- Aug 4, 2000
- 29,172
- 2,036
- 126
The fiscally responsible party?
Which party is that one? They both seem to be a race to see who can deficit spend the most with stimulus payments this year.
I did criticize the President for deficit spending (in fact I've always been critical of deficit spending) during one of the greatest stock market runs during any four year term. I could see a $3,000,000,000,000 injection to help while we froze the nation in a futile attempt to stop a virus spread, but doubling that amount and more just doesn't add up to me.
Is seems as though no matter what we are hell bent to add so much national debt during good times and bad to do otherwise is unthinkable. The crybabies have been in control since 2008. They want zero rates, they want out of control spending and if they dont get it they will crash the stock market. And it seems nobody has the stomach for that......yet many want cheaper entry points....and nobody likes to overpay for stocks.
As I said just a few posts ago, I think we need to ween ourselves off big government spending and continue to adapt and cope to a "pandemic economy". Even Darwin knew that only the strong survive, but since 2008 the only game we know is to rack up debt.
If we have to borrow any more money it should be as small and targeted as possible.
Hell our city is in complete debt crisis because they guaranteed city workers a 7% interest on their retirement plans. That means when the stock market has a year of 23%, it meets that 7% quota. When the market has a bad year, and stocks go DOWN by 5% for the year - the city is deemed that they have to foot the bill to compensate their retirement plan to make it 7%.
You would have to be financially retarded to come up with something that insane
I did criticize the President for deficit spending (in fact I've always been critical of deficit spending) during one of the greatest stock market runs during any four year term. I could see a $3,000,000,000,000 injection to help while we froze the nation in a futile attempt to stop a virus spread, but doubling that amount and more just doesn't add up to me.
Is seems as though no matter what we are hell bent to add so much national debt during good times and bad to do otherwise is unthinkable. The crybabies have been in control since 2008. They want zero rates, they want out of control spending and if they dont get it they will crash the stock market. And it seems nobody has the stomach for that......yet many want cheaper entry points....and nobody likes to overpay for stocks.
As I said just a few posts ago, I think we need to ween ourselves off big government spending and continue to adapt and cope to a "pandemic economy". Even Darwin knew that only the strong survive, but since 2008 the only game we know is to rack up debt.
If we have to borrow any more money it should be as small and targeted as possible.
^
This is reason I dont go to P&N anymore. The arrogance and presumptuousness is mind blowing. He assumes something based on things I did not say, extrapolates what he thinks I know and twists it into an ugly, vulgar reply.
Wheres the civility?
full self driving
I just try to focus on the big picture. No matter who wins the election tomorrow, the future is green energy, electric vehicles, AI, and full self driving. And China.
that's the holy grail as far as i'm concerned
it'll change my life and the lives of so many people
Presidents have way less to do with the economy than people give them credit for. Presidents can nudge the economy in a direction or another. But they can't alter fundamental trends, make limited resources magically appear, prevent new diseases, stop people from being creative, change laws themselves, etc.But thats why I laugh at this election - regardless of who wins - the status quo will go on.
Yup, FSD will be game changer. Think about the transport and the trucking industry. And general population. It'll free up people so they can sleep, eat, browse internet, work, relax, etc. And Robotaxi that will put Uber and Lyft out of business. I'm confident Tesla will be the first to solve FSD sometime this decade. I expect Chinese EV companies like Xpeng to quickly follow Tesla lead in FSD.that's the holy grail as far as i'm concerned
it'll change my life and the lives of so many people
No system will be perfect so there will be plenty of accidents. But if there are less accidents than before with human drivers, then that's a win. But you're right. The biggest hurdle for FSD will be regulators and lawmakers.Insurance, legal companies, and police would fight it tooth and nail. No more DWI's... no more revenue for lawyers.... virtually little to no wrecks so insurance rates would plummet.
Bars would celebrate though - no reason to hold people back on drinks I guess unless they die from alcohol poisoning.
Yup, FSD will be game changer. Think about the transport and the trucking industry. And general population. It'll free up people so they can sleep, eat, browse internet, work, relax, etc. And Robotaxi that will put Uber and Lyft out of business. I'm confident Tesla will be the first to solve FSD sometime this decade. I expect Chinese EV companies like Xpeng to quickly follow Tesla lead in FSD.
No system will be perfect so there will be plenty of accidents. But if there are less accidents than before with human drivers, then that's a win. But you're right. The biggest hurdle for FSD will be regulators and lawmakers.
And Robotaxi that will put Uber and Lyft out of business
.... And what happens to all those millions of jobs lol
.... And what happens to all those millions of jobs lol.