JTsyo
Lifer
- Nov 18, 2007
- 12,025
- 1,131
- 126
I envy you guys that got on AMR, up 67%, WOOT!
Oh shucks, would have been 100% returns. Wasn't worth the risk to hold on to that though.
I envy you guys that got on AMR, up 67%, WOOT!
Now sitting on 75% cash. Was getting uncomfortable sitting on earnings from a 10-20% rally. With my luck, it'll keep rallying past Christmas, but it just feels like something's about to give.
"OMFG, Euro-credit crisis solved, now investors focused on fact that Europe is already in recession and dragging the world with it"?
Oh shucks, would have been 100% returns. Wasn't worth the risk to hold on to that though.
Now sitting on 75% cash. Was getting uncomfortable sitting on earnings from a 10-20% rally. With my luck, it'll keep rallying past Christmas, but it just feels like something's about to give.
"OMFG, Euro-credit crisis solved, now investors focused on fact that Europe is already in recession and dragging the world with it"?
Yeah man, "Pump 'n Dumps" are risky. It very easily could've gone to zero. This stuff is literally 100% manipulated by tricking people.
Oh shucks, would have been 100% returns. Wasn't worth the risk to hold on to that though.
The real question is it 67% return on a few thousand dollars. or 67% return on 100K or more dollars.
Anyone can make a 67% return gambling a small pot of money. The real test is generating 67% returns on large sums of money. :biggrin:
If you took 100K and made it into 167K then I would be more impressed.
I always thought 67% was 67%. Thanks for clearing that up for me, I feel so stupid now.
Actually its not,you do seem pretty ignorant if you dont understand the concept. But that is not surprising though most people don't either. Its just due to lack of education on your part. College and HS does not do a very good job of teaching people basic finances/investing in this country.
Solve for x, using your obviously superior education:
x = .67
I'll wait.... :whiste:
I believe what Hugo is trying to say is this...
Trying to make 67% on $500 invested capital is like buying a lottery ticket with pocket change. Who cares if you lose it..but trying to make 67% on $100,000 invested capital is risking losing a lot of money...
Think McFly..Think
What if 500 is all you have in the first case and you lose everything. In the second case you're a billionaire and you lose 100K... The guy losing the 500 is going to care more, but thanks for playing Biff.
No one is a billionaire around here. Getting ridiculous in an effort to make someone look like an @ss is backfiring. If you don't see the logical context and perspective of the original point, you probably shouldn't be trying to play 'who's the fool' to feel smarter.
I think I made a mistake. I think I hsould have dumped some of my USG and moved it into GE.
Wow. Just looked at GE's 1 year chart - it's nearly identical to Citigroup's. The spreads between peaks and troughs are moderately smaller, but the risk should be lower too. Unfortuantely, I don't know what GE does aside from lightbulbs, appliances, and apparently miniguns.
My volatility and risk ETF is up over 10% today. Fack yeah.