***Official*** 2008 Stock Market Thread

Page 33 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Originally posted by: Naustica
First Starbucks is not a fad. Fad doesn't last for decades. Second, you guys have no idea how tough restaurant business is and specifically the coffee shop business. Sure anyone can open a coffee shop but how many are even going to last a year.

Possible play on SBUX is to buy at around $15.50. Stop loss at $15. Sell at $17. 50 cent risk for possible $1.50 reward. But this market is brutal. Nothing I'm trying is currently working or works for long. That's telling me my style of trading doesn't work in this type of market and I need to step back or we're close to a turning point. It's definitely frustrating and one of the toughest market I've traded.

GM got it's head taken off today after a what seemed like a positive reversal yesterday. That's just brutal.

Starbucks is not a fad. But SBUX stock is crap. Stop loss is worthless in this volatile market. It's also worthless if there is a shoe drop. Are you really trying to time SBUX stock from 15 to 17?

Their business is in a decline. Stock prices are based on future GROWTH. Hence, shitty stock.
 

ponyo

Lifer
Feb 14, 2002
19,688
2,811
126
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Naustica
First Starbucks is not a fad. Fad doesn't last for decades. Second, you guys have no idea how tough restaurant business is and specifically the coffee shop business. Sure anyone can open a coffee shop but how many are even going to last a year.

Possible play on SBUX is to buy at around $15.50. Stop loss at $15. Sell at $17. 50 cent risk for possible $1.50 reward. But this market is brutal. Nothing I'm trying is currently working or works for long. That's telling me my style of trading doesn't work in this type of market and I need to step back or we're close to a turning point. It's definitely frustrating and one of the toughest market I've traded.

GM got it's head taken off today after a what seemed like a positive reversal yesterday. That's just brutal.

Starbucks is not a fad. But SBUX stock is crap. Stop loss is worthless in this volatile market. It's also worthless if there is a shoe drop. Are you really trying to time SBUX stock from 15 to 17?

Their business is in a decline. Stock prices are based on future GROWTH. Hence, shitty stock.

That's what makes a market. Nope, I'm not currently trading the stock. That's how I would trade if I was trading it from the long side. I would buy it for my long term holding but I'm drowning in CarMax at the moment so I don't need another consumer retail stock. I rather buy more CarMax.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Originally posted by: Naustica
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Naustica
First Starbucks is not a fad. Fad doesn't last for decades. Second, you guys have no idea how tough restaurant business is and specifically the coffee shop business. Sure anyone can open a coffee shop but how many are even going to last a year.

Possible play on SBUX is to buy at around $15.50. Stop loss at $15. Sell at $17. 50 cent risk for possible $1.50 reward. But this market is brutal. Nothing I'm trying is currently working or works for long. That's telling me my style of trading doesn't work in this type of market and I need to step back or we're close to a turning point. It's definitely frustrating and one of the toughest market I've traded.

GM got it's head taken off today after a what seemed like a positive reversal yesterday. That's just brutal.

Starbucks is not a fad. But SBUX stock is crap. Stop loss is worthless in this volatile market. It's also worthless if there is a shoe drop. Are you really trying to time SBUX stock from 15 to 17?

Their business is in a decline. Stock prices are based on future GROWTH. Hence, shitty stock.

That's what makes a market. Nope, I'm not currently trading the stock. That's how I would trade if I was trading it from the long side. I would buy it for my long term holding but I'm drowning in CarMax at the moment so I don't need another consumer retail stock. I rather buy more CarMax.

You want to buy more of a used car dealership with a 20 PE? Hmm, in fact Carmax looks like a good short candidate.
 

Capitalizt

Banned
Nov 28, 2004
1,513
0
0
I'm almost certain that stocks are pricing in an Obama presidency now.. Wall Street knows Obama is going to win, and they need to price in the coming income tax hike, as well as the hike in capital gains taxes from 15% to 28%. This is going to be a HUGE blow to the market and the smart money knows it. I think we may see a small bounce from here for purely technical reasons...but my "gut" feeling says in order to be fairly valued for 8 years of liberalism/socialism, we still need a 20-25% haircut across the board. It doesn't matter how strong the fundamentals are...All companies are going to be effected by bad government policies, and their prices must reflect that.
 

imported_Lothar

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2006
4,559
1
0
Originally posted by: Naustica
First Starbucks is not a fad. Fad doesn't last for decades. Second, you guys have no idea how tough restaurant business is and specifically the coffee shop business. Sure anyone can open a coffee shop but how many are even going to last a year.

Are you saying that McDonalds, Burger King, Dunkin Donuts, Krispy Creme, 7-Eleven, "insert any other fast food restaurant here", and Walgreens new coffee businesses won't last a year?

If so, please explain.
Those companies have nothing to lose. They already have the physical store presence and don't need to sign any new leases or open any new shops.

Does it really cost that much for McDonalds to bring a coffee stand into their existing stores? :confused:
The coffee stands at McDonald stores are self serve(all the one's I've been to). Unlike Starbucks, they don't need to hire any employees to operate it.
You pay by the cup at MCD. Again why pay $4 for a cup of coffee at Starbucks when you can go to McDonalds and get one for <$2 with unlimited refills?
Because it's the experience. That's all there is to it. Starbucks coffee certainly doesn't taste any better than McDonalds or Dunkin Donuts coffee.
 

ponyo

Lifer
Feb 14, 2002
19,688
2,811
126
Originally posted by: JS80
You want to buy more of a used car dealership with a 20 PE? Hmm, in fact Carmax looks like a good short candidate.


It's a great short candidate given the current market trend, financial woes, current company struggles, and the chart. In fact, about 20% of the float is short. If you're looking to trade this, short side is the way to go.

Why do you care about the current PE? Didn't you just say stock prices are based on future GROWTH?

My time horizon with this one is little different than yours. I see the big picture potential and this company will come out of this stronger and with larger marketshare. I'm willing to suffer short to intermediate term pain for the big reward.
 

alphatarget1

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2001
5,710
0
76
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Azurik
Originally posted by: Jadow
Went all in on C last friday at $16.98, hopefully 30 years from now I'll look back on that as an epic decision.

or an Epic Failure ;)

No, seriously, good luck. I think we may have a bounce in the short-term, but I'm not sure C is done with their troubles. I've been bearish on C for quite some time now. I wrote sometime earlier that if I were to own a bank, I'd buy Goldman Sachs. I miss the chance when they were trading down to $140-$150's, but we may see them dip that low if financials continue to post steep losses.

C, WB, BAC are all fool's gold right now. Avoid like the plague. At least one of those 3 will fail in the next 18 months. GS might be killing it right now with their traders reaping profits from oil and shorting the market. Even so their level 3 assets have zero visibility and may be full of shit.

IMO GE is a POS too. Great businesses? Maybe. But look at that toxic ass balance sheet.

SBUX is a POS too. McD is going to kill them. Imagine all the locations McD has. Imagine them remodeling a corner of the restaurant and building a mini "cafe" and sell premium coffee at cutthroat prices. In that case SBUX will bk.

None of the banks you mentioned will outright "fail". Actually I can see C cutting up into smaller pieces. BAC's fundamentals aren't too bad besides the CFC acquisition (and they paid much less than WB paying for Golden West). Feds "bailed out" BSC, and there is no way the Feds will sit by and watch and let any one of the banks to fail (I happen to own two of the 3 and they're getting rammed). They hold too much deposits...

Only a part of GE's business is in financials. I think their alternative energy stuff will bring in pretty good profits.

My uncle and I talked about SBUX and he mentioned that SBUX is more like a lifestyle compared to McD, either way I'm staying on the sideline now.

Fail, as in bk, fail or bailed out. Bailing out = fail. And in the case of bailing out, I can guarantee you equity holders will not get the "sweet" deal BSC holders got. Bail out = depositors are safe, but equity holders get nothing after debtholders.

I just don't see the really big banks fail. Small and medium banks that are heavily exposed in the subprime mess will go under, but I just can't imagine a bank like C to "fail" according to your definition.
 

alphatarget1

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2001
5,710
0
76
Originally posted by: Lothar
Originally posted by: Naustica
First Starbucks is not a fad. Fad doesn't last for decades. Second, you guys have no idea how tough restaurant business is and specifically the coffee shop business. Sure anyone can open a coffee shop but how many are even going to last a year.

Are you saying that McDonalds, Burger King, Dunkin Donuts, Krispy Creme, 7-Eleven, "insert any other fast food restaurant here", and Walgreens new coffee businesses won't last a year?

If so, please explain.
Those companies have nothing to lose. They already have the physical store presence and don't need to sign any new leases or open any new shops.

Does it really cost that much for McDonalds to bring a coffee stand into their existing stores? :confused:
The coffee stands at McDonald stores are self serve(all the one's I've been to). Unlike Starbucks, they don't need to hire any employees to operate it.
You pay by the cup at MCD. Again why pay $4 for a cup of coffee at Starbucks when you can go to McDonalds and get one for <$2 with unlimited refills?
Because it's the experience. That's all there is to it. Starbucks coffee certainly doesn't taste any better than McDonalds or Dunkin Donuts coffee.

Krispy Creme is screwed last time I checked...
 

ponyo

Lifer
Feb 14, 2002
19,688
2,811
126
Originally posted by: Lothar
Originally posted by: Naustica
First Starbucks is not a fad. Fad doesn't last for decades. Second, you guys have no idea how tough restaurant business is and specifically the coffee shop business. Sure anyone can open a coffee shop but how many are even going to last a year.

Are you saying that McDonalds, Burger King, Dunkin Donuts, Krispy Creme, 7-Eleven, "insert any other fast food restaurant here", and Walgreens new coffee businesses won't last a year?

If so, please explain.
Those companies have nothing to lose. They already have the physical store presence and don't need to sign any new leases or open any new shops.

Does it really cost that much for McDonalds to bring a coffee stand into their existing stores? :confused:
The coffee stands at McDonald stores are self serve(all the one's I've been to). Unlike Starbucks, they don't need to hire any employees to operate it.
You pay by the cup at MCD. Again why pay $4 for a cup of coffee at Starbucks when you can go to McDonalds and get one for <$2 with unlimited refills?
Because it's the experience. That's all there is to it. Starbucks coffee certainly doesn't taste any better than McDonalds or Dunkin Donuts coffee.

You really think any of the above companies are really taking longterm marketshare away from Starbucks? I guess that's where we disagree. People will cut back and substitute in hard times but most will come back eventually when it gets better. I guess you're not a coffee drinker.

Lother, let's just come back to it in couple of years. I know your position and you know mine. We know this company has over saturation problem right now in the US and the economy is not helping their $4 fancy coffee latte cause but I believe they will recover and be stronger than ever with added international growth.
 

ponyo

Lifer
Feb 14, 2002
19,688
2,811
126
Originally posted by: Capitalizt
I'm almost certain that stocks are pricing in an Obama presidency now.. Wall Street knows Obama is going to win, and they need to price in the coming income tax hike, as well as the hike in capital gains taxes from 15% to 28%. This is going to be a HUGE blow to the market and the smart money knows it. I think we may see a small bounce from here for purely technical reasons...but my "gut" feeling says in order to be fairly valued for 8 years of liberalism/socialism, we still need a 20-25% haircut across the board. It doesn't matter how strong the fundamentals are...All companies are going to be effected by bad government policies, and their prices must reflect that.

You could be right. Many are saying it's going to take at least 5 years for this debt cycle to fully unwind and prices are going to be lot lower across the board in all equities when it's finally said and done. Might be right. I plan on continuing to put money into my longterm stock holding and keep buying.

Healthcare management stocks are definitely trading like Obama as the president.
 

alphatarget1

Diamond Member
Dec 9, 2001
5,710
0
76
Originally posted by: Naustica
Originally posted by: Lothar
Originally posted by: Naustica
First Starbucks is not a fad. Fad doesn't last for decades. Second, you guys have no idea how tough restaurant business is and specifically the coffee shop business. Sure anyone can open a coffee shop but how many are even going to last a year.

Are you saying that McDonalds, Burger King, Dunkin Donuts, Krispy Creme, 7-Eleven, "insert any other fast food restaurant here", and Walgreens new coffee businesses won't last a year?

If so, please explain.
Those companies have nothing to lose. They already have the physical store presence and don't need to sign any new leases or open any new shops.

Does it really cost that much for McDonalds to bring a coffee stand into their existing stores? :confused:
The coffee stands at McDonald stores are self serve(all the one's I've been to). Unlike Starbucks, they don't need to hire any employees to operate it.
You pay by the cup at MCD. Again why pay $4 for a cup of coffee at Starbucks when you can go to McDonalds and get one for <$2 with unlimited refills?
Because it's the experience. That's all there is to it. Starbucks coffee certainly doesn't taste any better than McDonalds or Dunkin Donuts coffee.

You really think any of the above companies are really taking longterm marketshare away from Starbucks? I guess that's where we disagree. People will cut back and substitute in hard times but most will come back eventually when it gets better. I guess you're not a coffee drinker.

Lother, let's just come back to it in couple of years. I know your position and you know mine. We know this company has over saturation problem right now in the US and the economy is not helping their $4 fancy coffee latte cause but I believe they will recover and be stronger than ever with added international growth.

I can see people not willing to shell out a lot of money for coffee and a lifestyle when the economy is down... I guess we'll see.
 

Engineer

Elite Member
Oct 9, 1999
39,230
701
126
Originally posted by: Capitalizt
I'm almost certain that stocks are pricing in an Obama presidency now.. Wall Street knows Obama is going to win, and they need to price in the coming income tax hike, as well as the hike in capital gains taxes from 15% to 28%. This is going to be a HUGE blow to the market and the smart money knows it. I think we may see a small bounce from here for purely technical reasons...but my "gut" feeling says in order to be fairly valued for 8 years of liberalism/socialism, we still need a 20-25% haircut across the board. It doesn't matter how strong the fundamentals are...All companies are going to be effected by bad government policies, and their prices must reflect that.

LOL. The market has been booming under Bush and the 6 years of GOP Congressional rule....er...wait. S&P and Nasdaq are down and the Dow is up around 700 points....in 7.5 years. Great returns there. Both my and my wifes Roth IRAs, which have been contributed for 5 years on a dollar cost average method, both went negative (her's finally today) for the entire 5 year term. Great booming markets under the GOP. Obama (or almost any other Democrat) couldn't do any worse than "The Lyin King" Bush.

Whether you admit it or not, the stock market usually does well under a Democrat and history shows that.

Pander your politics and political beliefs in P&N, not here. This wasn't a stock market post, this was a reflection of your dislike of anything Democrat and Obama in general.
 

hiromizu

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2007
3,405
1
0
Originally posted by: Naustica
Originally posted by: Lothar
Originally posted by: Naustica
First Starbucks is not a fad. Fad doesn't last for decades. Second, you guys have no idea how tough restaurant business is and specifically the coffee shop business. Sure anyone can open a coffee shop but how many are even going to last a year.

Are you saying that McDonalds, Burger King, Dunkin Donuts, Krispy Creme, 7-Eleven, "insert any other fast food restaurant here", and Walgreens new coffee businesses won't last a year?

If so, please explain.
Those companies have nothing to lose. They already have the physical store presence and don't need to sign any new leases or open any new shops.

Does it really cost that much for McDonalds to bring a coffee stand into their existing stores? :confused:
The coffee stands at McDonald stores are self serve(all the one's I've been to). Unlike Starbucks, they don't need to hire any employees to operate it.
You pay by the cup at MCD. Again why pay $4 for a cup of coffee at Starbucks when you can go to McDonalds and get one for <$2 with unlimited refills?
Because it's the experience. That's all there is to it. Starbucks coffee certainly doesn't taste any better than McDonalds or Dunkin Donuts coffee.

You really think any of the above companies are really taking longterm marketshare away from Starbucks? I guess that's where we disagree. People will cut back and substitute in hard times but most will come back eventually when it gets better. I guess you're not a coffee drinker.

Lother, let's just come back to it in couple of years. I know your position and you know mine. We know this company has over saturation problem right now in the US and the economy is not helping their $4 fancy coffee latte cause but I believe they will recover and be stronger than ever with added international growth.

My daily Starbucks intake has not changed nor has the locals here in NYC but their new Pike's Place roast is a complete catastrophe and they know it - which is why they offer Sumatra and Komodo if you ask for it. It's a weak, uncomplex coffee that is very reminiscent to generic "American coffee." I avoid it at all costs.

There are a few other things I've noticed over the last 8 or so months.

Their new paper cup alienates the brand. The change was strictly for cost reduction in that it's only one color now (brown) versus two (black and green). The cost reduction there is huge but the image has negatively changed. It's more generic somehow.

The staff has tremendously decreased in quality further alienating the brand in that more minorities (blacks and hispanics) are hired. They are not as careful as previous staff and they are not as knowledgeable about coffee and sometimes even show indifference towards customers who are expecting affordable but premium coffee and most importantly, service. These days you cannot ask for subtle customizations - they overdo them because they simply do not have the taste necessary to know what the customer is asking for. They don't care, they aren't coffee drinkers and they aren't getting paid as much.

I think customers would be willing to pay a little more for better quality and service as it has a very strong customer loyalty - it's like Apple if you will.

Recently they've decided to kill a few hundred stores to cut costs but I hope it's just one change they're making.
 

hiromizu

Diamond Member
Jul 6, 2007
3,405
1
0
Originally posted by: alphatarget1
Originally posted by: Naustica
Originally posted by: Lothar
Originally posted by: Naustica
First Starbucks is not a fad. Fad doesn't last for decades. Second, you guys have no idea how tough restaurant business is and specifically the coffee shop business. Sure anyone can open a coffee shop but how many are even going to last a year.

Are you saying that McDonalds, Burger King, Dunkin Donuts, Krispy Creme, 7-Eleven, "insert any other fast food restaurant here", and Walgreens new coffee businesses won't last a year?

If so, please explain.
Those companies have nothing to lose. They already have the physical store presence and don't need to sign any new leases or open any new shops.

Does it really cost that much for McDonalds to bring a coffee stand into their existing stores? :confused:
The coffee stands at McDonald stores are self serve(all the one's I've been to). Unlike Starbucks, they don't need to hire any employees to operate it.
You pay by the cup at MCD. Again why pay $4 for a cup of coffee at Starbucks when you can go to McDonalds and get one for <$2 with unlimited refills?
Because it's the experience. That's all there is to it. Starbucks coffee certainly doesn't taste any better than McDonalds or Dunkin Donuts coffee.

You really think any of the above companies are really taking longterm marketshare away from Starbucks? I guess that's where we disagree. People will cut back and substitute in hard times but most will come back eventually when it gets better. I guess you're not a coffee drinker.

Lother, let's just come back to it in couple of years. I know your position and you know mine. We know this company has over saturation problem right now in the US and the economy is not helping their $4 fancy coffee latte cause but I believe they will recover and be stronger than ever with added international growth.

I can see people not willing to shell out a lot of money for coffee and a lifestyle when the economy is down... I guess we'll see.

I don't think you understand the demographics of SBUX customers to be making such a statement. There's a big gap between the consumer levels who go to SBUX and customers who go to McD or Dunkin.
 

Slew Foot

Lifer
Sep 22, 2005
12,379
96
86
SBUX- elitists and wannabe elitists.
McD- Smart/cheap/frugal people

The wannabe elitists will switch over, that's a large portion of SBUX crowd.
 

imported_Lothar

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2006
4,559
1
0
Originally posted by: Naustica
Originally posted by: Lothar
Originally posted by: Naustica
First Starbucks is not a fad. Fad doesn't last for decades. Second, you guys have no idea how tough restaurant business is and specifically the coffee shop business. Sure anyone can open a coffee shop but how many are even going to last a year.

Are you saying that McDonalds, Burger King, Dunkin Donuts, Krispy Creme, 7-Eleven, "insert any other fast food restaurant here", and Walgreens new coffee businesses won't last a year?

If so, please explain.
Those companies have nothing to lose. They already have the physical store presence and don't need to sign any new leases or open any new shops.

Does it really cost that much for McDonalds to bring a coffee stand into their existing stores? :confused:
The coffee stands at McDonald stores are self serve(all the one's I've been to). Unlike Starbucks, they don't need to hire any employees to operate it.
You pay by the cup at MCD. Again why pay $4 for a cup of coffee at Starbucks when you can go to McDonalds and get one for <$2 with unlimited refills?
Because it's the experience. That's all there is to it. Starbucks coffee certainly doesn't taste any better than McDonalds or Dunkin Donuts coffee.

You really think any of the above companies are really taking longterm marketshare away from Starbucks? I guess that's where we disagree. People will cut back and substitute in hard times but most will come back eventually when it gets better. I guess you're not a coffee drinker.

Lothar, let's just come back to it in couple of years. I know your position and you know mine. We know this company has over saturation problem right now in the US and the economy is not helping their $4 fancy coffee latte cause but I believe they will recover and be stronger than ever with added international growth.

I don't drink coffee, period.
One does not need to drink Starbucks coffee to understand their business model my friend.
And just to clarify, my position isn't to "short" SBUX. My position is that there are better "long" candidates that also serve coffee to pick from than going "long" in SBUX. As overpriced as MCD's stock already is, even that would be a much better investment than SBUX.

BTW, if you want to create a coffee taste poll on this forum to see which of the major coffee chains tastes better McDonalds, Starbucks, or Dunkin Donuts, I'm up for that.
Starbucks won't win. I'm sure of it. ;)

Like I said, most people only go there for the experience. Their coffee doesn't taste any better than MCD or Dunkin Donuts.
Read the previous threads on this forum about Starbucks for posters opinions here.
Has Starbucks lost its soul?...Is it still hip?
Report: McDonald's coffee tastier, more economical than Starbucks' brew
Starbucks drinkers...poll for you guys/gals


The Starbucks by my school bookstore is filled with only students simply because everyone likes the environment, not because their coffee tastes any better than MCD.
The MCD down the street sells coffee, but who wants to drink coffee at MCD while reading the morning newspaper or doing homework when you can do that at SBUX(or bring your MCD coffee cup with you) and get the opportunity to talk to higher class people and some med school chicks?
 

ponyo

Lifer
Feb 14, 2002
19,688
2,811
126
Originally posted by: Lothar

I don't drink coffee, period.
One does not need to drink Starbucks coffee to understand their business model my friend.
And just to clarify, my position isn't to "short" SBUX. My position is that there are better "long" candidates that also serve coffee to pick from than going "long" in SBUX. As overpriced as MCD's stock already is, even that would be a much better investment than SBUX.

BTW, if you want to create a coffee taste poll on this forum to see which of the major coffee chains tastes better McDonalds, Starbucks, or Dunkin Donuts, I'm up for that.
Starbucks won't win. I'm sure of it. ;)

Like I said, most people only go there for the experience. Their coffee doesn't taste any better than MCD or Dunkin Donuts.
Read the previous threads on this forum about Starbucks for posters opinions here.
Has Starbucks lost its soul?...Is it still hip?
Report: McDonald's coffee tastier, more economical than Starbucks' brew
Starbucks drinkers...poll for you guys/gals

Haha. Do we really need to poll the anti-chain, "I can make better anything at home" crowd here? :laugh: Of course Starbucks will finish last here.

You think MCD is a coffee stock? I view MCD in the same retailer category as Walmart and Costco. Place people go when they're trying to pinch pennies especially during hard times.

Explain to me Starbucks business model. I must missed the part where they sell premium coffee beverages and own the market.

How about a little wager. 3 years from now, let's compare the stock price of MCD with SBUX. I'll buy you a Happy Meal or combo meal of your choice at MCD if you win. You buy me a drink of my choice at SBUX if you lose. They cost about the same. You can PayPal me my drink. ;)
 

imported_Lothar

Diamond Member
Aug 10, 2006
4,559
1
0
Originally posted by: Naustica
Originally posted by: Lothar

I don't drink coffee, period.
One does not need to drink Starbucks coffee to understand their business model my friend.
And just to clarify, my position isn't to "short" SBUX. My position is that there are better "long" candidates that also serve coffee to pick from than going "long" in SBUX. As overpriced as MCD's stock already is, even that would be a much better investment than SBUX.

BTW, if you want to create a coffee taste poll on this forum to see which of the major coffee chains tastes better McDonalds, Starbucks, or Dunkin Donuts, I'm up for that.
Starbucks won't win. I'm sure of it. ;)

Like I said, most people only go there for the experience. Their coffee doesn't taste any better than MCD or Dunkin Donuts.
Read the previous threads on this forum about Starbucks for posters opinions here.
Has Starbucks lost its soul?...Is it still hip?
Report: McDonald's coffee tastier, more economical than Starbucks' brew
Starbucks drinkers...poll for you guys/gals

Haha. Do we really need to poll the anti-chain, "I can make better anything at home" crowd here? :laugh: Of course Starbucks will finish last here.

You think MCD is a coffee stock? I view MCD in the same retailer category as Walmart and Costco. Place people go when they're trying to pinch pennies especially during hard times.

Explain to me Starbucks business model. I must missed the part where they sell premium coffee beverages and own the market.

How about a little wager. 3 years from now, let's compare the stock price of MCD with SBUX. I'll buy you a Happy Meal or combo meal of your choice at MCD if you win. You buy me a drink of my choice at SBUX if you lose. They cost about the same. You can PayPal me my drink. ;)

You can give the following options if you decide to create a poll...Only these 4 options.
MCD, SBUX, Dunkin Donuts, or I don't drink coffee. No other options such as "other" or "brew your own". That should shut down the "anti-chain" crowd.

I didn't say MCD is a coffee stock. I said they serve coffee.

And I'll take you on your offer if you want.
MCD with reinvested dividends will beat SBUX stock within 3 years.
 

ponyo

Lifer
Feb 14, 2002
19,688
2,811
126
Originally posted by: Lothar
Originally posted by: Naustica
Originally posted by: Lothar

I don't drink coffee, period.
One does not need to drink Starbucks coffee to understand their business model my friend.
And just to clarify, my position isn't to "short" SBUX. My position is that there are better "long" candidates that also serve coffee to pick from than going "long" in SBUX. As overpriced as MCD's stock already is, even that would be a much better investment than SBUX.

BTW, if you want to create a coffee taste poll on this forum to see which of the major coffee chains tastes better McDonalds, Starbucks, or Dunkin Donuts, I'm up for that.
Starbucks won't win. I'm sure of it. ;)

Like I said, most people only go there for the experience. Their coffee doesn't taste any better than MCD or Dunkin Donuts.
Read the previous threads on this forum about Starbucks for posters opinions here.
Has Starbucks lost its soul?...Is it still hip?
Report: McDonald's coffee tastier, more economical than Starbucks' brew
Starbucks drinkers...poll for you guys/gals

Haha. Do we really need to poll the anti-chain, "I can make better anything at home" crowd here? :laugh: Of course Starbucks will finish last here.

You think MCD is a coffee stock? I view MCD in the same retailer category as Walmart and Costco. Place people go when they're trying to pinch pennies especially during hard times.

Explain to me Starbucks business model. I must missed the part where they sell premium coffee beverages and own the market.

How about a little wager. 3 years from now, let's compare the stock price of MCD with SBUX. I'll buy you a Happy Meal or combo meal of your choice at MCD if you win. You buy me a drink of my choice at SBUX if you lose. They cost about the same. You can PayPal me my drink. ;)

You can give the following options if you decide to create a poll...Only these 4 options.
MCD, SBUX, Dunkin Donuts, or I don't drink coffee. No other options such as "other" or "brew your own". That should shut down the "anti-chain" crowd.

I didn't say MCD is a coffee stock. I said they serve coffee.

And I'll take you on your offer if you want.
MCD with reinvested dividends will beat SBUX stock within 3 years.

Polling here about Starbucks is like asking if Mac is better than PC to them. Same with iPod vs other MP3 players years back. No thanks. :p

As for the bet, you're on. I like caramel macchiato so that's going to cost you little extra pennies. SBUX today price: $15.68 MCD: $57.43.
 
Sep 29, 2004
18,656
68
91
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Naustica
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Naustica
First Starbucks is not a fad. Fad doesn't last for decades. Second, you guys have no idea how tough restaurant business is and specifically the coffee shop business. Sure anyone can open a coffee shop but how many are even going to last a year.

Possible play on SBUX is to buy at around $15.50. Stop loss at $15. Sell at $17. 50 cent risk for possible $1.50 reward. But this market is brutal. Nothing I'm trying is currently working or works for long. That's telling me my style of trading doesn't work in this type of market and I need to step back or we're close to a turning point. It's definitely frustrating and one of the toughest market I've traded.

GM got it's head taken off today after a what seemed like a positive reversal yesterday. That's just brutal.

Starbucks is not a fad. But SBUX stock is crap. Stop loss is worthless in this volatile market. It's also worthless if there is a shoe drop. Are you really trying to time SBUX stock from 15 to 17?

Their business is in a decline. Stock prices are based on future GROWTH. Hence, shitty stock.

That's what makes a market. Nope, I'm not currently trading the stock. That's how I would trade if I was trading it from the long side. I would buy it for my long term holding but I'm drowning in CarMax at the moment so I don't need another consumer retail stock. I rather buy more CarMax.

You want to buy more of a used car dealership with a 20 PE? Hmm, in fact Carmax looks like a good short candidate.

Hahahaha, short it! I would have second thoughts myslef, with Warren Buffett buying it and all.
 
Sep 29, 2004
18,656
68
91
Originally posted by: Capitalizt
I'm almost certain that stocks are pricing in an Obama presidency now.. Wall Street knows Obama is going to win, and they need to price in the coming income tax hike, as well as the hike in capital gains taxes from 15% to 28%. This is going to be a HUGE blow to the market and the smart money knows it. I think we may see a small bounce from here for purely technical reasons...but my "gut" feeling says in order to be fairly valued for 8 years of liberalism/socialism, we still need a 20-25% haircut across the board. It doesn't matter how strong the fundamentals are...All companies are going to be effected by bad government policies, and their prices must reflect that.

Warren Buffet referred to the 15% long term capital gains rate as a civil injustice. He pays less in taxes than his secretary who is taxed 15.7% at a minimum.
 
Sep 29, 2004
18,656
68
91
Originally posted by: Naustica
Originally posted by: Lothar
Originally posted by: Naustica
First Starbucks is not a fad. Fad doesn't last for decades. Second, you guys have no idea how tough restaurant business is and specifically the coffee shop business. Sure anyone can open a coffee shop but how many are even going to last a year.

Are you saying that McDonalds, Burger King, Dunkin Donuts, Krispy Creme, 7-Eleven, "insert any other fast food restaurant here", and Walgreens new coffee businesses won't last a year?

If so, please explain.
Those companies have nothing to lose. They already have the physical store presence and don't need to sign any new leases or open any new shops.

Does it really cost that much for McDonalds to bring a coffee stand into their existing stores? :confused:
The coffee stands at McDonald stores are self serve(all the one's I've been to). Unlike Starbucks, they don't need to hire any employees to operate it.
You pay by the cup at MCD. Again why pay $4 for a cup of coffee at Starbucks when you can go to McDonalds and get one for <$2 with unlimited refills?
Because it's the experience. That's all there is to it. Starbucks coffee certainly doesn't taste any better than McDonalds or Dunkin Donuts coffee.

You really think any of the above companies are really taking longterm marketshare away from Starbucks? I guess that's where we disagree. People will cut back and substitute in hard times but most will come back eventually when it gets better. I guess you're not a coffee drinker.

Lother, let's just come back to it in couple of years. I know your position and you know mine. We know this company has over saturation problem right now in the US and the economy is not helping their $4 fancy coffee latte cause but I believe they will recover and be stronger than ever with added international growth.

Starbux sells candy coffee. Real coffee drinkers brew their own coffee.
 
Sep 29, 2004
18,656
68
91
Originally posted by: Engineer
Originally posted by: Capitalizt
I'm almost certain that stocks are pricing in an Obama presidency now.. Wall Street knows Obama is going to win, and they need to price in the coming income tax hike, as well as the hike in capital gains taxes from 15% to 28%. This is going to be a HUGE blow to the market and the smart money knows it. I think we may see a small bounce from here for purely technical reasons...but my "gut" feeling says in order to be fairly valued for 8 years of liberalism/socialism, we still need a 20-25% haircut across the board. It doesn't matter how strong the fundamentals are...All companies are going to be effected by bad government policies, and their prices must reflect that.

LOL. The market has been booming under Bush and the 6 years of GOP Congressional rule....er...wait. S&P and Nasdaq are down and the Dow is up around 700 points....in 7.5 years. Great returns there. Both my and my wifes Roth IRAs, which have been contributed for 5 years on a dollar cost average method, both went negative (her's finally today) for the entire 5 year term. Great booming markets under the GOP. Obama (or almost any other Democrat) couldn't do any worse than "The Lyin King" Bush.

Whether you admit it or not, the stock market usually does well under a Democrat and history shows that.

Pander your politics and political beliefs in P&N, not here. This wasn't a stock market post, this was a reflection of your dislike of anything Democrat and Obama in general.

This is 100% accurate. hell, you jsut have to look at how the Republicans ran a blank check style gov't.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Naustica
Originally posted by: JS80
Originally posted by: Naustica
First Starbucks is not a fad. Fad doesn't last for decades. Second, you guys have no idea how tough restaurant business is and specifically the coffee shop business. Sure anyone can open a coffee shop but how many are even going to last a year.

Possible play on SBUX is to buy at around $15.50. Stop loss at $15. Sell at $17. 50 cent risk for possible $1.50 reward. But this market is brutal. Nothing I'm trying is currently working or works for long. That's telling me my style of trading doesn't work in this type of market and I need to step back or we're close to a turning point. It's definitely frustrating and one of the toughest market I've traded.

GM got it's head taken off today after a what seemed like a positive reversal yesterday. That's just brutal.

Starbucks is not a fad. But SBUX stock is crap. Stop loss is worthless in this volatile market. It's also worthless if there is a shoe drop. Are you really trying to time SBUX stock from 15 to 17?

Their business is in a decline. Stock prices are based on future GROWTH. Hence, shitty stock.

That's what makes a market. Nope, I'm not currently trading the stock. That's how I would trade if I was trading it from the long side. I would buy it for my long term holding but I'm drowning in CarMax at the moment so I don't need another consumer retail stock. I rather buy more CarMax.

You want to buy more of a used car dealership with a 20 PE? Hmm, in fact Carmax looks like a good short candidate.

Hahahaha, short it! I would have second thoughts myslef, with Warren Buffett buying it and all.

Warren buffet is a dinosaur. Compare his performance to S&P 500 YTD. It's worse. And the only reason why he's outperforming the past few years was his bet against the dollar and long silver.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
Originally posted by: Capitalizt
I'm almost certain that stocks are pricing in an Obama presidency now.. Wall Street knows Obama is going to win, and they need to price in the coming income tax hike, as well as the hike in capital gains taxes from 15% to 28%. This is going to be a HUGE blow to the market and the smart money knows it. I think we may see a small bounce from here for purely technical reasons...but my "gut" feeling says in order to be fairly valued for 8 years of liberalism/socialism, we still need a 20-25% haircut across the board. It doesn't matter how strong the fundamentals are...All companies are going to be effected by bad government policies, and their prices must reflect that.

Warren Buffet referred to the 15% long term capital gains rate as a civil injustice. He pays less in taxes than his secretary who is taxed 15.7% at a minimum.

This just shows what a fucking hack Buffet is. I don't see him voluntarily paying the STCG rate. The low LTCG encourages investment. How can he not understand that? Oh because he's just a lucky tool who rode the bull market into the 90s and avoided the dot bomb by not investing in technology, which he self proclaims not to understand.

Lucky stock picker does not equal good macroeconomist.