Ok, thanks for that.
But you don't know as a fact that AMD went from HD (78) to HP (84) with PR?
No. Its not a fact but my deduction. We will only know when PR launches.
Ok, thanks for that.
But you don't know as a fact that AMD went from HD (78) to HP (84) with PR?
Isn't that for Raven only?
Isn't that for Raven only?
I swear you and fragman are one and the same person lol.We can confirm that Zeppelin used 14LPP High density libraries (CPP=78nm, 9T) from the ISSCC Zen core specification (CPP=78nm, MMP=64nm)
https://www.pcper.com/news/Processors/AMD-Details-Zen-ISSCC
14LPP High performance (9T) and Ultra high performance (10.5T) both use relaxed CPP of 84nm.
https://pc.watch.impress.co.jp/img/pcw/docs/733/713/html/9.jpg.html
btw GF confirmed support of the performance option (which i guess is CPP=84nm) with all of their libraries at 12LP. My guess to the 12LP libraries that PR is built using (MMP=56nm CPP=84nm, 10.5T). I believe 12FDX and 12LP are not arbitrarily named 12nm. They share the same MMP. We already know 12FDX specs
https://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1332328
https://m.eet.com/content/images/eetimes/1 7 12 14 copared x 800_1505972923.jpg
GF has stated 12LP is an optical shrink to Daniel Nenni of semiwiki. All these pieces of information allow me to guess with quite a bit of confidence.
Not sure how much it matters, but the 200GE seems to be the Banded Kestrel embedded chip from what I can gather on the interwebs.Athlon ride again, 200GE Desktop 2/4 APU+Vega GPU or "by price=iGPU performance Pentium 2/4 killer".
https://overclock3d.net/news/cpu_ma...ega_graphics_appears_on_sisoftware_database/1
Not sure how much it matters, but the 200GE seems to be the Banded Kestrel embedded chip from what I can gather on the interwebs.
Not sure how much it matters, but the 200GE seems to be the Banded Kestrel embedded chip from what I can gather on the interwebs.
Wait, wut?Ryzen 3800+ XP, 16C/32T 4.6 Base/5.4 XFR
Probably 16/32 would be BW starved with only two channels.
Athlon Thunderbird... My first CPU. I think the first mainstream x86 CPU at 1GHz+
Pretty sure that's just random speculation, at this point.Ryzen 3800+ XP, 16C/32T 4.6 Base/5.4 XFR
Probably 16/32 would be BW starved with only two channels.
Well, embedded or not embedded it is Desktop APU.If will be only embedded version no problem, or like this Mini-iTX motherboards "with first AMD APU E-350".
Pretty sure that's just random speculation, at this point.
Looking forward to Ryzen+ 2000-series CPUs, AND APUs, soon.
And soon.. Expecting those
Sempron 2C/2T 3.4 Ghz and Vega Graphics Dual Core. Perfect office desktop.
And...
Duron 1C/2T at 3.8 Ghz and Vega Single Core. Ultimate HTPC chip.
Doubtful. Just in the sense that AMD's roadmap has a Zen alternative for just about all BD based CPU solutions and eventually Zen based replacement for Cat core solutions as well. Chances are that they let the model sit in retail till they have a Zen based CPU that replaces it. I could see them bring back Sempron though for some solutions. But outside Athlon that still carries some cache I don't know if AMD is big on looking back like that. I would like to see a Rebirth of Duron personally. It died a beast, instead of being beaten down like Athlon and Sempron.joking aside, they may rebrand the A6-9500 as a Sempron.
Sadly, seems that BD chips are EOL at all... time to move forward... maybe those are rated 15 Watts?joking aside, they may rebrand the A6-9500 as a Sempron.
Sadly, seems that BD chips are EOL at all... time to move forward... maybe those are rated 15 Watts?
Actually 16 and 14 nm are starting to get cheaper and eventually it might be cheaper than 28 nm... So BD might end soon... Unless they release 14 nm BD...EOL never stopped them before, i hope they dont, but considering i can still get A4-7300 and A4-4000 in industrial amounts i have a hard time beliving they will just let BD go.