• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Official AMD Ryzen Benchmarks, Reviews, Prices, and Discussion

Page 89 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
overclockersclub - "AMD's guidance on voltage is that 1.35v to 1.45v is the area where a good, long term overclock should be sustainable. Although at the top end of that voltage range we get the warning that using voltages on the high end may come with the consequence of reduced longevity."
 
beginner99 said:
On the other hand till then you will have the 6-core on the market and initial issues (hopefully) worked out. Given what we read in this read being an early adopter ain't going to be a smooth run (manual memory timings...)

And if it is July why not just wait for August and Skylake-X and mabe get it cheaper.
Click to expand...

I was always waiting for 1600X anyway, and was thinking that June-July would be enough time for bugs, Bioses, available mATX or ITX boards with the features that I want, solid benchmarks and pricing, and availability. I'm only wondering that if 1600X, around Aprilish or May is any kind of hit, that stock will be low even in July. We'll see, I guess.

Of course, I also want to know about Vega: small, big, or cut down big Vega. (I'm targeting the 290 or 290X version of Vega...though I guess X would be a further 6 months out, at least?)
 
bjt2 said:
Yes, it's this. I am logged with my google account in google chrome and had no problem viewing it. Probabily is semi-public...
Click to expand...

The problem isn't accessing the PDF, the problem is that it doesn't contain any mention of L3 (at least not the PDF I linked up earlier). Luckily i-know-not provided a link to the slides about the L3 frequency.

I don't know if there is any single source out there that contains all of the Ryzen slides.
 
So its a turd. But at least the performance per watt is in the ballpark.

Trolling is not allowed
Markfw
Anandtech Moderator
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That idle power though... more efficient than even the 7700K @ idle.

index.php


index.php


index.php


index.php


http://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/amd_ryzen_7_1800x_processor_review,23.html

It's priced right for my needs 🙂
 
Yup, something is off with the gaming beches... seems like a hard wall too across the board, something specific is holding it back .. latencies ? (whattabout min/max frames, percentiles etc),
- either way this is going to be dissected on the webs over the coming weeks, looking forward to it.

Also ignore certain posters, they are only here to feed on your grief, dont engange, lets continue to keep it civil.
 
french toast said:
Performance wise looks disappointing aside from power consumption, i mean wow thats impressive, those kinds of numbers look good for server and APUs, i just hope the real reviews look better than that, seems like AT wont as they have done a chunk of benchmarks 2 weeks ago, with the ever improving but dodgy bios that may be reflected in the results.
Really pumped by the efficiency though.
Click to expand...

I had to reread what Ian wrote as I think I misread him the first time. And I think you did, too. He didn't complete the testing two weeks ago. He completed the scripts he will use for the testing two weeks ago.

At least that's how I understood it on a second reading.

EDIT: Nevermind. Looks like your reading and my first reading were correct. He did run them two weeks ago.
 
Ahh damn, just read the sweclockers review. The gaming performance is not good, a 7600k beats it. Just hard to justify buying a zen cpu for gaming even if it might be slightly more future proof. ): was hoping the 1800x would beat the 7700k in gaming benchmarks, but losing to 7600k is not good.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top