Some amazing power charts ~ https://www.legitreviews.com/amd-ryzen-7-1800x-1700x-and-1700-processor-review_191753/12

The perf/watt of the 65W TDP R7 1700 is out of this world, just amazing.Some amazing power charts ~ https://www.legitreviews.com/amd-ryzen-7-1800x-1700x-and-1700-processor-review_191753/12
![]()
That's going to be money in the bank for AMD. Imagine Naples and Raven Ridge, when they don't have to clock to the moon.The perf/watt of the 65W TDP R7 1700 is out of this world, just amazing.
R7 1700 = 51,03fps / 124W = 0.4115
Core i7 7700K = 42,32fps / 154W = 0.2748
Core i7 6900K = 57,68fps / 204W = 0.2827
Now that there is finally an affordable processor with more than four cores I hope game studios are pushed to better optimize their games for more cores. We know what well threaded games should look like - BF 1, for example. We just need reviewers to call games out that don't take advantage of it.You can also quite clearly see what games have really good threading and which ones are subpar. Hint the ones with good threading AMD is really close.
Seriously. It happened about 10 years ago and it was called Conroe, and it was every bit as of an amazing jump for Intel as Zen is for AMD.That is the poorest analogy I've ever seen anybody come up with.
The problem is they have to build the game around a large amount of hardware and more then 4 cores have been around for awhile on amd's side and this never happened.Now that there is finally an affordable processor with more than four cores I hope game studios are pushed to better optimize their games for more cores. We know what well threaded games should look like - BF 1, for example. We just need reviewers to call games out that don't take advantage of it.
Hopefully SenseMI and Pure Power will correct the issues of CPU throttling when the iGP was fully stressed. Because the cpu perf/w is really good at low clocks. Tiled rasterization and HCC can help on Vega to better utilize the iGP (remember CPUs and GPUs arent yet there in regards of knowing WHY they are being pegged at 100% on a certain power state, thus they go to the next one without knowing if the high load is beacuse of the memory subsystem collapsing, this happens a lot on iGP gaming when if memory bandwith isn't there, the iGP bottlenecked tries to boost all the way to P0 thinking it's a core clock problem when in reality the performance will stay lower because of insufficient bandwith) and thus manage power states better, without soffocating the TDP entirely on the GPU and balancing it out with the CPU.That's going to be money in the bank for AMD. Imagine Naples and Raven Ridge, when they don't have to clock to the moon.
Core was more of a disruption because gaming benchmarking was more straightfoward at that time. You either had a fast core or you didnt and it reflected very clearly on framerates. Now with multithreading is more of a mixed bag and you can have cases of Ryzen beating 7700K and other cases where IPC and clockspeed trumps everything.Seriously. It happened about 10 years ago and it was called Conroe, and it was every bit as of an amazing jump for Intel as Zen is for AMD.
The 6900k is already better than the 7700k in gaming, if you actually look into it instead of going with the urban myth built by Intel's marketing. The problem is that the 1800x is too far behind the 6900k- ofc it's minimal at realistic resolutions.The problem is they have to build the game around a large amount of hardware and more then 4 cores have been around for awhile on amd's side and this never happened.
Granted it was the fx series so maybe we shouldn't count that.
In either case it would be nice for more games to do this but it would hurt their sales and design costs.
I donot see how though. CPU and GPU talk to each other using specific standard protocols. for AMD CPU and GPU to have a "special bond" they would need a new set of protocols and both drivers and game codes will have to be optimized for those new ports too. At the same time, the standard protocols will also have to be present to allow users the options to choose a Nvidia GPUs as well. this also will result in the making of specialized silicon implementation in both CPU and GPU which may no be utilized if an AMD GPU is used with intel or nvidia GPU is used with AMD.So in the next iteration of their GPUs, will we see really great results of the CPU and GPU working in harmony? I guess I want to believe that to be true.
cool! can i suggest using a frame counter to record GPU usage and CPU usage as well as min and max fps while in multiplayer please.Took 1 hr of bf1 64m amien and sait q. Scar, operations, with a team that really clustered together and pushed on the points. Not a single dip on the counter even the most insane situations. Leages above what my i5 ib 4.2 could muster that was often in the 20ties when a team played like that on those maps. Damn fine subjective experience and the counter agrees. It did what i bought it for and can even handle handbrake fast.
Recommended for bf1 addicts. I am sure this is a fine cpu even in 3 years time. It got tons of horsepower.
Played with r7 1700 on 3.8, 1.33v, 2667c16 ram setting.
Need i say they got whipped !
Took 1 hr of bf1 64m amien and sait q. Scar, operations, with a team that really clustered together and pushed on the points. Not a single dip on the counter even the most insane situations. Leages above what my i5 ib 4.2 could muster that was often in the 20ties when a team played like that on those maps. Damn fine subjective experience and the counter agrees. It did what i bought it for and can even handle handbrake fast.
Recommended for bf1 addicts. I am sure this is a fine cpu even in 3 years time. It got tons of horsepower.
Played with r7 1700 on 3.8, 1.33v, 2667c16 ram setting.
Need i say they got whipped !
It can be better in a 1700 vs 1600X scenario. Comparing 1800X and 1600X is absurd as the former costs almost 2x as the latter.A German site tested 8C, 4+2C, 2+2C and 4+0C in 4 games.I don't speak German so can't help with translations.
http://www.pcgameshardware.de/Ryzen-7-1800X-CPU-265804/Tests/Test-Review-1222033/
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
It doesn't prove much though as with 2+2 the data flow between the 2CCX would be heavier than with 4+4.
It also shows that 8 cores is better than 6 so all in all, don't expect too much from 6 and 4 cores SKUs as more cores is better even if most think the opposite.
https://twitter.com/BitsAndChipsEng/status/837429476237651968Zin, I swear upon all things both holy and not, that if AMD fixes these performance issues I will **eat my Ryzen box** and post proof right here in this thread.
It can be better in a 1700 vs 1600X scenario. Comparing 1800X and 1600X is absurd as the former costs almost 2x as the latter.
do not forget the GPU usage is lower in intel than it is on AMD while the fps is lower for AMD. lolhttp://cdn.overclock.net/a/a3/a3bc7675_Capture1.PNG
Joker posted 720P benchmark and any idea Why does Ryzen have 5300Mb memory but 7700K => 1736mb ?
Was only noting that as some expect same gaming perf due to similar clocks at stock and the wrong belief that the number of cores doesn't matterIt can be better in a 1700 vs 1600X scenario. Comparing 1800X and 1600X is absurd as the former costs almost 2x as the latter.
Seems like a pointless analysis.do not forget the GPU usage is lower in intel than it is on AMD while the fps is lower for AMD. lol
also 8 thread at 95% is a bottleneck on Intel, with a total usage of 760%. while the AMD has 70% on average on 16 threads or 1120%.
Computerbase was noting a huge diff in gaming perf due to BIOS.. https://www.computerbase.de/2017-03/amd-ryzen-1800x-1700x-1700-test/2/https://twitter.com/BitsAndChipsEng/status/837429476237651968
I expect proof to be presented in a timely fashion.
Except there are a lot of optimizations to be made, as I am sure you are aware by the article you just posted, and this was done at 720p with an enthusiast gpu.Was only noting that as some expect same gaming perf due to similar clocks at stock and the wrong belief that the number of cores doesn't matter