JMapleton
Diamond Member
- Nov 19, 2008
- 4,179
- 2
- 81
Hey, when did you get your CFA charter? Ohh wait, I'm sure you don't have one. Better yet, you work in banking, right? Ohh wait, I'm sure you don't.
I frequently comment on stocks online and I do not wish to reveal my profession or qualifications for legal reasons, but if I did, you'd feel pretty dumb right now. Everything on here is my personal opinion.
Even better, why don't you show me a peer reviewed empirical and statistically relevent study that shows superior long-term returns from TA.
Impossible question to answer and misleading question, most effective technical analysis is not consistent over long periods of time and most popular forms of TA are nonsense. Bollinger bands and MACD is what the average Joe knows about, but most successful TA is done with custom made computer trading systems written from scratch for individual stocks or sectors.
The problem with most studies is this: They use one or a group of popular methods over an entire range of stocks.
Fact: Certain methods of trading only works are certain times for certain stocks and sectors.
Better yet, tell that to Buffet's bank account.
Has nothing to do with this discussion. There is more than one way to make money in the markets.
TA is bullshit. There isn't one peer reviewed, empirical study, that has shown superior long-term gains for TA over FA or other methods.
See comment above. All TA does not work all the time for every stock.
Looking in the rearview mirror for value is a fools proposition and the market has shown it.
Incorrect. The stock market never changes because humans never change and humans create the prices, the bubbles and the trenches. Everything that is happening now has happened before numerous times, although not exact, it's happen in a similar and predictable way.
Go ahead, focus on some bullshit "resistance level" while the basic fact remains that RMBS has several cashflows about to come into PV, resulting in higher valuations. Yet, let's ignore REALITY and focus on historical stock movements that have no basis on present valuations.
Let me guess, you've never even read Seth Klarmann?
Iron clad fact: Modest temporary changes in fundamentals of a company are not reliable predictors for short term prices.
Secondly, TA should never be used without taking into consideration changes in economic conditions or fundamental conditions of a company. TA should never be used alone.
You and those who study got it all wrong because you misunderstand how and when TA should be used. You imply that every method of TA is always valid for every stock and is applied all in the manner.
TA is like a martial art, it's to be applied different ways at different time against different objects.
Is it not something you can study because it's dependent on the judgement of the one using it, that's why there is no study proving it to be effective.
Last edited: