Originally posted by: CraigRT
god be with the people who are affected!!!
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: CraigRT
god be with the people who are affected!!!
If God cared about the people who are about to be affected, he wouldn't be hitting them with GIANT EARTHQUAKES.
(God doesn't exist)
Originally posted by: glenn beck
91TTZ, grow up
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: glenn beck
91TTZ, grow up
I am grown up, and have grown up beliefs. I don't believe in the Easter Bunny, Santa Claus, or some all knowing, all powerful diety who is supposed to love people more than any person possibly can, yet randomly kills people, leaving their friends and family searching for a nice fuzzy reason to justify that killing.
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: Accipiter22
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Luckily this one is only 1/8th as powerful as the last one.
it thought every .1 was 10x as powerful, so like an 8.3 is 10x an 8.2, and an 8.4 is 100x an 8.2.? Maybe I"m wrong
I think the intensity increased by 10x for every whole number. So an 9 is 10x as powerful as a 8
Saying that God doesn't exist without presenting proof is not really saying anything.Originally posted by: FrustratedUser
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: CraigRT
god be with the people who are affected!!!
If God cared about the people who are about to be affected, he wouldn't be hitting them with GIANT EARTHQUAKES.
(God doesn't exist)
![]()
Originally posted by: russianpower
Saying that God doesn't exist without presenting proof is not really saying anything.Originally posted by: FrustratedUser
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: CraigRT
god be with the people who are affected!!!
If God cared about the people who are about to be affected, he wouldn't be hitting them with GIANT EARTHQUAKES.
(God doesn't exist)
![]()
Originally posted by: hevnsnt
Originally posted by: russianpower
Saying that God doesn't exist without presenting proof is not really saying anything.Originally posted by: FrustratedUser
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: CraigRT
god be with the people who are affected!!!
If God cared about the people who are about to be affected, he wouldn't be hitting them with GIANT EARTHQUAKES.
(God doesn't exist)
![]()
and saying that he does without proof doesnt prove anything either.
Originally posted by: russianpower
Saying that God doesn't exist without presenting proof is not really saying anything.
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: CraigRT
god be with the people who are affected!!!
If God cared about the people who are about to be affected, he wouldn't be hitting them with GIANT EARTHQUAKES.
(God doesn't exist)
Originally posted by: hevnsnt
Originally posted by: russianpower
Saying that God doesn't exist without presenting proof is not really saying anything.Originally posted by: FrustratedUser
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: CraigRT
god be with the people who are affected!!!
If God cared about the people who are about to be affected, he wouldn't be hitting them with GIANT EARTHQUAKES.
(God doesn't exist)
![]()
and saying that he does without proof doesnt prove anything either.
Originally posted by: russianpower
Originally posted by: hevnsnt
Originally posted by: russianpower
Saying that God doesn't exist without presenting proof is not really saying anything.Originally posted by: FrustratedUser
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: CraigRT
god be with the people who are affected!!!
If God cared about the people who are about to be affected, he wouldn't be hitting them with GIANT EARTHQUAKES.
(God doesn't exist)
![]()
and saying that he does without proof doesnt prove anything either.
So until either side presents evidence to back up their point that either God exists or doesn't exist, these kinds of provocative statements shouldn't be posted.
Originally posted by: Taggart
The tsunami should have hit by now, right?
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Taggart
The tsunami should have hit by now, right?
Looks like this was an aftershock and not a true Earthquake so looks like no Tsunami out of this.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Taggart
The tsunami should have hit by now, right?
Looks like this was an aftershock and not a true Earthquake so looks like no Tsunami out of this.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Taggart
The tsunami should have hit by now, right?
Looks like this was an aftershock and not a true Earthquake so looks like no Tsunami out of this.
Originally posted by: SarcasticDwarf
I love how none of the news stations have fact checkers any more. Even the BBC is calling it a possible "tidal wave."
Originally posted by: mobobuff
Originally posted by: SarcasticDwarf
I love how none of the news stations have fact checkers any more. Even the BBC is calling it a possible "tidal wave."
They've sacraficed specificity and accuracy for quickness of release.
