Ummm, no. We're doing it to discourage their development of a nuclear weapon and the subsequently inevitable Middle East arms race (and instability) that would follow, period.So we basically commit financial terrorism against an entire nation in order to " punish " a few at the top?
Ummm, no. We're doing it to discourage their development of a nuclear weapon and the subsequently inevitable Middle East arms race (and instability) that would follow, period.
"Financial terrorism"? Glad to see that you're still an idiot...
Perhaps we can get a comment on the brilliance of Obama's foreign policy from Chris Stevens. Oh, wait . . .http://blogs.reuters.com/globalinvesting/2012/10/02/iran-currency-plunge-an-omen-for-change/
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/glob...-camerman-defected-during-his-un-visit/57447/
Bin Laden, Gaddaffi, now the Ayatollahs...
As I've said previously, Romney plays checkers at the level of a child who learned the rules of the game a few minutes ago. Obama, Clinton, and Bernanke, multi-dimensional chess at the level of grand master.
:ninja:
With Feralkid's correction,exactly right. To be fair, this would be true of any American President. American Presidents do not drive revolution in Muslim and/or Middle Eastern countries, they merely play someone who does on TV.I think you vastly overestimate the planning and capabilities of your government. The Arab Spring was nearly wholly self-initiated and propelled. It was wonderful of some of NATO to assist in Lebanon and to a lesser extent in Egypt and Syria, but they were reactions, not actions.
As I've said previously, Romney plays checkers at the level of a child who learned the rules of the game a few minutes ago. Obama, Clinton, and Bernanke, multi-dimensional chess at the level of grand master.
:ninja:
LIQUIDITY CRISIS
The volume and level of re-hypothecation suggests a frightening alternative hypothesis for the current liquidity crisis being experienced by banks and for why regulators around the world decided to step in to prop up the markets recently. To date, reports have been focused on how Eurozone default concerns were provoking fear in the markets and causing liquidity to dry up.
Most have been focused on how a Eurozone default would result in huge losses in Eurozone bonds being felt across the world’s banks. However, re-hypothecation suggests an even greater fear. Considering that re-hypothecation may have increased the financial footprint of Eurozone bonds by at least four fold then a Eurozone sovereign default could be apocalyptic.
U.S. banks direct holding of sovereign debt is hardly negligible. According to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), U.S. banks hold $181 billion in the sovereign debt of Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain. If we factor in off-balance sheet transactions such as re-hypothecations and repos, then the picture becomes frightening.
http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuter...d_the_great_Wall_St_re-hypothecation_scandal/
(and yes, I realize this specific quote is talking about Greece / Europe from last winter, but I believe same issue was playing out as in 2008, except financial markets were utterly prepared for shock in 2008, and there was no adult supervision in 2008, while Europe ultimately did have adult supervision when it counted)
IIRC, Frontline's episode on Wall Street crisis stated that their models didn't take into effect a 25% drop in value of collateral upon which whole rickety global financial system was built."In America it is the wholesale funded institutions that are in the most trouble. Think Bear Stearns, Lehman, Fannie, Freddie. They are in diabolical trouble.
The funding is leaving them. It does not matter whether rates are 0 or 10 – the funding is still going."
Wholesale Funding Crisis: http://brontecapital.blogspot.com/2008/07/deflation-and-bank-bailouts-in-japan.html
Money Market Funds as Shadow Banking Conduits: http://londonbanker.blogspot.com/2012/03/your-bank-fiduciary-or-predator.html
I don't believe it was the housing bubble per se that caused stock market crash.
I think it was unexpected and not sufficiently telegraphed in advance to Wall Street collapse of shadow banking system (you know, George "Nero" Bush either chopping wood on his ranch or riding his bicycle, contently thinking we are buying low and selling high, when world around him burns to the ground) that Lehman Brothers caused that triggered the financial panic. Lehman itself didn't prepare for bankruptcy, and the actual bankruptcy was going smoothly until, IIRC, a hiccup occurred in some senior unsecured debt that resulted in lots of hedge fund managers suddenly seeing their money get vaporized into oblivion right in front of their eyes. Panic then ensued.
IIRC, Frontline's episode on Wall Street crisis stated that their models didn't take into effect a 25% drop in value of collateral upon which whole rickety global financial system was built.
If all it were was "subprime", then as Larry Kudlow used to crow, subprime only represents 15% of GDP and can cause a mild recession, at worst...
Even if economy doesn't start to grow back at potential capacity (3.5% real GDP or so?) under Bernanke's remaining term, I think history will treat him very very well because of the Depression and spiral of Debt Deflation that he was (up to this point successfully) able to avoid.
October Surprise?
Republican's negotiating with Iran behind the back of the State Dept. You know, like before Reagan was elected. From Dick Cheney's book of tricks.
I don't believe it was the housing bubble per se that caused stock market crash.
I think it was unexpected and not sufficiently telegraphed in advance to Wall Street collapse of shadow banking system (you know, George "Nero" Bush either chopping wood on his ranch or riding his bicycle, contently thinking we are buying low and selling high, when world around him burns to the ground) that Lehman Brothers caused that triggered the financial panic. Lehman itself didn't prepare for bankruptcy, and the actual bankruptcy was going smoothly until, IIRC, a hiccup occurred in some senior unsecured debt that resulted in lots of hedge fund managers suddenly seeing their money get vaporized into oblivion right in front of their eyes. Panic then ensued.
IIRC, Frontline's episode on Wall Street crisis stated that their models didn't take into effect a 25% drop in value of collateral upon which whole rickety global financial system was built.
If all it were was "subprime", then as Larry Kudlow used to crow, subprime only represents 15% of GDP and can cause a mild recession, at worst...
Even if economy doesn't start to grow back at potential capacity (3.5% real GDP or so?) under Bernanke's remaining term, I think history will treat him very very well because of the Depression and spiral of Debt Deflation that he was (up to this point successfully) able to avoid.
Reagan's stance got the hostages out.
Carter was going nowhere
<snip>
Which voucher had a list of names that the American people could vote for in order to nominate a candidate to run for the Democratic/Republican party again ??
Oh thats right we the people have no say in who we have to vote for to become the US President, the choices we do have were narrowed down to Romney/Obama from a list of pre-selected people that the American people did not choose [nobody chose Hilary Clinton either as a possible President]. And those choices all came from behind closed doors, our candidate selections are just as controlled as Iran's. Maybe that is why some some countrie's laugh at us when we talk about open elections, ours are anything but open.
When/if you go to the polls in Nov; look closely at the ballot.
There are more than 2 choices.
Same as in 2008 and 2004 and back at least 50 years.
While true the two big parties have written the rules to make a 3rd part absurdly difficult at this point.
Does the Presidential ballot also have a write in option? I don't recall.
Obviously the Republican hierarchy is conspiring to hide Mickey's many millions of votes.Yes - Mickey Mouse usually gets about %0.5