werepossum
Elite Member
- Jul 10, 2006
- 29,873
- 463
- 126
Also the attractive, the smart, and the well connected.Fortune favors the bold.
Also the attractive, the smart, and the well connected.Fortune favors the bold.
Yep, they don't ask for deplomas when you apply for those jobs, they want to see your bank statement.
Hey, you figured it out.
A job is nothing more than providing value in terms of work/labor, if your skills and labor don't have a market...well, find another line of works.
Work and reward have big correlation. Embrace free market or be doomed to be crushed by it's basic human nature. I learned this lesson long ago, live it learn it, love it or be left behind.
I'd laugh but I know you are serious.
If you try really hard you can get all 7 logical fallacies there.
Yeh, that applies today just the same way it did in 1931. Having a job today involves a fair amount of luck, whether you like it or not. We all like to imagine that if we lost our job today that we'd find a better one tomorrow, when that's not necessarily true at all other than in Wingnutlandia.
Middle class & working class people are subject to forces beyond their control, particularly in a system geared to best serve those already at the top of the economic foodchain. Mitt never missed a meal when any of his victim corporate acquisitions went under, but I'm sure more than a few others did. It's not like we could all be predatory hedge fund managers, anyway.
That's precious. Two minions of the corrupt status quo laughing at morons. I wonder if the morons they're laughing at are the protestors trying to make America better, or the army of brainwashed apologists they know will obediently flood the media to protect their masters' corruption. I also wonder just how smug these two clowns will be when some greedy executive finally realizes he can hire guys in India to stare out the window for one-tenth the cost.Seen over the occutards in NYC on monday. So true, so very true...
![]()
There are no OWS protestors trying to make America better, but there sure are moron OWS protestors.
Don't let Spidey get you all riled up. This should be a happy time for you, tomorrow being Karl Marx' birthday AND the launch of Obama's official re-election campaign.That's precious. Two minions of the corrupt status quo laughing at morons. I wonder if the morons they're laughing at are the protestors trying to make America better, or the army of brainwashed apologists they know will obediently flood the media to protect their masters' corruption. I also wonder just how smug these two clowns will be when some greedy executive finally realizes he can hire guys in India to stare out the window for one-tenth the cost.
Don't let Spidey get you all riled up. This should be a happy time for you, tomorrow being Karl Marx' birthday AND the launch of Obama's official re-election campaign.
It's seems so unfair. You and Spidey get to celebrate corruption 365 days per year.Don't let Spidey get you all riled up. This should be a happy time for you, tomorrow being Karl Marx' birthday AND the launch of Obama's official re-election campaign.
You can celebrate corruption year 'round too. You have the GSA party scandal, the EPA emulating the Roman practice of "crucifying" a few random entities to scare the rest into submission, the BATFE funneling and even funding arms illegally to drug cartels to make political points on the people those cartels murder with their new toys - lots of government conquests over the private sector to celebrate here.It's seems so unfair. You and Spidey get to celebrate corruption 365 days per year.
(You should save such bottom-feeding hackery for Spidey. You can be so much better than that ... when you choose to be.)
anything more than bottom-feeding hackery? Bullheads living downstream from Tyson sewage pipes were embarrassed by that statement.Two minions of the corrupt status quo laughing at morons. I wonder if the morons they're laughing at are the protestors trying to make America better, or the army of brainwashed apologists they know will obediently flood the media to protect their masters' corruption. I also wonder just how smug these two clowns will be when some greedy executive finally realizes he can hire guys in India to stare out the window for one-tenth the cost.
Ah, but the difference is I don't celebrate that corruption either. I fully support appropriate punishment for those harming America, regardless of whether they are government bureaucrats, Wall Street "banksters", or any others who abuse money and power for personal enrichment.You can celebrate corruption year 'round too. You have the GSA party scandal, the EPA emulating the Roman practice of "crucifying" a few random entities to scare the rest into submission, the BATFE funneling and even funding arms illegally to drug cartels to make political points on the people those cartels murder with their new toys - lots of government conquests over the private sector to celebrate here.
It was an appropriate, in-kind response to a snarky photo and the person who posted it.And seriously - on what planet is
anything more than bottom-feeding hackery? Bullheads living downstream from Tyson sewage pipes were embarrassed by that statement.
HARRISON SCHULTZ, “OCCUPY” PARTICIPANT: We never left. We were just tired. I mean, anarchy isn’t easy. This is a lot of work. We had to hibernate for awhile, but today we are resurging. The energy is really good out in the streets.
The problem here is capitalism. That’s what needs to change. That’s what is failing all of these people. I personally don’t care about this election. I know other people are working on it.
But I am looking at far, far more radical alternatives than political alternatives. I would like to actually see a new form of politics entirely.
Yeah, most of my friends are liberal, and we've all hated the Occupy movement since late September. It makes all liberals look like anarchist vegan hippie douchebag stoner assholes with absolutely no idea how societies work. These people do not represent me!I'm a little late but I did see some of the May day protests in NYC in person so I'll add my thoughts. The most surprising thing to me was the dominant presence of public sector union employees demanding more money/benefits. Judging by the signs they made up 60% of attendees. The other 40% was split roughly evenly between what I would consider reasonable anti-wall street types and radical communists/anarchists.
I got the impression that the movement has been completely co-opted by the traditional far left. In the beginning there was some common ground with the Tea Party in opposing cronie capitalism and at least some original thought but both seem to be gone now.
I find the harder I work, the luckier I get. I also find that if I guide my career to places where there is high demand and short supply the luckier I get. But that's not luck then is it? That's work and taking a very active role in my future.
That's been the traditional May Day demographic in the U.S. Organized labor has long used May 1 as a day to call attention to their interests. OWS was a newcomer.I'm a little late but I did see some of the May day protests in NYC in person so I'll add my thoughts. The most surprising thing to me was the dominant presence of public sector union employees demanding more money/benefits. Judging by the signs they made up 60% of attendees. ...
Don't worry, Spidey- there's lots of guys who'll do your job just as well for less- your boss just hasn't found them. He's looking, bet on that. It also seems very likely that there are people who work a lot harder for a lot less.
If you think it's all hard work & no luck you'd probably be interested in Arizona Oceanfront, too. Hell, your ego is so puffed up & fragile that you could probably stand on the lot, claim to smell the ocean... never admitting you'd been had.
You are naive. There's always somebody who can do Job x for less. If you're lucky your bosses are content with the status quo and aren't actively looking to replace you. If you're not, if your bosses' greed is greater than their fondness for you and your peers, it's just a matter of time before you become a statistic too.I don't think you understand supply and demand when it comes to labor. With such high demand and such low supply, there isn't anybody that would do my job for much less.
Again, you're naive (or badly self-deluded). Unless the business is incompetently managed, all employees are profit centers. That's the only reason a competent business ever hires anyone, because they'll make more money with them than without them. (Well, ignoring nepotism or a great rack.)Plus I'm a profit center, I MAKE my company more money.
Same with those ba-ba-ba-banksters. They MAKE the business more money.
You are naive. There's always somebody who can do Job x for less. If you're lucky your bosses are content with the status quo and aren't actively looking to replace you. If you're not, if your bosses' greed is greater than their fondness for you and your peers, it's just a matter of time before you become a statistic too.
Again, you're naive (or badly self-deluded). Unless the business is incompetently managed, all employees are profit centers. That's the only reason a competent business ever hires anyone, because they'll make more money with them than without them. (Well, ignoring nepotism or a great rack.)
