Do you know the topology of the 4 SOC solution? is it mesh or ring? I assume its ring based of the original Fud leaks around the APU.
Yes. I hope they can use the same platform with vega or nv gfx because that 580 is an inefficient gpu.
incorrectThe A12 was pointless to put into a notebook.
incorrectNo one would have bought that A12 notebook, because there were better alternatives.
because that solves everyone's use case and budget for a laptop... brilliantGet a far better Intel chip and match with a discreet GPU for far better performance.
incorrect
Don't know what your on about, the physical options are clearly detailed in the 17h reference model http://support.amd.com/TechDocs/54945_PPR_Family_17h_Models_00h-0Fh.pdfNow that we know for sure that the Zeppelin die has 32 PCIe lanes, is it feasible to see a refreshed Ryzen (2XXX) next year with all lanes unlocked?
Can the current motherboards support it?
Maybe the motherboard makers kept it a secret and already added the needed extra traces that can be activated with a bios update in the future?
Am I nuts?
There are 32 physical interfaces to use for SATA, PCI-e, nvme, chip set.
As I haven't found anything else either just a guess: As AM4 is prepared for APUs the missing lanes may be reserved for use with the iGPU (which obviously doesn't exist in the current Ryzen models).All I found was this: "Max PCIe/module: 24 lanes" on page 28. I also know that SATA, USB, nvme etc already use these 24 lanes, thus 8 other lanes are inactive.
You're bringing an interesting point, that some pins on the boards might be reserved for the PCIe lanes that take the iGPU signal to the video output ports. You might be right if that's how things work.I'm not talking about the 8 lanes being reserved on Zeppelin dies, just AM4 boards. The Threadripper and EPYC boards are not prepared to output the video of APUs, AM4 boards are.
There's no proof of that happening (leaks), at least not in the near future because the die would be more than 300 mm2, too big, thus too expensive for the market. Raven Ridge APU is just one CCX at around 220 mm2, Ryzen (2 CCXs) is 195 mm2 so no room for extra iGPU.desktop APUs will have to contain two CCXs
The 1400 is still dual CCX's it just has half the cache disabled on both CCX's. The timing of the R3 makes me think that the R3 could be single CCX chips but even then could be RR with the GPU disabled. But you are right it's part of the uncore.The PCIe lanes are not connected to CCX's. Its separate subsystem of the chip. For example Ryzen 5 1400 is 4C/8T CPU, made from single CCX, and it still has 32 PCIe lanes.
Or just adjustments for the inventory channel. I'd guess the 1700 is selling quite a bit better than either X model.Looks like Ryzen 7 prices have received a cut on Newegg.
1700 - 315$
1700X - 350$
1800X - 460$
The 1800X recieved the cut a week or so back. Positioning for ThreadRipper?
Looks like Ryzen 7 prices have received a cut on Newegg.
1700 - 315$
1700X - 350$
1800X - 460$
The 1800X recieved the cut a week or so back. Positioning for ThreadRipper?
It's an official price cut:
https://www.techpowerup.com/233966/amd-trims-prices-of-the-ryzen-7-1700-and-1700x
Remember that Crossfire demo? It was apparently a ThreadRipper demo. And you dare question AMD doing something meaningless? Haha.Yeaa they could and the results would be meaningless then. Whats the purpose then? I dont find it likely.
It's an official price cut:
https://www.techpowerup.com/233966/amd-trims-prices-of-the-ryzen-7-1700-and-1700x
1700X may be worth picking up on a deal, now.
Dang, price cuts two months after release are not an indicator that things are well for Ryzen.