• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

**Offical 2015-16 NFL Week 8 Thread**

Page 5 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
lupi said:
team looked like they gave up once geno stayed in after a couple series.
Click to expand...

A LOT of poor tackling in that game, a 3yrd pass to the flat turns into a TD?, 3,-4 guys fail to bring him down or get juked out of their shoes. Never thought I'd see that out of a TB coached team.
 
LOL @ 'Boys. Five losses in a row. So much for the bandwagon fans around here, they are no where to be found anymore.
 
Ahh. Learned something new today. Always thought each team in each division played the same teams.. But they don't. Like NE/Jets both play teams from AFC West and AFC North. But NE plays the Broncos/Steelers while the Jets play the Raiders/Browns. Which gives the Jets two more easier games. Outside of that the games are similar.
 
emperus said:
Ahh. Learned something new today. Always thought each team in each division played the same teams.. But they don't. Like NE/Jets both play teams from AFC West and AFC North. But NE plays the Broncos/Steelers while the Jets play the Raiders/Browns. Which gives the Jets two more easier games. Outside of that the games are similar.
Click to expand...

Is that new this year? Pretty sure it has been identical division v division matchups all these years...
 
Svnla said:
LOL @ 'Boys. Five losses in a row. So much for the bandwagon fans around here, they are no where to be found anymore.
Click to expand...

Okay there buddy. There are maybe two Cowboys fans here, including me. Oh, no! A team carried by Romo and missing their best WR isn't as good without them? Who'd a thunk it! I mean, obviously Seattle is so good. Where are all those bandwagon fans talking about how little Russ beat a Cowboys team with a third string QB!
 
smackababy said:
Okay there buddy. There are maybe two Cowboys fans here, including me. Oh, no! A team carried by Romo and missing their best WR isn't as good without them? Who'd a thunk it! I mean, obviously Seattle is so good. Where are all those bandwagon fans talking about how little Russ beat a Cowboys team with a third string QB!
Click to expand...

I was not talking about ATOT but in real life. Around this area, so much bandwagon hopping Cowboys fans for a while it was sickening but not recently.

I was not a 'Hawks fan either, not care for their premature "dynasty" claim.

<<<---- Fins fan since Marino/Mark brothers.
 
I'd been figuring they should keep Peyton this game, next game, then give Osweiler a chance. But the way Peyton's playing now let's stick with him. 🙂
 
I was wondering if our defense was as good as the stats showed, or if it was just a product of a soft schedule at the start of the year. This was the true test against a good offense, and they've done a fantastic job at flustering Aaron Rodgers
 
How that was not fwd. progress in unbelievable to me. The NFL needs to figure out how to get more consistent application of the rules.
 
SSSnail said:
GB - They pretty much don't have a secondary at this point, and Denver always get special "home field" calls, or non-calls when playing at home.
Click to expand...

Yeah, also seems to be poor coaching like in that Seattle debacle. They seem to have made 0 adjustments all game. (maybe they have too many injuries to be able to).
 
SSSnail said:
I swear it said DEFENSE when I first read it... anyways, carry on. :ninja: But I'm watching you, like a hawk.
Click to expand...

^^^ Thinks he's a hawk:

65_bird_Booby.jpg
 
emperus said:
I think this game may say more about GB than it does about Denver.
Click to expand...

They were talking in the pregame that no one GB has beaten has a winning record. Closest is Seattle at 4-4, and they just squeaked by a really bad Cowboys team to get there. Still, I would have thought this would have been a more competitive game.
 
smackababy said:
Okay there buddy. There are maybe two Cowboys fans here, including me. Oh, no! A team carried by Romo and missing their best WR isn't as good without them? Who'd a thunk it! I mean, obviously Seattle is so good. Where are all those bandwagon fans talking about how little Russ beat a Cowboys team with a third string QB!
Click to expand...
Us real Seahawks fans are peering out from between our fingers, and glad for a W that was not deserved. That was a shitty game any way you looked at it. 1 td between both teams. Punt count was pretty damn high.
 
skyking said:
Us real Seahawks fans are peering out from between our fingers, and glad for a W that was not deserved. That was a shitty game any way you looked at it. 1 td between both teams. Punt count was pretty damn high.
Click to expand...

It wasn't just the total punts, it was the sheer number of 3-outs, and it's not like it was all defense. Terrible game all around.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top