I love to refer to them as brain defects because the nature of the defect is excessive defensiveness. You have tried to suggest there's something wrong with me. I don't care. There are 16 peer review studies I can turn to in order to learn about myself. Why would I worry about your opinion. I know also that you see me as pretending to be superior owing to a sever self confidence problem, the exact thing conservatives have that I call a mental defect. You see in me the truth about yourself. The difference between us is very slim. I just have 16 peer reviewed studies that say you are talking about yourself, not me.
Good lord you are painful to read, its like a radical religious nut but instead its radical science theology. There are probably 1600 peer reviewed weather predictions that all have proved out to be wrong. We had "peer reviewed" scientists claiming the earth was flat. Ironically, proving the earth was in fact not flat will be far easier than proving out your wild 'Oh god I need them to be true to make myself feel better' irrational beliefs.
Tell me, in these 16 "peer reviewed" studies, did they determine how the information to answer the questions got in the "fear center", and why? Let me guess...they didn't.
Chuck