iteration to the last, AMD went just from 32nm to 28nm. If RR is made on the 14nm LPP from GloFo, it's a 55% improvement on size.I am interested in AMD Raven Ridge, but is AMD really increasing the size of the integrated GPU that much? So far, AMD has gone from 400 to 512.
Code:| Processor | CPU cores | GPU shaders | GFLOPS | Memory | |------------------------|---------------------------|-------------------------|--------|-------------| | A8-3870K Llano | 4 10h 3.0 GHz | 400 TeraScale 2 600 MHz | 480 | 2 DDR3-1866 | | A10-5800K Trinity | 2 Piledriver 3.8-4.2 GHz | 384 TeraScale 3 800 MHz | 614 | 2 DDR3-1866 | | A10-6800K Richland | 2 Piledriver 4.1-4.4 GHz | 384 TeraScale 3 844 MHz | 648 | 2 DDR3-2133 | | A10-7890K Kaveri | 2 Steamroller 4.1-4.3 GHz | 512 GCN 2 866 MHz | 887 | 2 DDR3-2133 | | A12-9800 Bristol Ridge | 2 Excavator 3.8-4.2 GHz | 512 GCN 3 1108 MHz | 1135 | 2 DDR4-2400 |
Also, with scales from the better overall CPU, they can now develop two RR with diferent CU and cores count. One mid to low end size with lower core and CU count, and another bigger.
The bigger one is where is HBM, I believe.