Originally posted by: Lothar
Originally posted by: IHateMyJob2004
Originally posted by: Lothar
Originally posted by: Naustica
They seem to shoot at least one Nasdaq tech company a week. Today, it's Akamai. That was one hot stock back in the .com bubble and I traded it long and short many times back then. I haven't touch it since '01 but see today it blew up and received 25% haircut. That is just brutal stuff. I would be very nervous if I had any tech stock as a miss gets you a nice haircut these days.
There are good tech stocks to own.
Stay
with those that actually have a moat. That means HPQ, INTC, MSFT and IBM.
Stay
away from those that are either over-hyped, or don't make any sense, or both. That means GOOG, CSCO, RIMM, AAPL, and pretty much almost anything else.
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/...cEY7ExeSqKA&refer=home
MSFT is the cheapest it's been since it's IPO. They might do a $20 billion buyback this quarter.
The problem with tech is that you don't know who will be around long term. For all I know, Apple will take over and PCs will become the thing of history museums. Case in point, 10 years ago would you have thought that Apple of all companies would have the number one portable music device? In the early 90s, IBM was big. What the heck was Dell and HPQ?
Tech changes to fast. You can not reliably predict the future. If you can not do that, how can you value a tech company?
Sorry Lothar. I think you are one of the better investors on Anandtech but I disagree on tech.
With so many industries why not pick something with more certainty?
I'm pretty much as tech adverse as you'll ever see almost anyone here get.
The
only tech company I'm in is HPQ. Nothing else.
Of my 18 stocks, only 1 is a tech.
INTC, MSFT, and IBM I mentioned earlier are also options because they will be around for years to come and unlike most other tech companies rife with speculation, they actually have a moat. You're better off staying with those names than trying to find the next "Microsoft".
It costs Intel $3.5 billion to build a fab. How many companies on the market can afford to make such an investment? Not much. The same way someone cannot wake up the next morning to say they want to make their own railroad to compete with UNP and BNI.
That's real competitive advantage, not Facebook, Google, or some guy making a web page and selling it for billions of dollars, or other tech stocks etc...
Why don't I have INTC, MSFT, or IBM?
Because I have my personal set limit on the number of stocks I ever want to own at a time (max 20). I currently have 18.
"If you can buy more of your best ideas, why put money into your 20th-best idea?"
-Bruce Berkowitz
I only have room for 1 tech stock.
HPQ is a hold for me. I'm not buying, but I'm also not selling what I currently have either.
For reference:
HPQ is the 6th largest portfolio holding after LUK, GILD, JNJ, KFT, and UNP.