Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
Buy good companies at great prices ..
WEB can but improtant concepts into words so well:
"It's far better to buy a wonderful company at a fair price than a fair company at a wonderful price."
Such a simple quote but it says so much. The guy really has a gift with words. If he made a video and sold it such that proceeds went to charity, I would pay in the hundreds of dollars for the video. For a 6 hour video, I would pay $1,000. He won't write a book because there is nothing left to be written that has not been written already (like "The Intelligent Investor"). But if he were to write a book or do a video or anything and donate the proceeds to charity, wouldn't that be wonderful?
I think WEB sold UNP when he bought BNI. For that reason alone, I would only want to buy BNI ... especially if all the railroads are up by about the same percentage.
Well Lothar .... it's actually nice talking to you. Consider the PM I sent you. I think you would liek the forums over there
Although Buffett reduced his stake, he still has a large stake in UNP.
His stake in UNP is certainly nothing to sneeze at.
I went with UNP because they have the lowest debt and were the only railroad(of the "big 4") to boost their 1st quarter earnings when I started analyzing railroads last May after the Buffett picks in April. I think both are good, and I'm sure Buffett has access to much better numbers than I do to support his decision, but who cares really?
BNI YTD: 23.96%
UNP YTD: 20.71%
BNI 1yr: 16.78%
UNP 1yr: 26.08%
If all the railroads are up by almost the same percentage, then it doesn't really matter which one I pick does it?
Both UNP and BNI are good and their 15 year records are clean. They're on the east coast, ship chinese goods (which will keep happening because America likes "Wal-Mart") and also transport coal. BNI boasts one of the fastest railroad growth, but the company seems "expensive" when compared to the others.
CSX seems to be the worst of the four IMO. Slowest trains, poor service. East coast is bad, M'kay? They're losing a LOT of volume because Ford and GM are creating less vehicles in Michigan leading to less shipments. Most new plants being built by them is based in Mexico now. Granted they're balancing that by increasing coal shipments in Florida. Right now, there's some in-fighting going on between the management and some hedge funds.
TCI/3G White paper "CSX: The Case for Change"
NSC is the most efficient of them all(they have one of the lowest accidents rate and many other good stats), but unfortunately they has little room for growth compared to the others because they're on the east coast. They suffer from the same reason CSX does above (without the fighting and Jim Cramer part)
Lets not forget Canadian National. Rumor has it that Buffett convinced Bill gates on opening a large stake. Bill Gates investment vehicle(Cascade Investment) owns 8.7% of CNI shares.
The thing with railroads is it doesn't really matter which one you pick. Fastest growth, lowest debt, best valuation, most efficient, etc...
At the end of the day, they all move up and down by almost the same amount IMO.
"A rising tide lifts all boats"
And no, I will not sell(or exchange) my current UNP shares for BNI just for the sake of Buffett. I see no benefit in doing so.
If Buffett thought UNP was such a horrible investment, he will have sold all his shares.