• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Official AMD Ryzen Benchmarks, Reviews, Prices, and Discussion

Page 91 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
When reviews first comes when sales start, you know it stinks.
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Ryzen-7-1800X-CPU-265804/Tests/Test-Review-1222033/
http://www.sweclockers.com/test/23426-amd-ryzen-7-1800x-och-7-1700x/

12689

Trolling is not allowed
Markfw
Anandtech Moderator
 
Last edited by a moderator:
LTC8K6 said:
Then how did we get the earlier findings that it was better? Did they not use Windows to test?
Click to expand...
They used workloads that take up all the threads available. No core parking issues with these.
IEC said:
Waiting for someone to do a proper 4K gaming review.
Click to expand...
They will be the same on G4560 and 1800X, because GPU bottlenecks, man.
Head1985 said:
Ryzen have HT bug in games -10-15% performance drop.
Click to expand...
Not enough to explain the deficit. I, as such, assume it is memory latency biting back as well.
 
Could the SMT 'bug' be motherboard related? I hope it's something fixable as it would be great if we could get 6900 equivalent performance while having monster performance in heavily multi-threaded workloads.
 
Hardware.Fr is up:

On Vray Ryzen kills it and goes toe to toe with 6900K at normalized clocks. 1700 will be a steal of a chip for so much throughput.
 
Hopefully by the time they start testing the R1600 and below, they re-do the R1800 to see if new bioses or whatever, fixes up some of these problems.

Also, is Ryzen suffering in all games, or just some select ones?

What I am also interested in seeing is the debate between 6-8 cores vs 4 cores in gaming, using 6-8 cores from both AMD & Intel.

A few days ago, many people seemed convinced that 4 core had seen its best days and 6-8 cores were poised to take over. Is this still the view amongst these people?
 
"The 1800X at its stock clock rate shows up well behind Intel's Core i7-6900K, but to keep things in perspective, you get 87% of Broadwell-E's performance for less than half of its price with Ryzen 7 1800X. Conversely, you can opt for the $350 Core i7-7700K and enjoy more performance than AMD's 1800X in many popular titles"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top