Am I the only person thinking this is a majorly positive release for AMD? Some of the performance numbers have been very encouraging. Often taking the outright lead over Intel.
Excel, C-Ray, Adobe Premier, Handbrake, Blender, Cinebench, OpenSSL results were all very competitive. I think there are some great signs for Naples.
i7 7700k is still the king for almost all gaming scenarios, which I think was outside the most "hopeful" people was totally expected. I'd be more interested in seeing how the R5 1500/R5 1300 ($229/$175??) paired with a cheap B350 board stacks up vs say an i5 7600K + Z270 or i5 7400 + H270. AMD may be able to get some honest recommendations for mid-range gaming setups there.
Also the idle power consumption is worth a mention. 1800X is comparable with 4 core Kaby Lake idle numbers. I know my workstation spends a decent percentage of time idle.
"
One interesting new test with this revision of SYSmark gives us the ability to measure how much power is consumed during the SYSmark test run by attaching a Watts Up! power meter. In this case, because of a lot of the time is spent idle (and Ryzen’s idle power draw is exceptional), it has the lowest total power cost of any of the configurations tested."
There are a few negatives, overclocking is predictably poor, it will be interesting to see if some of the lower clocked R5's hit about the same ceiling especially with the B350 chipset and all the processors supporting overclocking. Also some issues with memory latency and BIOS memory compatibility (again not unprecedented). Not enough to take the gloss off for me though. Considering who AMD are competing against, how much money the had to spend and where they started from performance wise this feels like a product they've delivered on. Not Bulldozer 2.0 by any stretch.